World Muslim-Sikh Federation Launches Campaign

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rule one: No personal insults


Rule two: No personal insults


Rule Three: No personal insults


Rule Four: No personal insults


Rule Five: See rule one

Well, if you think of the nature of the thread, Afdal seems to be the one who's attacking the Sikhs, and calling us donkeys and hindus. Is that acceptable? Not to me it Isn't.
 
Well, if you think of the nature of the thread, Afdal seems to be the one who's attacking the Sikhs, and calling us donkeys and hindus. Is that acceptable? Not to me it Isn't.


No, it is not acceptable to say anything, without verifiable references to show as evidence. To post derogatory comments without verification, is considered bashing.

With that said I would like to ask Bro.Afdal to provide verifiable sources for his comments. If they can be verified as true I will allow them to stay. If they can not be verified I will do what ever is best in my opinion.
 
No, it is not acceptable to say anything, without verifiable references to show as evidence. To post derogatory comments without verification, is considered bashing.

Now, I do wonder what verifiable references he can provide to illustrate Sikhs are donkeys, or even Hindus...:mmokay:
 
Please study sikhism and hinduism and you will find that ther are alot of diffrence.

Thankyou brother. A bit of education can go a long way.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ke Fateh (Pure Ones Belong To God, Victory To God)
 
Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Sikh guru, he said: "He himself acknowledged Hum Hindu Hain"

Ranjit Singh's rule (1799-1839). All this while, so runs the argument, the Sikh religious and cultural heritage ran parallel to, not always antagonistic with, Hinduism.


Guru Nanak (1469-1539) had rejected the authority of the Brahmans, spurned ritualism and repudiated idol worship.

It denies the fact that if the Sikh communities had demonised the Muslims or the Congress in the past


http://www.hinduonnet.com/2003/03/04/stories/2003030400951000.htm


I think the Sikhs can find some point on this.

Sikhs wanted to come out of the Brahmin fold of Idol worship and with the time of historical consequences - Sikhs wanted to be seperated from the Hindus and should be named as Sikhs as seperate religion and not as hindu branch of religion.

The sikhs system can be compared with the Sankaradevs system which is prevelent in Assam , N.E. West bengal - if one looks than also they are against brahmin's idol worshping and they till now do not worship idols, but the sankaris also considered themselved as seperate than hindus but who know them, they are considered as hindus and not as sankaris.
 
WOW what a great source you've brought. A hindu site LOL - I actually feel sorry for your stupidty. I trully do!
 
Thankyou brother. A bit of education can go a long way.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ke Fateh (Pure Ones Belong To God, Victory To God)


Have you ever read of Sikh Holy Book, Guru Granth Sahib, it still is full of devotional verses addresses to Hindu gods like Rama, Shiva, Maa Kali etc. some people might want it to be a different religion or a monoatheist religion, but the truth is Sikhs and Hindus are one and would stay as they are for a long time to come. Fanatic Sikh priests might have overtaken Harmandir Sahib, painted over the frescos of Hindu gods, thrown out the statues of Hindu gods, but this is the truth I do not see any difference or contardiction between Hindus or Sikhs.
 
Punjabi Hindus hold Sikhism in high regard, many Punjabi Hindus not only in India but worldwide today visit their local Gurudwaras regularly and adhere to the preaching’s of the Guru Granth Sahib. Sikhism is traditionally seen as a religion of warriors who were protectors of Hindus against marauding Islamic invaders who sought to convert Hindus to Islam by lethal force.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_Rajputs
 
Yes, but the Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji consists of the word Allah, Ram, Rahim, so that would make us Muslms to? (As some Muslims say) Apparently Dhan Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a Muslim, because he went to Makka. We don't believe he is Muslim, because he's instructed to begin a new religion by Allah. (Which he did)

Dhan Guru Tegh Bahadar Ji, was martyed, because he did no give up his Sikh religion, and he defended the Hindus from forceful conversion. Guru Ji said he would have done the SAME had the Muslims been persecuted by the Hindus.

THIS MY DEAR BOY IS SIKHISM!! SACRAFICE YOURSELF FOR FREEDOM OF OTHERS TO LIVE AND PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION!
 
