Berries’forest said:Well there are some on this board who claim to be non materialists and atheists at the same time.
Well, if you’re talking about any of the conversations where I was present then what they meant by “not all atheists are materialists” was “they’re not all physicalists”. As in “not all of them believe that only the physical world exists”. In which case I still say that I’ll believe it when I see it. There may be a few odd cases here and there but I don’t know if I can think of any off the top of my head. Even Buddhists believe in devas.
ZJK24 said:They usually write things like 'You like believing in an imaginary guy in the sky, believe in the tooth fairy as well?' It's this kind of thing the atheists write that shows a shameful ignorance of what God means in the life of a lot of people. Comparing God to the tooth fairy and flying teapots. Is this what helps them sleep at night??
They’ll tell you that they’re really trying to prove some purely non-judgmental intellectual point. They’re deceiving themselves. But what do intentions even matter when it comes to something like this? It’s an endlessly repeating pattern throughout history. How many times does The Qur’an say, “And when our signs are shown to the unbelievers, he says, ‘Fairy tales of the ancients!'”
And I strongly agree with the charity part also, although the atheists usually say they do charity I always only see religious institutions reacting to crisis and disasters both in their own country and abroad. I never see atheists raising support and awareness for the Palestinians for example although i have seen some non-Muslims like Christians and even Hindus doing it.
One statistic I’ve come across says that atheists are more charitable or something one-on-one, but another one says that on a larger scale those areas which are more strongly religious tend to be more giving on the whole in terms of the community. I don’t know what the whole truth is and personally I make it a rule never to fully trust any surveys conducted on a topic related to religion or politics. Think about it: for what possible reason would someone without an agenda do a study like that? A genuine reason, I mean, and not prattle and waffle like “general advancement of knowledge of the human psyche on the subject of yada yada”?
Last edited: