The UAE's Bloody War in Sudan with Sami Hamdi

سيف الله

IB Expert
Messages
4,030
Reaction score
119
Gender
Male
Religion
Islam
Salaam

Not done this in a while, a new thread!

Like to share.

Blurb

At the time where our attention is fixed on Gaza, rightly, another conflict is taking place with horrendous cost to human life. Sadly As always, our ummah has become subject to the political ambitions of egotistical actors and their outside backers. Sudan is burning. There are 8 million people on the move, escaping the indiscriminate murder, rape and pillage of what can only be described as two warlords that thwarted a people’s revolution – aided by external powers.

Today we explore these two conflicts. In a way, they are one. They are recent episodes of a Muslim world in crisis. Our ummah today lives in a perpetual state of conflict, can we escape this dire situation. We are now 100 years since the formal demise of the Ottoman state, what does the next 100 years look like.


 
Salaam

Another update.

Sudan Watch

When African nations met in Burundi for the 23rd summit of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa last month, they called for all acts of violence and hostilities in Sudan to cease. Sadly, they devoted just one sentence to it in their 11-page final communique.

This reflects how little impact the horrors in Sudan currently have on the world news agenda. Sudan has been in meltdown since violence began in Khartoum in April 2023 between the Sudanese Army (SAF) and the RSF, a paramilitary force evolved from the janjaweed, an Arab militia notorious for atrocities in Darfure in the 2000s.

In 2019 the RSF and SAF worked together to eject former president Omar al-Bashir and share power. But the RSF resisted integration into the army and the two are not fighting for supremacy. Violence has spread across Sudan, provoking a catastrophic humanitarian crises: 250000 confirmed civilian dead (some estimate 150,000); 11.3m displaced; a quarter of the population starving and another quarter hungry; cholera everywhere; healthcare collapsed and half the under-5s at risk of serious disease.

There is no 'good party' to save them: each side commits horrific abuses in the areas they control, so sure of their impunity they upload footage of the torture and murder of civilians without bothering to hide their identities.

Both sides also use sexual violence as a weapon, with the RSF currently subjecting Khartoum in particular to serial gang rape. Victims range from nine upwards, with many young girls dying in the process. Most civilian deaths though result from bombing of civilian areas by both sides, mainly with drones.

Desperate civilians are pleading for UN protection. Last month the UN Human Rights Councils independent fact finder found that both sides were violating international humanitarian law; they too called for an impartial protective forces. On 28 October, however, UN secretary general Antonio Guterres rules this out given the current chaos. Instead he urged cutting off arms supplies and pressuring both sides to stop the atrocities.

A vain hope. Both sides would have run out of weapons if they weren't receiving fresh supplies - including armed drones, anti tank missiles, rocket launchers and mortar munitions. - made by companies in China, Iran, Russia, Serbia and the UAE. The UN 2004 Sudan sanctions prohibit supplying weapons to belligerents in Darfur but they dont cover all of Sudan - and enough UN members argue that they shouldnt. Russia says the SAF is the legitimate party and should be armed, while according to the New York Times, they UAE was smuggling weapons to the RSF via eastern Chad.

AS for asking both sides to stop committing atrocities, this may mean waiting until no one is left on whom to commit them. Perhaps if the abusers felt the worlds media focusing unforgivingly upon them this might change, because scrutiny brings fear of justice. But for that to happen the world needs to take a collective interest in halting the savagery.

PE No 1637 p 21.

Another short summary

 
Last edited:
Salaam

Another update

Postcard from Khartoum

The fall of Khartoum to one of our warring parties in March, and the fighting raging around Port Sudan, have attracted little interest - and that is how the protagonists in Sudans latest civil war like it.


At least 150,000 people are dead, 13m displaced and 25m face severe food insecurity or famine. Yet we still find ourselves way down the newsroom running order below Gaza, Ukraine or the latest confected outrage from the US president. Even fewer hacks report on the dirty secret at the heart of a war that has raged for two years: the alleged involvement of the United Arab Emirates.

This tawdry conflict is not as parochial as it might appear. Saudi Arabia and Russia are just two of those accused of meddling. Things kicked off in April 2023 when the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia launched its coup for sole control against it erstwhile (and just as self appointed) military government partners - the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF). The SAF believed the RSF is the mailed fist of the UAE and is being funded by the Emirates to control Sudan and protect their huge
investments here.

The UAE hotly denies this and rubbished a claims that SAF backed officials took to the International Court of Justice as 'political theatre'. Earlier this month, the ICJ dismissed the claim saying it lacked jurisdiction. A cunning UAE opt out of the Genocide Convention means it cannot be sued by other countries over genocide allegations!

Sudan is of huge importance to the UAE. The Emiratis number little more than 1 million and make up barely 10 percent of the population in their own expat and migrant heavy country. Arable land and water in the UAE are scarce, forcing the Emiratis to
import 90 percent of their food, much of it from their vast farms across the Red Sea in Sudan.

The UAE controls at least 200,000 hectares in Sudan via companies such as its largest listed firm, the Internal Holding Group.
Emiratis have also invested $6bn in the new Red Sea port at Abu Amama, allowing them to exert control over Sudans land and trade routes - which is perhaps why the SAF, which has other friends int eh region, said it wanted to cancel the project last November.

This insidious colonisation and perceived robbery of resources caused a backlash that the Emiratis feared was gathering momentum. But the RSF is an odd choice for the usually image conscious Emirs. The militia is basically a repacked version of the Janjaweed, those bands comprising 57 varieties of manic organised by out long deposed and not terribly lamented ex strongman Omar Hassan al Bashir. In 2004, the largely nomadic Arab militias were accused of genocide in Darfur in Western Sudan against three African peoples, killing at least 400,00 and raping and kidnapping millions more.

The RSF leader, self promoted General Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, aka 'Hemedti' is conducting his latest campaign in similar disgusting vein while pocketing a rumoured $50m a month from the goldmines in north Darfur. the rival SAF has also being accused of atrocities - but given the option, terrified civilians tend to flee the RSF to reach relative sanctuary of army controlled territory.

Last year, the UN Security Council described claims of UAE involvement with the RSF as 'credible'. The UK has criticised 'both sides', while staying silent about the Emiratis. UK foreign secretary David Lammys 15 April peace summit was a dismal failure. while the global community maintains the taboo, all the hand wringing in the world wont end this stupid war.

PE 1649
 
Salaam

Another update

Blurb

As a new gold rush takes over the world, driving up the price of gold to historic levels, the UAE has strategically turned itself into a global hub for gold, and gold laundering.And it's done this partly through financing civil war in Africa, and in particular, Sudan, where a brutal all our war has waged for two years between the country’s military and a rogue mercenary army that’s figured out how to exchange gold for weapons.This is that story.

 

Similar Threads

Back
Top