Weak Hadith Compilation

Another hadiith which is often narrated by certain sects in our masaajid which is weak is the following

ما من رجل بار ينظر إلى والديه أو والدته نظرة رحمة ، إلا كتب الله عز وجل تلك النظرة حجة متقبلة مبرورة ، قالوا : يا رسول الله ، وإن نظر في اليوم مائة مرة ؟ قال : الله أكبر من ذلك

There is no man who looks at his parents with a look of mercy except that Allaah writes for him the reward of a complete accepted Hajj because of that glance. They asked: O Messenger of Allaah what if he looks at them 100 times in a day.

He has been attributed to have said: Allaah is greater than that.


The hadith is weak.


We live in an era where people have no shame. They are intellectually dishonest. They narrate weak ahadiith without even informing their audience that these hadiith are weak so they may have been said or may not have or may contain errors. They don't even mention the chain of narrators. This was a grave error among the scholars of the past. They always mentioned the hadiith with the chain so that the other person could verify the hadiith. Today - in an era of extreme ignorance - people just like to take the spot on the pulpit and tell their audience half the story.


This hadiith contains
صالح بن موسى وهو متروك

al-Haythami said:

He is abandoned.

​

Imagine having a narrator who has been abandoned by the scholars of hadiith and yet you narrate that hadiith without informing your audience that about this. How horrible!

The Hadiith has four routes all of which are extremely weak with one of the routes having the following liar in it!!!!

نهشل بن سعيد


Be very careful when you hear someone narrating a hadiith. Always confirm its authenticity.

- - - Updated - - -

Alamgir said:
Asalamu Alaikum

While we're on the topic of weak ahadith, it's worth mentioning that the story about Rasulullah (Peace Be Upon Him) visiting an old sick lady who used to throw rubbish on him is completely fabricated.
Click to expand...

Yes. That has no basis.
 
Another hadith which has no basis which those who sit on the pulpits in our masaajid love to spread among ppl is that of the Jewish neighbor who would throw garbage in front of the door of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam). Then, he fell sick and the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) inquired about him.


This one is not just weak. Rather, it has no basis at all. Yet, they sit on the pulpits and spread it among ppl. They even have it written down in the books of the school curriculum in countries like Pakistan.

And along these lines is the following which is spread among ppl. This narration has no basis either. Yet, certain sects love to confuse ppl with it.
​


امرأة عجوز في زمن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ، هربت من مكة خوفا مما سمعته عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم . وحدث أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم رآها - وكانت تريد أن ترفع بعض الأشياء لتحملها أثناء محاولتها حملها - فلما رأت منه ذلك دخلت في الإسلام


There was an old woman during the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam). She was fleeing from Makkaah out of fear of what she had heard about the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam). The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) saw her and she needed certain of her things to be carried.

He (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) carried them for her.

She told him he was a wonderful person and so she warns him against this man called Muhammad. She said whoever listens to him becomes a Muslim. She told him to be careful of him. When she reached where she had to reach and the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) put down her things, she said you are so nice.

What is your name?

He said I am the Muhammad you were talking about. She became Muslim upon hearing that.



No basis. It is not present in the books of hadiith. It has no chain! Yet, these sects will tell you this weak and possibly fabricated incident for generations.


Do not forget what the Salaf said:

The chain of narrators is the specialty of this Ummah. Had it not been for the chain, anyone would have said what they willed to say
​


We live in a horrible era where ppl say whatever makes their heart happy. They have strayed from the path of the Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them) who were so cautious in narrating hadiith even though they spent every minute with the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).

Today, we have those who oppose the methodology of the Companions and the Salaf and want to not only narrate weak hadiith but want to justify it.

May Allaah save us from straying from the path of the Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them all).

