Lynx
IB Veteran
- Messages
- 556
- Reaction score
- 29
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Agnosticism
I can also say this exact same thing about atheists:
I feel that ultimately what atheistic people ask me requires too many assumptions about the natural world; too much about the world is just taken for granted in their minds, because they simply take it as a given out of their philosophy books.
(I almost said "science books", but I retracted because I remember that science books does not and can never explain about the origin of life and the cause of everything, so there).
I think you should change that back to 'science books'. There are a plethora of ideas on the subject of abiogenesis (and even experiments) as well as theories and ideas in cosmology and theoretical physics attempting to explain why the big bang happened. I think philosophy has very little to do with this. So contrary to your opinion, science does frequently attempt to explain the origins of life and the universe; whether you consider this a fruitful endeavour is your opinion, but I'd trust the human brain, even if we are mere mortals
