Why can't atheists just be wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jabeady
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 361
  • Views Views 46K
Once again, not the point.

You thought it was a lot bigger.

Until I informed you otherwise, that is.
Wrong again. I don't care. I never cared. Go find someone who actually wants to fight your strawmen. You and Kritikvernunft are killing all my interest in this thread. I think the two of you have already managed to drive off everyone else.
 
What's your point? Atheism is a minority view? Islam & Christianity are the vast majority? Meh.

Numbers, in this case, mean nothing. Right is right and wrong is wrong, regardless of the numbers involved.

I agree but does that mean you are sure that "no God" is the correct stance? I.e. the right way of thinking.
 
I've seen a lot of things written here about atheism and atheists. The more charitable items suggest that we're mentally or emotionally disturbed, and/or are suffering from some other form of dementia.

Personally, I never really considered the possibility that you religious folk were somehow demented (with some specific exceptions), just mistaken. Why can't you return the favor?

Do You Know that Even Scientists do not Believe in Aethism

One Verse Specially for the Aetheists-

“Do they not think deeply (in their ownselves) about themselves (how Allâh created them from nothing, and similarly He will resurrect them)? Allâh has created not the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them, except with truth and for an appointed term. And indeed many of mankind deny the Meeting with their Lord. (Ar-Rum 30:8)
 
How come you do not believe in the Hereafter, while even this world existed while you and all of creation was at one point, unaware?`

From nothing comes nothing. It is quite logical to think that there is a hereafter. A rather reasonable thing to believe in. Imo.
 
I agree but does that mean you are sure that "no God" is the correct stance? I.e. the right way of thinking.
No, I am not sure. Neither am I sure that Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster do not exist. Is my lack of certainty sufficient reason to declare that they do in fact exist?
 
How come you do not believe in the Hereafter, while even this world existed while you and all of creation was at one point, unaware?
Show me.`

From nothing comes nothing. It is quite logical to think that there is a hereafter. A rather reasonable thing to believe in. Imo.
"He considered his answer carefully. Finally, he said that there was nothing he would like more in the world than to see his mother and father again, but that he had no reason—and no evidence—to support the idea of an afterlife, so he couldn't give in to the temptation. 'Why?' Then he told me, very tenderly, that it can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. You can get tricked if you don't question yourself and others, especially people in a position of authority. He told me that anything that's truly real can stand up to scrutiny." - Sasha Sagan
 
Show me.`

"He considered his answer carefully. Finally, he said that there was nothing he would like more in the world than to see his mother and father again, but that he had no reason—and no evidence—to support the idea of an afterlife, so he couldn't give in to the temptation. 'Why?' Then he told me, very tenderly, that it can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. You can get tricked if you don't question yourself and others, especially people in a position of authority. He told me that anything that's truly real can stand up to scrutiny." - Sasha Sagan

Believing in Afterlife is not dangerous. What is dangerous is making up things.

I guess things such as afterlife will fall in naturally when you come to the realisation of God's existence.

Just like this world exists - without our permission or approval - so does the hereafter.

It doesn't make sense for there to not be afterlife.
 
Last edited:
Show me.`

"He considered his answer carefully. Finally, he said that there was nothing he would like more in the world than to see his mother and father again, but that he had no reason—and no evidence—to support the idea of an afterlife, so he couldn't give in to the temptation. 'Why?' Then he told me, very tenderly, that it can be dangerous to believe things just because you want them to be true. You can get tricked if you don't question yourself and others, especially people in a position of authority. He told me that anything that's truly real can stand up to scrutiny." - Sasha Sagan

I've not read sagan.

what were his views on extra terrestrial life?

some of his book titles are rather... inspired.


although part of his quote stands true..

try not to get duped by people..

especially people who would like to sell you self help.


ironically both nessy and Bigfoot may have existed at some point in time..
 
Last edited:
No, I am not sure. Neither am I sure that Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster do not exist. Is my lack of certainty sufficient reason to declare that they do in fact exist?

Let's not drag this into the type of discussion that often results in these types of debates/arguments.

You are not sure yet you describe yourself as an atheist, ok fair enough. So what exactly is your reason for being an atheist? And at what age did you become an atheist? I just like to get a better understanding of when people say, "I'm an atheist".
 
:bism: (In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful)

I knew when I came here that I'd be regarded as a possible convert. It's one of the hazards of being curious about the world in which I live, although proselytizing is largely a religious hazard.
To be fair, I think perhaps there would be somewhat an interest in "deconversion" if anyone were to venture into parts of the atheist boards as well. We, to varying degrees, all like who we (think) we are or otherwise we'd stop being that or at least definitely try our best to stop though of course I note some might give into their apathy to even try. That said, curiosity is a good thing, I'd say. If it didn't exist, we wouldn't have the inventions or advancements in science or wing of imaginations having birthed the literature we do. Curiosity really enables us to investigate and sometimes we come out of our comfortable spaces to find ourselves walking onto non-normative pathways. So, that's fantastic. Of course, if I wasn't curious and if I hadn't investigated, I wouldn't identify myself as a Muslim today; so, of course, I have my reasons for saying the good things about curiosity I've said. Yet I also note that certain types of curiosity should best be left to certain types of people with which to tinker such as in the case of a murder investigation for police to deal with or a doctor in the case of diagnosing diseases. Experts are experts for a reason, after all.

So I came here seeking information and with certain expectations. One of these expectations is that as long as I obey the laws of hospitality, then so will my hosts. All this means is that good manners will prevail and that respect will be answered with respect.
I think that's a good and fair expectation; as I'm sure you know though, the Internet is not known for being generally a place in which we can entertain those expectations as it's not known for meeting those expectations sadly enough most times. It seems to bring out the worst in many people as anonymity works in the same way intoxicants and opiates on some people.

I do not recall anyone here accusing me of either bad manners or a lack of respect. It follows, then, that I have behaved myself reasonably well. What does not follow is that I would or should be receptive to or deserve a so-called "bad cop" argumentation. I do not in fact find such a presentation at all persuasive, for several reasons. And, to be sure, neither do I pay much attention to friendship in the pursuit of information.
:)

To restate the obvious, I am an atheist. For me, personally, this means that religious belief is opinion unsupported by evidence. However, I am also a skeptic; this means that I strive to be evidence-driven, and consequently that I am open to being shown that I am wrong. If an enemy has the facts, I will adopt his position; if a friend does not have the facts, I will disagree.
That's actually a fantastic perspective to have and a fair one too. I should hate to think that in the pursuit of friendship someone leaves off disagreeing with me for fear of hurting my feelings; to be sure, disagreements are often undesirable, but sometimes they are necessary in the pursuit of truth and knowledge.

To show me that I'm wrong is quite simple, but may not be easy. Show me. If you want to convert me, show me your god. Give me facts and evidence that cannot be accounted for by any other explanation than your god.
I can show you evidence that account for God, but the investigation is an onus that rests on you; I can point you in the right direction, but I cannot actually do the investigation for you as the entire point is then negated. Sort of like an individual doing the homework for someone else and completely ruining any possibility of real learning having taken place in that someone; that's not helping the someone else even though it may appear helpful.

NOTE: Above, I said *your* god. Remember, from my viewpoint, I'm in a large religious shopping center where deities are a dime a dozen, and I'm deciding whether and which one to buy into. Humanity has worshiped thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of gods throughout history, and some of the oldest are still being worshipped. You have two jobs: convince me that God exists, and convince me that your god is God. Both tasks will require evidence, not interpretation; you supply the evidence and I will interpret it.
I note that most people actually come to believe in Islam through reading the Quran. Did I? No. But that's not important. I think you should read the Quran more so from the point of being curious than anything else as...let's face it that we're all living in a time wherein Muslims and Islam is so much on the news that one rarely stumbles across news in the media that is not discussing one or the other or both.

I actually dislike reading most Old English translations because I find them hard to get through; there's a Quran translation that I've been told is good which I haven't myself used but maybe it might be better for you to use due to its touted simplicity and therefore it is to that translation to which I'm linking you; in the beginning, it gives a background which lasts to about 23 pages with the actual Quran starting at page 26.

If after reading that you have questions or concerns or still don't believe, then I'll see if I can further point you in the right direction and even discuss with you further some evidences that I personally found convincing. But I don't want to start with that because I don't think you're a clone of me and I also don't want to treat you as one. Instead, if you will, I like to think of it all as a complicated kitchen cookbook recipe; we have to have the ingredients, but really, we also have to keep tinkering with it so we can get it to click just "right." I don't know what you'll find personally convincing; I just note that it's different for everybody. I notice though that many times you have to fail before you attain success.

I don't think I'm being unreasonable. If you are right, I have an immortal soul whose eternal fate is in jeopardy. If you are right, following the wrong god is no different than following no god. It therefore seems reasonable to take the utmost care in committing the fate of my eternal soul to the care of any particular god. Prove to me that yours is that god.
Yes, you do have an immortal soul; however, it seems to me that the approach that many people take is so fantastically idiotic that I can't believe it still exists.

Let me say as an atheist I'd had theist friends who would talk to me sometimes about eternal damnation and hell. How well do you think I'd received their words? Since I didn't at that time believe in God, to me it seemed that they were saying that they thought I was worthy of damnation and hell and they were because of some inward piety seeing themselves as somehow better and me as worse. Can't say it did for me anything except to turn me off and make me believe that some people are outwardly religious but inwardly sadistic.

So, frankly, I'm going to follow the golden rule summarized with the words of Prophet Muhammad :saws: (peace and blessings be upon him), “Do unto all men as you would wish to have done unto you; and reject for others what you would reject for yourselves.”

I'm going to tell you is that there is an ayah (verse) in the Quran (2:286) that says, "God does not impose on any soul a responsibility beyond its ability."

What that should tell you and tells me is that if it truly is beyond your ability, then God cannot judge you; but my question to you not for answering in this forum but within yourself is whether it truly is beyond your ability and what could convince you and whether you even want to find out because this is directly tied to justice and mercy of divine judgment.

I've been asking these questions for some time, and not just of various religious folk. I've also addressed them to the cosmos at large, and I'm still waiting for an answer. Perhaps someone should remind God that no answer is an answer.

If you've asked God for an answer, then ask also God to grant you the wisdom and intelligence to understand what the answer is and to accept with serenity that answer when you're presented with that answer. Life is a journey, you know, and not a destination. Maybe the answer was/is delayed and you've been interpreting it as no answer. Maybe also you did receive an answer and you just didn't "see" it.

This humorous story illustrates at the least the foolishness of man when it comes to "seeing" answers from God: :statisfie

A man was once caught in rising floodwaters.

He climbed onto the roof of his house and asked God to rescue him. A neighbor came by in a canoe and said, “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll paddle to safety.”

“No thanks” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

A short time later, the police came by in a boat. “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll take you to safety.”

“No thanks,” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

A little time later, a rescue services helicopter hovered overhead, let down a rope ladder and said:

“The waters will soon be above your house. Climb the ladder and we’ll fly you to safety.”

“No thanks,” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

All this time the floodwaters continued to rise, until soon they reached above the roof and the man drowned. When he arrived at heaven, he demanded an audience with God.

Ushered near God’s throne he said, “Lord, why am I here in Heaven? I prayed for you to answer me and save me from the flood. You never answered me.”

“Yes, you did pray,” replied God. “And I answered you by sending you a canoe, a boat and a helicopter. But you never got in.”

Best Wishes, jabeady, :statisfie

P.S. I know you identify yourself as old but in my book you're young as you feel and youth is never a requirement to be curious and follow curiosity for curiosity's sake.
 
Believing in Afterlife is not dangerous. What is dangerous is making up things.

I guess things such as afterlife will fall in naturally when you come to the realisation of God's existence.

Just like this world exists - without our permission or approval - so does the hereafter.

It doesn't make sense for there to not be afterlife.

What does "sense" have to do with it? Human senses are fallible. As a Muslim, don't you trust in Allah, *especially* when things don't appear to make sense? For that matter, it's quite possible for an atheist, but not a skeptic, to believe in an afterlife. There's no verifiable evidence for an afterlife, so a skeptic would reserve judgment, same as with gods.
 
:bism: (In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful)


To be fair, I think perhaps there would be somewhat an interest in "deconversion" if anyone were to venture into parts of the atheist boards as well. We, to varying degrees, all like who we (think) we are or otherwise we'd stop being that or at least definitely try our best to stop though of course I note some might give into their apathy to even try. That said, curiosity is a good thing, I'd say. If it didn't exist, we wouldn't have the inventions or advancements in science or wing of imaginations having birthed the literature we do. Curiosity really enables us to investigate and sometimes we come out of our comfortable spaces to find ourselves walking onto non-normative pathways. So, that's fantastic. Of course, if I wasn't curious and if I hadn't investigated, I wouldn't identify myself as a Muslim today; so, of course, I have my reasons for saying the good things about curiosity I've said. Yet I also note that certain types of curiosity should best be left to certain types of people with which to tinker such as in the case of a murder investigation for police to deal with or a doctor in the case of diagnosing diseases. Experts are experts for a reason, after all.


I think that's a good and fair expectation; as I'm sure you know though, the Internet is not known for being generally a place in which we can entertain those expectations as it's not known for meeting those expectations sadly enough most times. It seems to bring out the worst in many people as anonymity works in the same way intoxicants and opiates on some people.


:)


That's actually a fantastic perspective to have and a fair one too. I should hate to think that in the pursuit of friendship someone leaves off disagreeing with me for fear of hurting my feelings; to be sure, disagreements are often undesirable, but sometimes they are necessary in the pursuit of truth and knowledge.


I can show you evidence that account for God, but the investigation is an onus that rests on you; I can point you in the right direction, but I cannot actually do the investigation for you as the entire point is then negated. Sort of like an individual doing the homework for someone else and completely ruining any possibility of real learning having taken place in that someone; that's not helping the someone else even though it may appear helpful.


I note that most people actually come to believe in Islam through reading the Quran. Did I? No. But that's not important. I think you should read the Quran more so from the point of being curious than anything else as...let's face it that we're all living in a time wherein Muslims and Islam is so much on the news that one rarely stumbles across news in the media that is not discussing one or the other or both.

I actually dislike reading most Old English translations because I find them hard to get through; there's a Quran translation that I've been told is good which I haven't myself used but maybe it might be better for you to use due to its touted simplicity and therefore it is to that translation to which I'm linking you; in the beginning, it gives a background which lasts to about 23 pages with the actual Quran starting at page 26.

If after reading that you have questions or concerns or still don't believe, then I'll see if I can further point you in the right direction and even discuss with you further some evidences that I personally found convincing. But I don't want to start with that because I don't think you're a clone of me and I also don't want to treat you as one. Instead, if you will, I like to think of it all as a complicated kitchen cookbook recipe; we have to have the ingredients, but really, we also have to keep tinkering with it so we can get it to click just "right." I don't know what you'll find personally convincing; I just note that it's different for everybody. I notice though that many times you have to fail before you attain success.


Yes, you do have an immortal soul; however, it seems to me that the approach that many people take is so fantastically idiotic that I can't believe it still exists.

Let me say as an atheist I'd had theist friends who would talk to me sometimes about eternal damnation and hell. How well do you think I'd received their words? Since I didn't at that time believe in God, to me it seemed that they were saying that they thought I was worthy of damnation and hell and they were because of some inward piety seeing themselves as somehow better and me as worse. Can't say it did for me anything except to turn me off and make me believe that some people are outwardly religious but inwardly sadistic.

So, frankly, I'm going to follow the golden rule summarized with the words of Prophet Muhammad :saws: (peace and blessings be upon him), “Do unto all men as you would wish to have done unto you; and reject for others what you would reject for yourselves.”

