Washington Mall shooter was Turkish

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustafa16
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 11
  • Views Views 2K
:bism: (In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful)

:sl: (Peace be upon you)

It doesn't matter. By the time the media is done with this news story, he'll not come out looking any better. He's a mass murderer and the salient point is he's Muslim and that will be the end of what anyone wants to know or understand. And yes, we're heading towards a Donald Trump presidency.

Anyway, I'm so tired with all this stupidity.

There's going to come a breaking point at some point; and I think America's headed that way: I mean how far are we expected non-Muslims to tolerate this type of nonsense before they start attacking anyone who even "looks Muslim"? Muslims are probably going to have to start hiding their faith from public view if this keeps up, and Allah knows best (and may Allah forgive me if I said anything incorrect).

I'm just so tired. Allah knows what is in store for us, and we're going to have to really and truly place our trust in Allah.

http://heavy.com/news/2016/09/casca...hooter-burlington-washington-wa-seattle-isis/

it does not appear to be isis related.....he was said to have shouted his ex girlfriend's name before shooting, and there is nothing on his facebook page which suggests he is a terrorist....

:wa: (And peace be upon you)
 
I mean how far are we expected non-Muslims to tolerate this type of nonsense before they start attacking anyone who even "looks Muslim"?
They will not do that. If the feminist State allows the men to assert themselves, then these men will soon seek to rule over the women again. That would put an end to the feminist State. Hence, the feminist State will not allow it. At the same time, the feminist State is wary of recruiting too many men, tasked to assert themselves, because that would invariably lead to the same problem. Therefore, getting non-Muslim men to attack Muslim men would trigger an insurmountable contradiction within the feminist State. They will only do that, if it is very easy to do. Otherwise, they won't. So, if you make it even a little bit difficult to do, they will already not do it.

I suspect that the only way for anybody to trigger this kind of confrontation, would be to talk the Muslims into doing that. That would be quite hard too, because most Muslims are aware of the difference in birth rate and the fact that time and demographics play to the advantage of the Muslims. The longer the Muslims delay such confrontation, the more likely they would win, when such confrontation eventually takes place anyway. That explains why there is a strong undercurrent in the Muslim community that understandably does not want this. Seriously, there are a lot of Muslims who will be angry with you, if you try to talk them into things like that. They may even repudiate you.

The phenomenon of extreme individuals in the Muslim community, attacking pagan populations, mostly exists to keep Muslims and pagans separate, and to prevent both sides from making too much friends with each other. It keeps Muslims distinct and segregated in order to prevent them from adopting pagan views. The few extreme individuals occasionally popping up, are in fact an intractable problem that purposely arises in order to keep festering and to prevent itself from being solved. The more that Muslims are perceived to be making friends with pagans, the more that the problem will fester, and if the problem accidentally did get solved, it would later on just re-emerge in a different form or shape.
 
When will we reach the Meccan to Medinah migration phase?

It is interesting, in the Prophet :saws1: time, the disbelievers' fitnah caused them to migrate in the end.

Now it seems to be us Muslims, ourselves. This is a hypothese. So it is more of a inner battle....... Or is it?
 
Now it seems to be us Muslims, ourselves. This is a hypothese. So it is more of a inner battle....... Or is it?

Muslims are quick to believe the mainstream media when such events occur and are blamed on the Muslims. Other group quick to believe them are your mainstream news watchers. The other non-Muslims who don't subscribe to the mainstream news have grown skeptic over all these "muslim only" attacks happening and are quick to question it and the culprits behind it, maybe we, too, should not blindly believe everything said about us?
 
Last edited:
Oh, he was a Turkish? Then he must to be also a Muslim, right? This means he is a terrorist, his action was a terrorist act and his aim was attack against the Western civilization in general.

So simple.
 
Oh, he was a Turkish? Then he must to be also a Muslim, right? This means he is a terrorist, his action was a terrorist act and his aim was attack against the Western civilization in general.

So simple.

Is this sarcasm?
 
im pretty sure it was

Yeah. No different from saying,

Oh, he is white? he must be a terrorist then......... Lives in US? Ah, the people of Freedom who torture for fun..... definitely an act of terrorism. Donald Trump Supporter? A vocal one amongst the terrorists......... Always on witch hunt after people of different colour, them racists.......
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top