Last edited:
Punjabi Hindus hold Sikhism in high regard, many Punjabi Hindus not only in India but worldwide today visit their local Gurudwaras regularly and adhere to the preaching’s of the Guru Granth Sahib. Sikhism is traditionally seen as a religion of warriors who were protectors of Hindus against marauding Islamic invaders who sought to convert Hindus to Islam by lethal force.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_Rajputs

Sikhism appeals to the whole world! - Buddhists go to the Darbar Sahib in india. They regard Dhan Guru Nanak Dev Ji Mahraaj as 'Nanak Lama' Muslims Respect Dhan Guru Nanak Dev Ji, Akbar the Great revered Guru Nanak Sahib Ji. I can go on and on, meas nothing.
 
Yes, but the Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji consists of the word Allah, Ram, Rahim, so that would make us Muslms to? (As some Muslims say) Apparently Dhan Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a Muslim, because he went to Makka. We don't believe he is Muslim, because he's instructed to begin a new religion by Allah. (Which he did)

Dhan Guru Tegh Bahadar Ji, was martyed, because he did no give up his Sikh religion, and he defended the Hindus from forceful conversion. Guru Ji said he would have done the SAME had the Muslims been persecuted by the Hindus.

THIS MY DEAR BOY IS SIKHISM!! SACRAFICE YOURSELF FOR FREEDOM OF OTHERS TO LIVE AND PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION!


You are contradicting yourself. Tegh Bahadur would have done the same - had the Muslim being persecuted by the hindus, but but but ?????????
 
Man, you're faling n your mission. You're supposed to show that SIKHS ARE HINDUS. not show how Sikhs are proving Hindus are distorting Sikhism to prove we are the same. Sikhs are not the same because Hindu fanatics concoct things up.

Are you a Christian? Are you a Hindu? Because before Muslims, only Jews, Hindus and Christians existed Explain it to me?

BTW Dr Zakir Naik, in his video proves Islam has more in common wh Hinduism than ANY other religion!

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
 
Last edited:
No, it is not acceptable to say anything, without verifiable references to show as evidence. To post derogatory comments without verification, is considered bashing.

With that said I would like to ask Bro.Afdal to provide verifiable sources for his comments. If they can be verified as true I will allow them to stay. If they can not be verified I will do what ever is best in my opinion.


Now, I do wonder what verifiable references he can provide to illustrate Sikhs are donkeys, or even Hindus...



Like these I can give you tonnes of information that Sikhs are Hindus and not antagonist.
 
You are contradicting yourself. Guru Tegh Bahadur Jiwould have done the same - had the Muslim being persecuted by the hindus, but but but ?????????

I can see you're an over excited teen...

'But But But?????' 'Muslim' Moguls were doing the forced conversions, or do you have information to show it was others?
 
Man, you're faling n your mission. Yo're supposed to show that SIKHS ARE HINDUS. not show how Sikhs are proving Hindus are distorting Sikhism to prove we are the same. Sikhs are not the same because Hindu fanatics concoct thing sup.

Are you a Christian? Are you a Hindu? Because before Muslims, only Jews, Hindus and Christians existed Explain it to me?

BTW Dr Zakir Naik, in his video proves Islam hasmore in common wh Hinduism than ANY other religion!

Put that in yur pipe and smoke it!



I am a Muslim and I believe in " La Illaha Ilalahu Muhamadur Rasul Allah.

Look upon in the Zakir Naik video - what he wants to explain . If you would have understand than you would not have shouted as Sikhs are different than Hindus - either you would have accepted Islam.
 
I can see you're an over excited teen...

'But But But?????' 'Muslim' Moguls were doing the forced conversions, or do you have information to show it was others?


As I have said you before - that Sikhs have being made to save Hindus - you have proved it by your coments.


Muslims in India did not did force conversion, eitherwise Indian subcontinent would have being free from these Idol worshipers.
 
LOL! Man what a cretin!

Here I too can play this game 'Muhammad Predicted in Hindu Scriptures' This means all you Muslims are Hindus, and should convert!

I have more...
 
As I have said you before - that Sikhs have being made to save Hindus - you have proved it by your coments.


Muslims in India did not did force conversion, eitherwise Indian subcontinent would have being free from these Idol worshipers.

So in your warped mind, if the Hindus were killing Muslims, and Dhan Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji gave his head instead of allowing the conversion of muslims to Hindus, what would that make us? Muslims because Guru Ji gave his head? Use your loaf man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top