I'm going to tell you is that there is an ayah (verse) in the Quran (2:286) that says, "God does not impose on any soul a responsibility beyond its ability."

What that should tell you and tells me is that if it truly is beyond your ability, then God cannot judge you; but my question to you not for answering in this forum but within yourself is whether it truly is beyond your ability and what could convince you and whether you even want to find out because this is directly tied to justice and mercy of divine judgment.



If you've asked God for an answer, then ask also God to grant you the wisdom and intelligence to understand what the answer is and to accept with serenity that answer when you're presented with that answer. Life is a journey, you know, and not a destination. Maybe the answer was/is delayed and you've been interpreting it as no answer. Maybe also you did receive an answer and you just didn't "see" it.

This humorous story illustrates at the least the foolishness of man when it comes to "seeing" answers from God: :statisfie

A man was once caught in rising floodwaters.

He climbed onto the roof of his house and asked God to rescue him. A neighbor came by in a canoe and said, “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll paddle to safety.”

“No thanks” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

A short time later, the police came by in a boat. “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll take you to safety.”

“No thanks,” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

A little time later, a rescue services helicopter hovered overhead, let down a rope ladder and said:

“The waters will soon be above your house. Climb the ladder and we’ll fly you to safety.”

“No thanks,” replied the man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure God will save me.”

All this time the floodwaters continued to rise, until soon they reached above the roof and the man drowned. When he arrived at heaven, he demanded an audience with God.

Ushered near God’s throne he said, “Lord, why am I here in Heaven? I prayed for you to answer me and save me from the flood. You never answered me.”

“Yes, you did pray,” replied God. “And I answered you by sending you a canoe, a boat and a helicopter. But you never got in.”

Best Wishes, jabeady, :statisfie

P.S. I know you identify yourself as old but in my book you're young as you feel and youth is never a requirement to be curious and follow curiosity for curiosity's sake.

I like the story.. because the guy got into heaven.

also living on signs mode would just drive you crazy..

imma buy a truck.. n paint "signs" on the side of it..

because I'm not good with conversation.


you want to be a freemason? because that's how you bees a freemason?

...probably.


best-food-fights-film.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've not read sagan.

what were his views on extra terrestrial life?

some of his book titles are rather... inspired.

Generally, that the universe is a really big place, and that the odds favor it. OTOH, the universe is so big that the odds do not favor contact, given known technology.
 
I've not read sagan.

what were his views on extra terrestrial life?

some of his book titles are rather... inspired.


although part of his quote stands true..

try not to get duped by people..

especially people who would like to sell you self help.


ironically both nessy and Bigfoot may have existed at some point in time..

Oh, read Sagan. His books are excellent! And although many would disagree with me, watch the movie Contact. It's LOOSELY based on one of his books. I liked the movie better. Jodie Foster and Matthew McConaughey. Good stuff.
 
Generally, that the universe is a really big place, and that the odds favor it. OTOH, the universe is so big that the odds do not favor contact, given known technology.

Why do you try teaching others science.

And when I teach you of science.

You get all mad and stuff.
 
Oh, read Sagan. His books are excellent! And although many would disagree with me, watch the movie Contact. It's LOOSELY based on one of his books. I liked the movie better. Jodie Foster and Matthew McConaughey. Good stuff.

I've seen contact a long time ago..

although as luck would have it i can't remember the ending ending.

it's been a while since I've read books..

Maybe i need a break from the Internet.
 
My point is, Atheists think Atheism is way bigger than it truly is.

This reminds me of when Ahmadinejad said there are no homosexuals in Iran. Do you really trust the surveys?

In reality, Atheists tend to be less influential than us.

And? What is your point? Do you see this as a point of pride or is there some deeper meaning you are getting at here?

fhmn63 said:
Do You Know that Even Scientists do not Believe in Aethism

There are some scientists who believe in Gods, this is true. It is also true that the atheistic ratio is much higher in scientists than in the general public. But why does that matter?
 
Last edited:

Similar Threads

Back
Top