I wonder about such punishments as beheading, crucifixion, lashing and stoning in Islam. Are those actually 'minimum sentences' prescribed by God? Whereby the judge needs to do it that way when someone is found guilty? Or are those maximum sentences, where the judge still has leeway for alternative punishment?
In the Dutch legal system, for example, we only have maximum sentences, not minimum ones. So the judge can never punish more severely than stated, but can always choose a sentence that is more lenient than what is stated in the law. In the US, on the other hand, there are also often minimum sentences for certain crimes.
I suppose that is also true for Shari'ah courts, right? Adulters need to be stoned when convicted?
In the Dutch legal system, for example, we only have maximum sentences, not minimum ones. So the judge can never punish more severely than stated, but can always choose a sentence that is more lenient than what is stated in the law. In the US, on the other hand, there are also often minimum sentences for certain crimes.
I suppose that is also true for Shari'ah courts, right? Adulters need to be stoned when convicted?