 
أَنَّ رَجُلًا جَاءَ إلَى عُمَرَ يَشْكُو إلَيْهِ خُلُقَ زَوْجَتِهِ فَوَقَفَ بِبَابِهِ يَنْتَظِرُهُ فَسَمِعَ امْرَأَتَهُ تَسْتَطِيلُ عَلَيْهِ بِلِسَانِهَا وَهُوَ سَاكِتٌ لَا يَرُدُّ عَلَيْهَا ، فَانْصَرَفَ الرَّجُلُ قَائِلًا : إذَا كَانَ هَذَا حَالَ أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ فَكَيْفَ حَالِي ؟ فَخَرَجَ عُمَرُ فَرَآهُ مُوَلِّيًا فَنَادَاهُ : مَا حَاجَتُك يَا أَخِي ؟ فَقَالَ : يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ جِئتُ أَشْكُو إلَيْك خُلُقَ زَوْجَتِي وَاسْتِطَالَتَهَا عَلَيَّ فَسَمِعْتُ زَوْجَتَكَ كَذَلِكَ فَرَجَعْت وَقُلْت : إذَا كَانَ هَذَا حَالَ أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ مَعَ زَوْجَتِهِ فَكَيْفَ حَالِي ؟ فَقَالَ لَهُ عُمَرُ : إنَّمَا تَحَمَّلْتُهَا لِحُقُوقٍ لَهَا عَلَيَّ : إنَّهَا طَبَّاخَةٌ لِطَعَامِي خَبَّازَةٌ لِخُبْزِي غَسَّالَةٌ لِثِيَابِي رَضَّاعَةٌ لِوَلَدِي ، وَلَيْسَ ذَلِكَ بِوَاجِبٍ عَلَيْهَا ، وَيَسْكُنُ قَلْبِي بِهَا عَنْ الْحَرَامِ ، فَأَنَا أَتَحَمَّلُهَا لِذَلِكَ ، فَقَالَ الرَّجُلُ : يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَكَذَلِكَ زَوْجَتِي ؟ قَالَ : فَتَحَمَّلْهَا يَا أَخِي فَإِنَّمَا هِيَ مُدَّةٌ يَسِيرَةٌ .

A man came to Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) to complain about the manners of his wife. When he reached he stood at his door waiting.

He heard his (i.e. Umar's) wife talking to him sharply with her tongue. He was quiet and did not respond to her.

The man left thinking: If this is the state of the Commander of the believers than what about my state?




This is a baseless narration. It has no chain!

Yet, they sit on pulpits in our masaajid and narrate this!

No chain.


The Salaf said:

If it had not been for the chain anyone would have narrated whatever they wanted!


Be ware of what people tell you. Always check the authenticity of what is being narrated to you.

This baseless and chainless narration first appeared in the following books

حاشيته على شرح المنهج
تنبيه الغافلين
الزواجر


None of these books contain any chain!

Instead of acting responsibly and not promoting such baseless narrations, we have people sit on the pulpits in our masaajid and narrate this to the people.


How far they have strayed from the path of the Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them).

Continue to speak the truth as it enrages the hypocrites.
 
ZeeshanParvez said:
أَنَّ رَجُلًا جَاءَ إلَى عُمَرَ يَشْكُو إلَيْهِ خُلُقَ زَوْجَتِهِ فَوَقَفَ بِبَابِهِ يَنْتَظِرُهُ فَسَمِعَ امْرَأَتَهُ تَسْتَطِيلُ عَلَيْهِ بِلِسَانِهَا وَهُوَ سَاكِتٌ لَا يَرُدُّ عَلَيْهَا ، فَانْصَرَفَ الرَّجُلُ قَائِلًا : إذَا كَانَ هَذَا حَالَ أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ فَكَيْفَ حَالِي ؟ فَخَرَجَ عُمَرُ فَرَآهُ مُوَلِّيًا فَنَادَاهُ : مَا حَاجَتُك يَا أَخِي ؟ فَقَالَ : يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ جِئتُ أَشْكُو إلَيْك خُلُقَ زَوْجَتِي وَاسْتِطَالَتَهَا عَلَيَّ فَسَمِعْتُ زَوْجَتَكَ كَذَلِكَ فَرَجَعْت وَقُلْت : إذَا كَانَ هَذَا حَالَ أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ مَعَ زَوْجَتِهِ فَكَيْفَ حَالِي ؟ فَقَالَ لَهُ عُمَرُ : إنَّمَا تَحَمَّلْتُهَا لِحُقُوقٍ لَهَا عَلَيَّ : إنَّهَا طَبَّاخَةٌ لِطَعَامِي خَبَّازَةٌ لِخُبْزِي غَسَّالَةٌ لِثِيَابِي رَضَّاعَةٌ لِوَلَدِي ، وَلَيْسَ ذَلِكَ بِوَاجِبٍ عَلَيْهَا ، وَيَسْكُنُ قَلْبِي بِهَا عَنْ الْحَرَامِ ، فَأَنَا أَتَحَمَّلُهَا لِذَلِكَ ، فَقَالَ الرَّجُلُ : يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَكَذَلِكَ زَوْجَتِي ؟ قَالَ : فَتَحَمَّلْهَا يَا أَخِي فَإِنَّمَا هِيَ مُدَّةٌ يَسِيرَةٌ .

