^ Assalamu alaikum,
i agree, it is extremely wrong to say Allah is everywhere ! thats like a hindu belief! but the deleted post of wnb showed that even imam malik read the ayyat confirming that ALlah has risen above his throne, but he rahimahullah then added "but we dont know in what manner"
i hope i havent said anything misleading, and Allah is the one who guides all so may he turn our hearts towards his obedience and give us sufficient 'ilm and understanding to not be mislead
Ameen !
Actually, Imam Malik called
takyeef a bid'ah. Takyeef is asking about the 'howness' of Allah's Attributes. Therefore, this does not mean that Allah is not in any place. Notice that he said Istiwaa is know, yet how is unknown. Why is this? Because we know what Istiwaa means, because as Sufyaan bin Uyaynah said, "everything that Allaah described Himself with in His Book
then it’s recitation is it’s explanation,
without asking how or likening". [Related in ‘Sharh Usul I’tiqaad’ (pg.736), ‘as-Sifaat’ of ad-Daaruqutnee (pg. 61), ‘Dham at-Ta’weel’ (pg. 17 no. 22) via a number of different routes.]
We do not define any of the Attributes of Allah. We confirm what Allah said about Himself, khalas.
Ibn al-Mubaarak said, 'we do nat say as the Jahmiyyah say that Allaah is on the earth, rather He has risen over His Throne.'
And it was said to him, 'how should we know our Lord?' He said,
'above the Heavens, over ('alaa) His Throne'. [See 'Khalq Af'aal al-Ebaad' of Imaam Bukhaaree]
And Ibn Qudaamah said "the way of the salaf is to have faith in the Names and Attributes of Allaah that He has described Himself with in His Revelation, or upon the tongue of His Messenger (SAW) without increasing nor decreasing upon it, nor exceeding the limits, nor explaining them (in the way of the Mu’tazila) nor making ta’weel of them in a way that opposes the literal meaning." [ ‘Dhamm at-Ta’weel’ (pg.11) of ibn Qudaamah al-Maqdisee,]