Since Iran became media attention around the world. Its not proof Iran is developing Nuclear arms in my opinion, but its proof the president of Iran being more aggressive on his defense. What is your opinion on nuclear arms in the world? Does Iran want more power in the middle east getting nuclear? Do you think there will be war on Iran? or Just war of words and power......
I tell you one thing, Iran is no joke. Afghanistan and iraq obviously america is losing if you keep your data with the war. And your talking about Iran? My friend Iran is a country i tell you right now to start with them theyre the last people. They have very very strong Mujhadeen
I tell you one thing, Iran is no joke. Afghanistan and iraq obviously america is losing if you keep your data with the war. And your talking about Iran? My friend Iran is a country i tell you right now to start with them theyre the last people. They have very very strong Mujhadeen
LOL, the US is losing in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Maybe in the eyes of the media, but not on the ground. Far from it.
Anyways, an invasion of Iran is not an option, but the US does not have to invade Iran to bring it to its knees. A few weeks of carpet bombing would do the trick.
Syria is next because the US nation has to serve its masters the Isrealis and to help then form the Greater Isreal.and Syria definately stands in the way
salam
the two holy cities of saudi arabia, makkah and madinah, are so heavily protected that no-one can imagine how to, allah forbid, destroy the cities. as allah says that His House will be protected and the city and the prophet SAW mosque will too be protected. no-one not even the kuffars of USA can touch or imagine to destroy the holy city of makkah and madinah. no one has more power than allah.
and by the end of the century, islam will grow to such a large number, people are gonna wish why didn't they revert before.
its obvious Faust that you hate islam and muslims
wasalam
Last edited by MetSudaisTwice; 01-20-2006 at 12:28 PM.
From his intro page this Faust guy seemed like someone good and now he writes all this stuff
I dont get it, is it the same person? :confused:
But on topic, maybe iran is the next target coz remember what happened in iraq, they blamed them of having weapons of mass destruction and now in iran they are blaming them for the nuclear stuff.
All we can do is pray for the muslims, I.A. :sister:
If the Saudi cult never invited American soldiers to Iraq in 1991 none of this ever would have happened. No 9/11, No Gulf war, No Afghanistan, Nothing. Blame them for the crimes against the ummah nobody else.
The Americans are just barbarian herds they will graze wherever they are allowed to.
You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake
You are the same decaying organic matter as everything else
We are all part of the same compost heap
We are the all singing, all dancing, **** of the world
Imad i want to know whats your political statues in knowing whats going in Afghanistan and Iraq? I have first hand experience and knowledge of whats reall y going on. If you think you know your politics, you should really understand what you say and whats really going on
First of all, Iraq the US will pullout and once they do the Mujahadeen of Iraq will take it all Again similiar to Vietnam
Afghanistan, if you think karzai govt is strong? My friend he owns kabul not Afghanistan, the taliban are just waiting
Trust me you think you know whats really going on? you have no clue
The min the US leaves Iraq you will see what happens
I dont think the US has enough personnel to initiate a war against iran, and the iranians know that. The Iraq war is pretty unpopular, so I doubt if Bush will go for it
Assalamu'alaikum
My dad was doing some reading up on this, and he says that what the sources are saying is that the U.S. is planning to attack Iran this March Wallahu a'lam. Boy, I just can't wait till the U.S. is brought down and humiliated one day,....but dont know when?
Assalamu'alaikum
My dad was doing some reading up on this, and he says that what the sources are saying is that the U.S. is planning to attack Iran this March Wallahu a'lam. Boy, I just can't wait till the U.S. is brought down and humiliated one day,....but dont know when?
Maybe when people stop whining and actually did something?
You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake
You are the same decaying organic matter as everything else
We are all part of the same compost heap
We are the all singing, all dancing, **** of the world
Maybe in the eyes of the media, but not on the ground. Far from it.
Anyways, an invasion of Iran is not an option, but the US does not have to invade Iran to bring it to its knees. A few weeks of carpet bombing would do the trick.
now its the medias fualt? ur getting into conspiricy theories now, i thought bush supporters detest them? ur own generals said the war in iraq is unwinable militraly and i watched em say it on PBS and ABC.. google it
US militrey cant even control and have security in bagdad(even in green zone) much the less the sunni Part of iraq, wat kinda winning is that? in afganistan they atleast have control of kabul somewhat but that because the mujahdeens focus are on iraq now..
its a matter of time and persistance , but it will take more lives unfortunatly
Former Bush aide who urged caution over Iraq signals start of withdrawal by end of 2006
Ned Temko
Sunday January 22, 2006
The Observer
Colin Powell, who warned President Bush on the eve of the Iraq war that US forces would have to stay for the long haul after toppling Saddam, yesterday predicted that troop withdrawals would begin by the end of this year.
He spoke as final results of the elections for a new Iraqi government left the Shia Muslim alliance 10 seats short of an outright parliamentary majority - boosting US and British hopes of a coalition including Sunni and Kurdish groups. Britain's ambassador to Iraq, William Patey, said after the results were announced that an 'inclusive government of national unity' would help chances of a 'significant' withdrawal of the UK's 8,000 troops.