A man came to Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) to complain about the manners of his wife. When he reached he stood at his door waiting.

He heard his (i.e. Umar's) wife talking to him sharply with her tongue. He was quiet and did not respond to her.

The man left thinking: If this is the state of the Commander of the believers than what about my state?




This is a baseless narration. It has no chain!

Yet, they sit on pulpits in our masaajid and narrate this!

No chain.


The Salaf said:

If it had not been for the chain anyone would have narrated whatever they wanted!


Be ware of what people tell you. Always check the authenticity of what is being narrated to you.

This baseless and chainless narration first appeared in the following books

حاشيته على شرح المنهج
تنبيه الغافلين
الزواجر


None of these books contain any chain!

Instead of acting responsibly and not promoting such baseless narrations, we have people sit on the pulpits in our masaajid and narrate this to the people.


How far they have strayed from the path of the Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them).

Continue to speak the truth as it enrages the hypocrites.
Click to expand...
[emoji20] [emoji20] [emoji20] [emoji20]
 
Talking in the masjid eats up good deeds like fire eats up wood


Baatil!

This narration has no basis



Haafiz al-'iraaqi said:

I have not found any basis for it


Abd al-Wahhaab bin Taqi al-Diin al-Subki said:

I did not find any chain for it



Sheikh al-albaani said:

It has no basis
 
Last edited:
Beware of jealousy for it eats up good deeds like fire eats up wood



This hadith is weak.

It has been narrated by an unknown many from Abu Hurairah (may Allaah be pleased with him).

When someone is unknown then we do not know his state. Was he a liar? Was he weak? Hence, such a hadiith is not fit to be spread among the people when you do not know the state of a person.

You could be attributing a lie to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam)


The second version has been reported in Ibn Maajah


That has the following narrator in it

'iisaa bin abii 'iisaa al-hannaaT

He is matruuk (abandoned)



There is no doubt that jealousy is haraam. And it is waajib to be on guard from it. There are other authentic evidences for this.


You don't have to go about spreading weak ahadiith among people to prove this.

 
ZeeshanParvez said:
Beware of jealousy for it eats up good deeds like fire eats up wood



This hadith is weak.

It has been narrated by an unknown many from Abu Hurairah (may Allaah be pleased with him).

When someone is unknown then we do not know his state. Was he a liar? Was he weak? Hence, such a hadiith is not fit to be spread among the people when you do not know the state of a person.

You could be attributing a lie to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam)


The second version has been reported in Ibn Maajah


That has the following narrator in it

'iisaa bin abii 'iisaa al-hannaaT

He is matruuk (abandoned)



There is no doubt that jealousy is haraam. And it is waajib to be on guard from it. There are other authentic evidences for this.


You don't have to go about spreading weak ahadiith among people to prove this.
Click to expand...

Assalamu alaikum

This hadith is Hasan according to ibn Hajr. How can you call it weak?

https://abuaminaelias.com/dailyhadi...-destroys-good-deeds-like-fire-destroys-wood/
 
Last edited:
ZeeshanParvez said:
Beware of jealousy for it eats up good deeds like fire eats up wood



This hadith is weak.

It has been narrated by an unknown many from Abu Hurairah (may Allaah be pleased with him).

When someone is unknown then we do not know his state. Was he a liar? Was he weak? Hence, such a hadiith is not fit to be spread among the people when you do not know the state of a person.

You could be attributing a lie to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam)


The second version has been reported in Ibn Maajah


That has the following narrator in it

'iisaa bin abii 'iisaa al-hannaaT

He is matruuk (abandoned)



There is no doubt that jealousy is haraam. And it is waajib to be on guard from it. There are other authentic evidences for this.


You don't have to go about spreading weak ahadiith among people to prove this.
Click to expand...
Dear bro u r going high in this matter. I know u dont have hadith knowledge thus plz bro dont say it as a batil. A person in hadith is matrok doesnt mean this hadith is fully fabricated.
In ilm ul hadith not only chain of narrators been disscussed but also the main text been discussed too and after that many many things.
There are many popular people who cut their chain and hide their teachers and directly narates from companions like ibrahim nakheii. He cuts off his teachers about two or one and narrates from companion though no one ever said him he his mutrooq or this or that
Secondly sufyan soori well knwon narrator and he is sahib tadlees too i.e hide his teacher name only.
Its my little advice to not interfere in hadith matters like this.
Remember its known matter in jurisdiction that a simple person if disqualify any hadith is kafir and out of islam while if an alim or scholars disqualify hadith khbr e wahid he is not due to knowledge because he do have other reasons to disqualify or object while a simple person objected on a hafith upon which bases??
Thats why kindly go softly
 
He who sleeps after the Asr prayer and then loses his mind only has himself to blame



Baatil. Fabricated.

This is not even a Hadith!

Yet, you find people spreading this baatil saying among people telling them it is a hadiith

Ibn al-Jawzi and al-Dhahabi both included it among their list of fabricated ahadiith

- - - Updated - - -

The disagreement of my Ummah is a Rahmah



This is baatil.

al-albaani included it among fabricated ahadiith

Ibn Hazm said it is baatil and a lie.

وقال فيه ابن حزم: باطل مكذوب

- - - Updated - - -

My Companions are like stars. Whichever of them you follow, you will be guided


Ibn Hazm says it is a lie and fabricated. It is baatil and not authentic at all


قال ابن حزم : خبر مكذوب موضوع باطل لم يصح قط."الإحكام في أصول الأحكام"(5/64) و (6/82) . وقال الألباني: موضوع


al-albaani said it is fabricated


It's chain is as follows


سلام بن سليم ، قال : حدثنا الحارث بن غصين ، عن الأعمش ، عن أبي سفيان ، عن جابر


Sallaam bin Sulaim is nothing

Ibn Hibbaan said he would narrate fabricated ahadiith from the reliable ones

Ibn Ma'iin said he is nothing


The other chain is

سليمان ابن أبي كريمة عن جويبر عن الضحاك عن ابن عباس


This chain includes two narrators who are weak

سليمان ابن أبي كريمة
جويبر

The first is weak and latter is matruuk!


As for al-Dahhaak he is ابن مزاحم الهلالي and he did not meet Ibn Abbaas


The other chain is

نعيم ابن حماد حدثنا عبد الرحيم بن زيد العمي عن أبيه عن سعيد بن المسيب عن عمر بن الخطاب

This includes the liar

عبد الرحيم بن زيد العمي


And it also contains نعيم بن حماد who is weak


Imaam Ahmad said: This hadith is not authentic
al-Haafiz Ahmad bin Umaruu bin Abd al-KhaaliQ al-Bazzaar said this is not from the speech of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam)


Ibn Hazm said this is baatil and a lie

Ibn Mulqan said that all of its chains are weak

Ibn al-Qayyim said it has been narrated from routes none of which are established
 
There is no 'i'tikaaf without fasting.






The hadiith has been declared weak by the scholars of hadiith.







However, this is the opinion narrated from Ibn Abbaas, Aishah, and Ibn Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them).







Ali and Ibn Mas'uud (may Allaah be pleased with them) hold the opinion that an 'i'tikaaf without a fast would be valid.







From the Jurists, Abu Hanifah, Maalik, al-Laith, and al-Thawri hold the opinion that a 'i'tikaaf can only be done with a fast while the other opinion is held by Sa'iid bin al-Musayyib, Umar bin Abd al-aziiz, al-Hasan, 'aTaa', Taa'uus, al-Shaafi'i, and 'ishaaQ.







If one was to apply the Juristic principle of exiting the difference of opinion is mustahabb (الخروج من الخلاف مستحب) here then one would fast when he intends to enter a supererogatory 'i'tikaaf.
 
Siting with the poor is humility and it is the best form of al-Jihaad


This is a fabricated hadith!

