What role is Pakistan playing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I R Paki
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 51
  • Views Views 6K
The leader of a country has much more on his plate than religious concerns. One can be pious as a saint, and watch the country crumble around him. You have to make choices that will hopefully benefit your people and the country.
It's what the people want right?
 
at the end of the day, how musharraf handled the whole situation was wrong, he should have thought about everyone & not jus himself & his country:D:D
 
hahaahah (fake) :p

yesh they didnt have faith :D thats what i believe!

there are many people that have been succesful fightin agenst enemies, like hezbollah, israel cudnt destroy em, because hezbollah had the true belief & they were fightin for the rite reasons :D:D:D
No Israel didn't do it right
with me in charge there would have been no reason to return to lebanon not unless you're a fan of rocks.
 
No Israel didn't do it right
with me in charge there would have been no reason to return to lebanon not unless you're a fan of rocks.

i neva said israel dun it rite? i sed hezbollah had firm belief in Allah (swt) dats why dey dint loose & israelites cudnt do anytin about them,

with you in charge? well ur not in charge :p so hush :D:D:D lol

wot u mean fan of rocks lol explain matey :D:D:D
 
i neva said israel dun it rite? i sed hezbollah had firm belief in Allah (swt) dats why dey dint loose & israelites cudnt do anytin about them,

with you in charge? well ur not in charge :p so hush :D:D:D lol

wot u mean fan of rocks lol explain matey :D:D:D
fan of rubble, is that better? Meaning there would be a structure taller than 2 feet standing.
 
didnt musharraf overthrow an elected governement? so is he not a terrorist to democracy? so why does the west support him?

In a vote of confidence on January 1, 2004, Musharraf won 658 out of 1,170 votes in the Electoral College of Pakistan, and according to Article 41(8) of the Constitution of Pakistan, was "deemed to be elected" to the office of President until October 2007.
 
In a vote of confidence on January 1, 2004, Musharraf won 658 out of 1,170 votes in the Electoral College of Pakistan, and according to Article 41(8) of the Constitution of Pakistan, was "deemed to be elected" to the office of President until October 2007.

Since he came to power through a coup and is a dictator...how can we be sure that the poll was a fair one and not influenced in anyway?
 
erm :D swiftly movin on :p

so geronimo, what do you think of pakistan overall? as a country? its successes and failures? :D:D:D:D
I don't think of Pakistan at all except in terms of negotiations. I would say we can take all the Jews here in the US from Israel and give that land to the Arabs only if all muslims leave the West and give Pakistan back to India.
 
Salam

Musharaf dont want to push himself to war or conflict. Pakistan is already dealing with kashmir issues from the past and present. Pakistan have nuclear not many western countries confortable seeing Pakistan having nukes. I agree he have been acting towards u.s and u.k, his playing politics for pakistan interest. He dont need to be acting agressive towards u.s and u.k , if he does. He will not have allies backing him or support him from the muslim countries. Its not easy situation, you must think before you do your actions.
 
Last edited:
Since he came to power through a coup and is a dictator...how can we be sure that the poll was a fair one and not influenced in anyway?

Hey I never said I liked Pakistan. I was just pointing out that Musharraf supposidly won an election and no international moderators pointed out any foul play.
 
Hey I never said I liked Pakistan. I was just pointing out that Musharraf supposidly won an election and no international moderators pointed out any foul play.

why should they? is it not in their interest that he is in power?
 
I don't think of Pakistan at all except in terms of negotiations. I would say we can take all the Jews here in the US from Israel and give that land to the Arabs only if all muslims leave the West and give Pakistan back to India.

Where u think all indigenous indians (liek ure self) of america be placed?
 
why should they? is it not in their interest that he is in power?

International observers are from not just the west but a selected number of nuetral countries.

If you want to dispute if the countries are nuetral or not, that is to get deeper than I have time for.

Your welcome to research it though. I would most certainly read any type of information you found.
 
I just asked seeing that u think that all muslims should be in arabia, and pakistan should be given back to india etc......so since u have apoint of view on muslims and others..what ure point of view on ure people?
My people are doing just fine. We have our own land with our own laws. The US government cannot interfer with our affairs unles we say so. As for those living off the reservation we are also doing fine. Most of us are prosperous and love our country. Not all "Indians" fought the white man;)
 
My people are doing just fine. We have our own land with our own laws. The US government cannot interfer with our affairs unles we say so. As for those living off the reservation we are also doing fine. Most of us are prosperous and love our country. Not all "Indians" fought the white man;)

I don't think the issue of fighting the white man really matters. My people did fight the white man for about a century. The issue is what is happening today. I do not feel oppressed. I own my own land, which isn't that great since I have to mow it almost every day. I recieved a college education thanks to the US government(BIA). I don't have many complaints, and what complaints I have don't have anything to do with the white man.

Way off topic....
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top