One simple Q: If all shias are kafir then why they are found as the narrators in sihah sitta.. Even in bukhari, muslims? Why muhaddisin of ilm ar rijal declared several of them as RELIABLE AND TRUSTWORTHY....??? Do you know all this or this aspect is unknown to you...?I am telling you that 14 centuries of `Ulamaa-e-Haqq have unanimously declared enmity towards the Shi`as. Not one `Aalim from those 14 centuries of true Islaamic scholarship ever called for unity with the Raafidhah. Unity with the Raafidhah is a newly invented 21st century belief. All newly invented beliefs are Baatil. The Deen of Islaam was completed 14 centuries ago. It didn't get completed in the 14th century. Also, we don't accept any additions, subtractions or alterations to that Deen which was perfected by Allaah Ta`aalaa 14 centuries ago. Once something becomes perfect, you do not add to it, or subtract from it, or alter anything of it. If you do so, then you action implies that you do not regard it as being perfect, because something that is perfect does not get changed. If it needs to be changed, it isn't perfect. So whoever regards the Deen as having not been perfected already 14 centuries ago has rejected the Qur'aan, because that is what Allaah Ta`aalaa says in the Qur'aan. And whoever rejects the Qur'aan is a Kaafir.Look how ridiculous this whole situation is. I am telling you what the `Ulamaa for 1,400 years have been saying, generation after generation after generation, and I'm regarded as the "stranger" who's spreading some weird views no one's heard about. Meanwhile, the ones who are actually spreading weird views which only originated in this belated 21st century, they are regarded as the ones spreading the true Islaam. What a joke. If you had studied the true history of Islaam in totality, you would laugh at it. The people calling for unity with the Raafidhah are calling for a version of Islaam OTHER than what the Salaf of this Ummah were upon. Say it as it is. No beating around the bush.
Last edited: