τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1345175 said:Harmonization is only needed for the bible on the account of differing stories all completely at odds. If you have a long chain of narrations all attesting to one thing, then there is no need for 'harmonization' we don't call it 'harmonization' we call it 'fabrication'!!
I don't see a need to 'harmonize' given the Quran by an angel. we have the Quran in pur possession and hadith completely different style of writing, the Quran written and spoken so that the most eloquent poets of the time couldn't produce the shortest sura akin to it (being three verses) do we need to see the bee to know where the honey came from? articles of faith need no harmonization, anymore than 'miracles' need harmonization you either believe them or you don't! Nothing is going to be watered down or switched to cater to Hugo or be in concert with Hugo's wants so that all books can be taken down to the lowest common denominator and be akin to the conundrum that is the bible or the christian faith! Muslims have no need to re-write history, they have no need to go into zionist books and change words from Nakbah into denial to suit their purposes and further their agenda: you should start a website on drivel and nonsense.. I think there is a market for that!
I think you are missing the point. The Qu'ran's content cannot be corroborated by anyone, it is technically hearsay and never can be anything else. Secondly, it is absolutely preposterous to even suggest that Muslims have not or cannot manipulate history to their own ends - EVERY Muslim scholar knows this, that is why there is a science of hadith - unless you think that all those thousands of suspect hadith were written by Jews or Christians or little green men? Why don't you go and read what Bukhari has to say and the methods he used?