Takumi
IB Veteran
- Messages
- 633
- Reaction score
- 140
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Wouldn't all these burning and violent emphasize the notion that Islam DOES allow violence in ANY circumstance?
The prophet bled and had to be shielded by his adopted son when he wanted the people of Taif to help him, and the angels [mind you, the angels] came down to offer to obliterate the town. What did he do?
If whatever has been happening around us is anything to go by, I'd assume, he'd just give the order to destroy.
What did he do? Do some reading and you'll surely find out.
Defacing, dissing and humiliating the prophet is not new. Al Quran documented the harsh words that he had received. While being called a poet and a magician probably not serious to us, but for people whose pride evolved around honor, trust and eloquence, such names were a disgrace to our beloved prophet. Still, did he decree a fatwa on destroying the house of these people?
In fact, when Fathul Makkah happened, he had all the liberty to cut off the heads of his opressors but instead, he made a public announcement to forgive them and honor Abu Sufyan, by making Abu Sufyan's house as a place of sanctuary.
The nubuwwah [prophethood] of Muhammad is to save people from hellfire and and as a blessing to this ummah. Not a curse or a burden.
I'm totally surprised, I have yet to hear or read about any fatwa from our scholars saying that , yeah, that's what we're going to do, burn the embassies, in fact, the prominent Qardawi had called to denounce this violent reciprocation.
If someone has any link, please provide them, I'd love to read about what the scholars have to say.
The prophet bled and had to be shielded by his adopted son when he wanted the people of Taif to help him, and the angels [mind you, the angels] came down to offer to obliterate the town. What did he do?
If whatever has been happening around us is anything to go by, I'd assume, he'd just give the order to destroy.
What did he do? Do some reading and you'll surely find out.
Defacing, dissing and humiliating the prophet is not new. Al Quran documented the harsh words that he had received. While being called a poet and a magician probably not serious to us, but for people whose pride evolved around honor, trust and eloquence, such names were a disgrace to our beloved prophet. Still, did he decree a fatwa on destroying the house of these people?
In fact, when Fathul Makkah happened, he had all the liberty to cut off the heads of his opressors but instead, he made a public announcement to forgive them and honor Abu Sufyan, by making Abu Sufyan's house as a place of sanctuary.
The nubuwwah [prophethood] of Muhammad is to save people from hellfire and and as a blessing to this ummah. Not a curse or a burden.
I'm totally surprised, I have yet to hear or read about any fatwa from our scholars saying that , yeah, that's what we're going to do, burn the embassies, in fact, the prominent Qardawi had called to denounce this violent reciprocation.
If someone has any link, please provide them, I'd love to read about what the scholars have to say.
Last edited: