Western perception of niqaab

[Nσσя'υℓ Jαииαн]

Typical!

Edit: Dang you guys are fast...lol.

 

[Whatsthepoint]

By mutliculturalism you mean the indians,Jews, Muslims and other living within there culture should be outlawed?

No, but its possible, heavily unplasuible though.

 

[Zafran]

All I'm thinking is a stop to (Muslim) immigration and a law that would protect business discriminating niqabis from lawsuits.

what about people with Jackets or shoes (shoe bomber) or bags - those could be a threat - should they also be outlawed in public places and businesses? You also keep using immigartion/multiculturalism as synonmous when they are not - stick with one term because they have different meanings.

so you locked on the muslims - islamaphobic - your panicking again

 

[Whatsthepoint]

what about people with bags - they could be carrying a bomb - or even a jacket - they could have bomb underneath there jacket.

That's true, though at least you can see their face.
I didn't say niqaab should be banned, I said it may be a safety concern, but it shouldn't be banned because of that.
what I'm saying is that private businesses and public institutions should not accomodate to the overly religious.

 

[Whatsthepoint]

what about people with Jackets or shoes (shoe bomber) or bags - those could be a threat - should they also be outlawed in public places and businesses? You also keep using immigartion/multiculturalism as synonmous when they are not - stick with one term because they have different meanings.

so you locked on the muslims - islamaphobic - your panicking again

I told you I'm not against multiculturalism as such!
Muslims are the most numerous, like 10% of the whole population.

 

[Zafran]

That's true, though at least you can see their face.
I didn't say niqaab should be banned, I said it may be a safety concern, but it shouldn't be banned because of that.
what I'm saying is that private businesses and public institutions should not accomodate to the overly religious.

sound french - why not I thought Niqabs were threats - so could Jackets and shoes - what about Nuns?

Has france banned the Niqab?

 

[Whatsthepoint]

did the arabs slaughter and try to get rid of the natives :?

I don't know, but they certainly conquered it.

 

[Zafran]

I don't know, but they certainly conquered it.

like the Normans in 1066.

 

[Whatsthepoint]

sound french - why not I thought Niqabs were threats - so could Jackets and shoes - what about Nuns?

Has france banned the Niqab?

I said safety is not the prime reason why some discrimination of niqaabis should be allowed.

 

[Whatsthepoint]

like the Normans in 1066.

Yep.

 

[Zafran]

I said safety is not the prime reason why some discrimination of niqaabis should be allowed.

You said

what I'm saying is that private businesses and public institutions should not accomodate to the overly religious.

what about Nuns?

as France banned the Niqab do you know? I know its banned the Hijab

 

[Whatsthepoint]

You said



what about Nuns?

as France banned the Niqab do you know? I know its banned the Hijab

Nuns show their face, there's noproblem of identifications or anything.
It banned all religious symbols.

 

[Whatsthepoint]

Typical!

Edit: Dang you guys are fast...lol.

I'm guessing typical! was for me

 

[Zafran]

Nuns show their face, there's noproblem of identifications or anything.
It banned all religious symbols.

If there isnt a security problem whats the point of banning the Niqab whats the reason??? You havnet given one for the ban to happen - IMO if it is going to happen then only for saftey reasons? But then the shoes, Jackets bags etc also should be looked at.
whats your reason??? identification for what?

 

[Whatsthepoint]

If there isnt a security problem whats the point of banning the Niqab whats the reason??? You havnet given one for the ban to happen - IMO if it is going to happen then only for saftey reasons? But then the shoes, Jackets bags etc also should be looked at.
whats your reason??? identification for what?

I'm not saying it should be banned. Niqaabis should be free to walk down the street, but if a bank for instance refused to service them because their face is covered and also refused to provide an all-female identification, the bank should be protected from lawsuits.
That's it.
Additionally, niqaabis inspected by the police despite their innoence shouldn't get any compensation or anything.
The reason for no 2 is safety concern.
And none of the above is gonna happen.

 

[Zafran]

I'm not saying it should be banned. Niqaabis should be free to walk down the street, but if a bank for instance refused to service them because their face is covered and also refused to provide an all-female identification, the bank should be protected from lawsuits.
That's it.
Additionally, niqaabis inspected by the police despite their innoence shouldn't get any compensation or anything.
The reason for no 2 is safety concern.
And none of the above is gonna happen.

Thank God - I disagree with the bank - there are many ways with the bank to check identification - rarely they check the face.

The police is a different matter - that actually goes to safety reasons.

 

[Nσσя'υℓ Jαииαн]

Good job genius! Yes it was for u

 

[Whatsthepoint]

Good job genius! Yes it was for u

Too slow again!:skeleton:

 

[Nσσя'υℓ Jαииαн]

Yea im not really trying to keep up u know....O.O

 

[Whatsthepoint]

Thank God - I disagree with the bank - there are many ways with the bank to check identification - rarely they check the face.

The police is a different matter - that actually goes to safety reasons.

I know, but should they decide to check it - bad luck for the niqaabis.
Of course, no bank would make any fuss over it, but they should be protected in case they do.