It contains Muhammad bin al-Husain al-Sulamii al-Suufi.


He would fabricate ahadiith for the Sufis!

كان أبو عبد الرحمن السلمي غير ثقة ، وكان يضع للصوفية الأحاديث

Imagine fabricating ahadiith to support Sufism?!


The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said:

‘Whoever lies upon me intentionally, then let him take his seat in the Fire’.

Sahiih Muslim


Fabricating ahadiith and attributing them to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) is doing exactly that!

He lied knowingly upon the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).

What good was attaining the status of being an Imaam in this temporarily worldly when you ended up doing exactly what the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said would lead you to hell!


May Allaah save us from misguidance


Reference
 
Is this Hadith fabricated or non arurhentix
( allah and the prophet saw are at war with-those that involve in usury, they are have curse on them )can this 7th century phase aspect apply literally to muslims whompurchased homes on a uk based morrgage. Are home biluyera cilursed and is a war deckarwd on them from Allah)

Plesse clarify as it is scary as i am a homeowner too
 
What the Scholars have said about weak hadith and when and if they can be used:


Great hadith experts such as Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn al-Mahdi, ‘Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak said, “When we narrate in regards to the lawful [halal] and unlawful [haram] we exercise extreme strictness and when we narrate in regards to virtuous and the like (stories and narratives) then we are more lenient. (See Suyuti’s Tadrib al-rawi).

We learn from this statement that the scholars were more relaxed in the case of using weak hadith in virtues, but were very strict when it came to aspects of belief or fiqhi rulings. There were also other conditions for accepting weak hadith. For instance, the weakness should not be extreme that it is bordering on fabrication or the hadith should not be a spurious one. Likewise the weak hadith should not contradict an established principle of Shari’a or go against the spirit of the teachings of Islam (See Tadrib al-rawi).

https://islamqa.org/hanafi/qibla-hanafi/35756
 
The ghubaar (dust) of Madinah is a shifaa for leprosy

This has been narrated in:

Akhbaar al-madiina by al-zubair ibn bakkar
al-tibb al-nabawi by abu nu'aim
akhbar qazwin by al-raafi'



People have no shame. They narrate weak hadiith and do not even tell people.


Then, people go and act on the hadith. They do not see any results which are promised in the weak hadiith.

They end up doubting Islam. All because you had a group of people who did not follow the way of the Companions and started narrating weak hadiith and misguiding people.
​


How many people started following a weak hadiith and then saw none of the promised results only to have their Imaan corrupted because a bunch of intellectually dishonest people told them of a weak or fabricated hadith without even telling them it was weak or fabricated!


This is a very weak hadiith.


Let's look at its chains


Chain one

Abu ghaziyyah Muhammad bin Muusaa -> Abd al-aziiz bin 'imraan -> Muhammad bin 'ibraahiim bin 'ismaa'iil bin khaarijah -> Muhammad bin thaabit ibn Qais bin shammaas -> from his father


This is a very weak chain of narrators. It has several defects

Abu ghaziyyah Muhammad bin Muusaa

al-Bukhaari said he is known to narrate munkar ahadiith
Ibn Hibbaan said he would narrate fabricated ahadiith from reliable narrators


Then, we have Abd al-'aziiz bin 'imraan who is matruuk.

Finally, we have Ismaa'iil bin Muhammad bin Thaabit who is unknown.

Along with all of this, this is a Mursal hadith! A mursal hadiith is deemed weak according to the scholars of hadiith.


Now, let's look at the other two diseased chains this hadiith has been narrated from



al-Qaasim bin Abd Allaah al-'Umarii -> Abu Bakr bin Muhammad -> Saalim


This hadith is also mursal for starters.

In addition to it being mursal it has al-Qaasim in it. al-Dhahabi said: Ahmad said: He is a liar who would fabricate hadiith!!!


The next diseased chain is as follows


al-Zubair ibn bakkaar -> Muhammad bin Hasan -> 'ibraahiim

This is a diseased chain

'Ibraahiim in this chain is Ibn Ali bin hasan bin ali bin abi raafi' al-madnii

al-Haafiz said in al-taqriib:

He is weak


Muhammad bin Hasan narrated from him in this diseased chain. He is Ibn Zabaalah

al-Haafiz said in al-taqriib

They labeled him a liar

Abu Daawud al-sijistaanii said he was a liar
al-Dhahabi said: matruuk
al-Daraqutni said: matruuk

As you can see. All the chains are severely weak. None of them can act as shawaahid for others.
​


Do not spread weak hadiith among people unless you inform them. Do not go against the way of the Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them all).


