Was Zul-Qarnain Alexander the Great?

Laith Al-Doory

Well-known member
Messages
53
Reaction score
4
Up until relatively recently, most Muslims have always assumed Zul-Qarnain (the two horned one) to be Alexander the Great, who was often portrayed in classical art, not to mention Greek coinage, wearing a two-horned helmet. The Qur’an only refers to the most important characters by name, and Zul-Qarnain was likely a term used by Arabs to describe Alexander the Great before the advent of Islam.

‘Islamic fundamentalists’ regard such a notion as a source of embarrassment, for Alexander the great is inextricably linked with the European Enlightenment and the spread of Helenic ideas across much of the ancient world as a result of his monumental military campaign. However, as the Arabs were the effective inheritors of the Graeco-Roman civilization, Enlightenment thinking was to flower in the Khaliphate before it was ever to re-emerge in Europe, which was plunged into a Christian Dark Age. As Islam was originally a religion of science and tolerance, Enlightenment thinking has more in common with Islam than it does with Christianity.

According to the Qur’an, Zul-Qarnain was guided, and this Alexander certainly was, according to historical accounts, by his many visits to oracles. This same evidence is used by ‘Islamic fundamentalists’ to argue that Alexander was a polytheist and therefore could not be referred to, as he is in the Qur’an, as a believer. However, Alexander was a student of Aristotle, who was himself a monotheist and coined the term ‘prime mover.’ Also, ancient Greek Hermetic doctrine, like that of the Jews, describes a universal God that can manifest in many forms.

The Father of all things, the Word being Life and Light, brought forth Man, like unto Himself, whom He loved as His own child, for he was beautiful beyond compare, having the image of his Father.”
 
:sl:

I would kind of doubt that. Alexander is not his name either. It came from what the Arab speakers of the time called him and that was his Arabic title "Al es Kandra." I have heard several versions of what the name meant. Some quite derogatory. When I was in Morocco I had quite a few people tell me that the best English translation of "Al es Kandra" is "The Gay One" which was in references to the his Soldiers preference for young boys. In Morocco they often used the name very similar to how we use the term Bogey Man in the west. (at least when I lived there)


Wikki does differ with me considerably over that:

The name was one of the titles ("epithets") given to the Greek goddess Hera and as such is usually taken to mean "one who comes to the aid of warriors." In the Iliad, the character Paris is known also as Alexander. The name's popularity was spread throughout the Hellenistic world by the military conquests of King Alexander III of Macedon, commonly known as "Alexander the Great" (Μέγας Αλέξανδρος).

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander
 
No doubt Alexander wasn't exactly a hero to the Persians, Arabs, Egyptians, and Indians he conquered.
 
I still believe him to be prophet Solomon PBUH.. he was the only one who understood and could communicate in several languages, who could travel faster than the speed of light, and he was the one who had an incomparable kingdom and army... but given all the replies I have received as per regard to the topic.. my inference is nothing more than suppositions... one thing for sure, Zho El Qarnyen was a pious man ( a man of G-D) very contrary to Cyrus and Alexander the great.. We'll have to be content not knowing until there is some sort of Archeological find, or until Gog and Magog are set loose? I don't want to be around for such an event though.....

this website is great if you can unencrypt it http://www.alassrar.com/sub.asp?page1=derasat1-- if you can't then just read the introduction...
 
if you read ibn katirs tafsir, you will see that dhul qarnayn was actually alive during abrahams time and performed the hajj with abraham, obviously that isnt alexander. :)
 
Also it is historicaly known that Alexander died at a very young age. Not more than 21 years old. One problem is there has been a long line of people called Alexander. The Earliest Known going back to 1280 BC.

* Alaksandu, ca. 1280 BC
* Alexander of Corinth, 10th king of Corinth (816-791 BC)
* Alexander I of Macedon
* Alexander of Pherae despot of Pherae between 369 and 358 BC
* Alexander I of Epirus king of Epirus about 342 BC
* Alexander II of Epirus king of Epirus 272 BC
* Alexander II of Macedon
* Alexander the Great (Alexander III of Macedon), King of Macedon, 336–323 BC
* Alexander IV of Macedon
* Alexander Balas, ruler of the Seleucid kingdom of Syria between 150 and 146 BC
* Alexander Severus, (208–235), Roman Empire

