We have new king!!!

All ordinary people dislike the "royalties" as we believe that all human being are equal.

But, we need monarch because, they're stabilizing factor of Malaysia. The King, is the protector of Islam and Muslims.

If the monarchy system abolished, there'll be riots etc. The Nationalists and Islamists are supporters of the King. And nobody dares to oppose the King. Plus, our kings are nice... and the new one, his Sultana wears hijab.
 
I dont know whether he shave or not....

He's 44, the second youngest YDPA (PAramount ruler) ever elected (we have 9 sultans, which only one elected as YDPA for 5 years term)

There's rumours that he's pro-PAS (Pan Malaysian Islamic Party)... but .. it just a rumors...
 
yeah...

Duli Yang Maha Mulia Al Wathiqu Billah Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin Ibni Almarhum Sultan Mahmud Al Muktafi Billah Shah, DKT, DKR, DMN, SUMZ, SSMT, SPMT, DK (State of Perlis), DK (State of Johor), DKMB (Brunei), DK (State of Perak), DK (State of Negeri Sembilan), DK (State of Kedah), DK (State of Kelantan), DK (State of Selangor), SPMJ, Commandeur de la Legion D'honneur (France)

so....................... long...(including his titles);D
 
I think figurehead monarchies are actually a good thing in many cases. There is alot of history and culture surrounding any monarchy, yes some of it isn't good, but not all bad either. As long as the monarchy isn't really a monarch, I don't see any reason to wipe that away like it didn't exist. It is an important part of the history of Great Britain, and I'm sure this monarchy is very important to the history of Malaysia.
 
Keltoi said:
I think figurehead monarchies are actually a good thing in many cases. There is alot of history and culture surrounding any monarchy, yes some of it isn't good, but not all bad either. As long as the monarchy isn't really a monarch, I don't see any reason to wipe that away like it didn't exist. It is an important part of the history of Great Britain, and I'm sure this monarchy is very important to the history of Malaysia.
Click to expand...

Of course the monarchs are important... the Malays never live without a king.... they're used fo having kings.
 
Muslim monarch ruling under the terms of shariah
The title carries moral weight and religious authority, as the ruler's role was defined in the Qur'an. The Sultan however was not a religious teacher himself.

The first to carry the title of 'Sultan' was the Turkmen chief Mahmud of Ghazni (ruled 998 - 1030). Later, 'Sultan' became the usual title of rulers of Seljuk and Ottoman Turks and Ayyubid and Mamluk rulers in Egypt. In the later stages Sultan was used mostly for the wives of the emperor. The spiritual validation of the title was well illustrated by the fact that it was the shadow Caliph in Cairo that bestowed the title "Sultan" on Murad I, the third ruler of the emerging Ottoman Empire in 1383; its earlier leaders had been Beys or Emirs.

At later stages, lesser rulers assumed the style "sultan", as was the case for the earlier leaders of today's royal family of Morocco. Today, only the Sultan of Oman, the Sultan of Brunei, and some titular sultans in the southern Philippines, Java, and in the former Malay States which are now part of Malaysia still use the title. The sultan's domain is properly called a sultanate. A feminine form, used by Westerners, is Sultana or Sultanah; the very styling misconstrues the roles of wives of sultans. In a similar usage, the wife of a German Field-Marshal might be styled Feldmarschallin (in French, similar constructions of the type madame la maréchalle are quite common).

Among those modern hereditary rulers who wish to emphasize their secular authority under the rule of law, the term is gradually being replaced by 'king'.
Click to expand...

some info i got it from wiki. please correct it if its wrong...

btw....how old is the King. He looks so young.
 
Dawud_uk said:
how can someone put themselves down as a nationalist, or indeed a republician and still a muslim at the same time?

that is just a plane old oxymoron, that is putting two words together that dont belong together and so dont make sense. its like people who claim to be a muslim communist, you cant do it.

like nationalism or such like.

either you are a muslim who believes all to be equal except in taqwa and action, or you are a nationalist who believes some are better than others or more worthy of love or help than others simply because of colour or race.
either you are a person who submits to Allah, or you are a person to submits to shaitan and follows man made systems
same with republicanism... either you are a muslim who believes shariah is correct, kalafate is correct, or you are a republician who believes a man made system of government and law is better.

assalaamu alaykum,
Abu Abdullah
Click to expand...

Good Ans MasAllaah..

either we submits to Allah, or we are submits to shaitan.

one simple thing people must understand. All man and woman is equal. All are the same creation of Allaah (SWT).
so how come a man ruled others and himself by his or other man made thought where his creator gave clear indication.

We all say in every where Allaahu Akbar. (Allaah is most great)
Non muslim also say God is almighty/all powerful.

but in action we do exactly opposite and create other things most great/GOD (ILAAH).

We must not forget Allaah (God) never forgive shirk (creating partner beside Allaah).

None has the right to be worship beside Allaah (GOD).

May Allaah guide us.
 
i_m_tipu said:
Good Ans MasAllaah..

either we submits to Allah, or we are submits to shaitan.

one simple thing people must understand. All man and woman is equal. All are the same creation of Allaah (SWT).
so how come a man ruled others and himself by his or other man made thought where his creator gave clear indication.

We all say in every where Allaahu Akbar. (Allaah is most great)
Non muslim also say God is almighty/all powerful.

but in action we do exactly opposite and create other things most great/GOD (ILAAH).

We must not forget Allaah (God) never forgive shirk (creating partner beside Allaah).

None has the right to be worship beside Allaah (GOD).

May Allaah guide us.
Click to expand...

So when David and Solomon became Kings .. they're not rightful?
 
north_malaysian said:
So when David and Solomon became Kings .. they're not rightful?
Click to expand...

don't understand why you ask this question.

David and Solomon run by the law of Allaah(God). and Allaah make them established in that way(like kingship).

kingship is a system like khalifa.
Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) said only khalifa is his Suceesors.
so Allaah make us (Ummat of Muhammad (pbuh)) established in khalifa system.

it does not matter if he is a king or kalifah or imam or a simple general person not obey the law of Allaah or implement it intentionally can not call himself Muslim.
 
Don't believe in kings or queens, just rubish. One man's say shouldn't be the law.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top