Do not be a cause for ruining someone's Diin. You tell them a very weak hadiith. They think it is authentic because you were intellectually dishonest. They act on it. None of the results come to be. They start doubting hadiith as a whole.


Follow the way of the rightly guided Companions (may Allaah be pleased with them). Narrate only authentic hadiith. Otherwise, have the decency to tell your audience that the hadiith is weak and may be true or may not be true.


Do not play with your Diin. Had it not been for the chain anyone would have said what they willed like people do today.
 
Last edited:
The man who could not say the shahaadatain because his mother was angry with him

The man who could not say the shahaadatain because his mother was angry with him


There was a man during the time of the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) who was in the throes of death for three nights. His wife went and complained to the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) saying that he does not get any relief.

It was said where is his mother?

His mother came and was asked about his state. She said he was one who prayed and did lots of dhikr. It was asked how was he with you?

She said she was not happy with him because when he talked he would pierce her heart with his words.

Wood was ordered and a fire was to be kindled. She asked what is this for?

It was said that he will be thrown into it.

The mother quickly said no I forgive him.

The Companions were sent to the man and he said the shahaadatain and his soul was taken.


This is a baatil narration.
​


People should be ashamed for promoting such baatil narrations among people. Do they forget what the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said:


It was narrated from 'Ali that:

The Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: '"Whoever narrates a Hadith from me thinking it to be false, then he is one of the two liars." (Either the one who invents a lie or the one who repeats it; both are liars).

[Sunan Ibn Maajah]


al-Haithami said that this narration about the man who could not say the shahadaatain because his mother was angry with him has Faa'id 'abu al-'warQaa' and he is matruuk (abandoned)

Imaam al-Bukhaari said: He is munkar al-hadiith!


Can you believe it? The chain has a matruuk and munkar al-hadiith in it and you have these ppl sit on pulpits and shamelessly attribute this baatil narration to the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).


They do not even have the decency to tell their audience about the severe weakness of the chain.


Ahmad bin Hanbal called Faa'id Abu al-warQaa' matruuk al-hadiith!

Yahyaa bin Ma'iin said he was nothing

Ibn Hibbaan said it is not permissible to use him as evidence

Abuu Haatim said he is abandoned!

Ibn Hajar said: Ibn Ma'iin, Abu Haatim, and al-Bukhaari said he was weak and so did Abu Dawud, al-Nasaa'i, al-Tirmidhi, and others. al-Haakim said he narrated fabricated ahaadiith from Ibn Abi 'Awfaa!!!


May Allaah guide us and save us from promoting narrations which are baatil, fabricated, and weak!

May He guide us to the way of the true scholars of this Ummah, the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).

Amiin.
 
One huqb in the Fire?

He who leaves the prayer until its time passes and then makes it up, he will be punished in the Fire for a period of one huqb. One huqb is equal to eighty years and one year is three hundred sixty days and one day is equal to one thousand years.


Baatil!


​

This narration does not even have a chain. Yet, you have certain sects attribute this fabricated narration to the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).


How shameless.


No chain at all!


Ibn al-Mubaraak said: If it were not for the chain anyone would have said what he willed.


And the above is a perfect example. There is no chain. Someone decided to come up with something and said what he willed.


May Allaah guide us and keep us safe from attributing false and weak narrations to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam).
 
This user appears to be a hadith rejector in this thread.

He is showing his hatred for weak hadith but for a Muslim hadith is always respectable whether or not it's sahih.

Acting upon sahih hadith or weak hadith is a different issue.

All his disgusting allegations are applied to all those muhaddisin who included weak hadith in their books. E.g. Imam Bukhari :rh: wrote weak hadith in his other books, besides it, even in sahih bukhari he included many hadith without chain of narrators (taleeqat e Bukhari).

Rejecting hadith is the worst fitnah in this age.

May Allah :swt: protect all of us from this fitnah. Ameen
 
Last edited:

Similar Threads

Back
Top