[edit] Middle Ages

* Alexander, Byzantine Emperor (912–913)
* Alexander I of Scotland (c. 1078–1124)
* Alexander II of Scotland (1198–1249)
* Alexander Nevsky (1220–1263), Grand Prince of Novgorod and Vladimir
* Alexander III of Scotland (1241–1286)
* Aleksander (1338-before 1386), prince of Podolia (son of Narymunt)
* Sikandar Butshikan, Sultan of Kashmir (1389–1413)
* Alexandru cel Bun, voivode of Moldavia (1400–1432)
* Skenderbeg (1405–1468), prince of Albania
* Alexandru I Aldea, ruler of the principality of Wallachia (1431–1436)
* Eskender, Emperor of Ethiopia (1472–1494)
* Alexander of Poland (1461-1506), king of Poland
* Alexandru Lăpuşneanu, voivode of Moldavia (1552–1561 and 1564–1568)
* Sikandar Shah Suri, Shah of Delhi (1555)
* Sikandar Lodhi, Sultan of Delhi (16th Century)



Like with the Cesears it is difficult to tell when one died and another took the title as they were all called simply Cesear. A few exceptions, Julius, Augustus, Octavius
 
He was either 32 or 33 when he died.

I just noticed my error. It was said he cried when he was 21 because he had no more worlds to conquer. That was were I remembered the 21 from.

But, you are correct about his age at death. He was ruler for 13 years and he had become ruler at about the age of 18.
 
The view that Alexander was indeed Dhul-Qarnayn isn't the Orthodox view.

That was the view of many Islamic scholars for many hundreds of years after the time of Mohammed. It plainly is the orthodox view. If Alexander the Great is not Zul-Qarnain then who is the Qur'an refering to? Any other candidates such as Cyrus or Solomon are anything but orthodox.
 
Pickthal 18:97] And (Gog and Magog) were not able to surmount, nor could they pierce (it).

قَالَ هَذَا رَحْمَةٌ مِّن رَّبِّي فَإِذَا جَاء وَعْدُ رَبِّي جَعَلَهُ دَكَّاء وَكَانَ وَعْدُ رَبِّي حَقًّا {98}
[Pickthal 18:98] He said: This is a mercy from my Lord; but when the promise of my Lord cometh to pass, He will lay it low, for the promise of my Lord is true.

It was said of alex that "he insisted on his effigy being put in each temple of the people he conquered" -- does that sound like someone who would make mention of mercy from his lord or states the promise of the lord is true? besides this verse 84.18

إِنَّا مَكَّنَّا لَهُ فِي الأَرْضِ وَآتَيْنَاهُ مِنْ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ سَبَبًا --​
leads me to believe that he might have been Solomon PBUH--- from Suret Al-kahf 84] Verily We established his power on earth, and We gave him the ways and the means to all ends.

[85] One (such) way he followed--

I don't know of a prophet or a Man of G-D more established on earth than Solmon PBUH,(with ways and means to all ends) his kingdom shall not be bequeathed to another after him--- Anyhow I don't want to impose that belief on others since no one is sure and all are speculating-- I am willing to accept him as simply Zho El-Qarnyen... but not someone who is a complete Hedonist like Alex who cried when there was no more of the world to be conquered!
:w:
 
Tafsir Al-Jalalyn

And they, the Jews, question you concerning Dhū'l-Qarnayn, whose name was Alexander; he was not a prophet. Say: 'I shall recite, relate, to you a mention, an account, of him', of his affair.

Why was he blessed then? if he wasnt muslim.
 
where did you get this addendum of his name was Alex? are you kidding me? I just quoted you the verses from the Quran... no mention of Alexander.. since prophet Mohammed PBUH didn't mention who he was by name, it isn't up to someone to pass some random fatwa ( As-sahaba) in the days of the prophet would be sweating not wanting to answer a scholarly question off the top of their head lest they commit a great sin of passing wrong information, and would try to pass it to one of them who was more scholarly ( now a days everyone is a grand mufti?) ... in my very non scholarly opinion I believe the description fits more prophet Solomon than Alex in terms of piety and means of travel and having all means to an end... but in no way is that an assertion it is a speculation to which I deeply apologize if wrong-- but where do you come up with this nonsense of him being Alex.. when clearly in the Quran it is mentioned that he is a man of G-D, who spoke of the lord's mercy...

peace!
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top