Powell, the former Secretary of State, told The Observer that, while the 'characteristics of the new government' would be clearer in the weeks ahead, the US role was to 'make sure the process [of transition] unfolds successfully'.
During his policy battles with Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon hawks in the run-up to the Iraq war, Powell at one point reportedly cautioned Bush: 'If you break it, you own it.' Since stepping down as the administration's senior diplomat after the 2004 presidential election, he has reiterated his view that America must not cut and run.
But asked whether his 'break-it-and-own it' remark implied staying for as long as it takes to get a fully functioning and stable Iraq, Powell replied: 'No. It means fixing it to the point where we can give ownership back,' - a process which he suggested had taken a major step forward with the election of the new Iraqi government.
'We did break that [Saddam] government and I'm glad we broke it,' he said. 'It was a rotten government and something that should be broken. But we then immediately assumed ownership - and we've been working hard for the past two-plus years to return that ownership.'
Powell, who also served as America's military chief-of-staff, said the specific numbers and pace of US troop pull-outs would be decided by 'my junior officers', generals whom he said he had trained as lieutenants. But he said: 'I think we'll probably see some drawdown in numbers in 2006.
'I hope we'll see a reduction in forces as the Iraqi forces become more competent and the Iraqi political system begins to take hold,' he added.
His remarks came amid growing pressure on Bush's administration over Iraq, where 160,000 US troops form by far the largest share of the international military force and where more than 2,000 American soldiers have been killed.
Recent media reports have suggested the Pentagon has plans in place to begin to reduce the number of US troops, but Bush has emphasised that he remains committed to ensuring that a democratic government in Baghdad and Iraq's own security forces can exert control before any full-scale pull-out.
Powell was speaking after a visit to Britain last week to address a series of fundraising dinners for the JNF, a British Jewish charity. In remarks during his visit, he said that in retrospect he felt the Americans should have committed more troops to the Iraqi invasion and ensured that law, order and a functioning government were in place when Saddam's regime collapsed. In an interview with the Jewish Chronicle, he added that 'when the insurgency started, we didn't act quickly enough to try to stop it'. But, he added, 'that's all history... the more important issue is what we do now'.
Speaking to The Observer, Powell was generally upbeat about the prosects for early progress in the move to hand over ownership to the Iraqis.
He also said that while military force to prevent neighbouring Iran getting nuclear arms remained 'an option', he was confident the Iranians remained some distance from getting a nuclear weapon. The emphasis now, he said, was on intense diplomacy by the international community on the Iranians.
I was right the u.s is preparing war with Iran.....There is alot of rumors becoming true.
Easy with the self-congratulations. They have contingency plans for Iran, just like they have for any other "hot spot" with potential to wreak havoc. Seeing as though Russia and China would be losing too much money if they back emphatic attempts at "curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions", the USA is doing only what is sensible(at maintaining their interests): devising their own plans of "diplomatic alternatives" heh should they be needed.
Easy with the self-congratulations. They have contingency plans for Iran, just like they have for any other "hot spot" with potential to wreak havoc. Seeing as though Russia and China would be losing too much money if they back emphatic attempts at "curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions", the USA is doing only what is sensible(at maintaining their interests): devising their own plans of "diplomatic alternatives" heh should they be needed.
It would be stupid not to have contigencies for all of them. We got invasionplans for Britian, Austrailia, Canada, France, Germany and so on. Look up War Plan Orange, Black, Red, and so on.
there is no signs that show that syria is the next target as much as it is showing that Iran is.
however the campaign is much more dangerous than what it seems
bombing nuclear facilities is not a matter of just one bomb...its a series of bombing.
with the bombing of nuclear facilities it is also important to watch out for nuclear radiation leaks...not safe for the people and will spark an international opinion as well as an enraged Iranian government.
Bombimg Iran would definately mean a new war in the region with so many countries invloved, and definately Israel will have something to do with it.
the bombers will most likely operate from Israel and NOT Iraq.
there is 19 nuclear facilities in Iran most of which are well defensed and some that are underground, bombing these facilites will take at least a week.
Russia and China invested Billions in Iran nuclear campaign and will not tolerate the interference of the US against the benefits they can claim from Iran.
not that Russia and China are both members of the nuclear watch board.
Syria is not the main concern now, and Syria regime will forfeit on its own with international pressure and an internal uprising.
there is no signs that show that syria is the next target as much as it is showing that Iran is.
however the campaign is much more dangerous than what it seems
bombing nuclear facilities is not a matter of just one bomb...its a series of bombing.
with the bombing of nuclear facilities it is also important to watch out for nuclear radiation leaks...not safe for the people and will spark an international opinion as well as an enraged Iranian government.
Bombimg Iran would definately mean a new war in the region with so many countries invloved, and definately Israel will have something to do with it.
the bombers will most likely operate from Israel and NOT Iraq.
there is 19 nuclear facilities in Iran most of which are well defensed and some that are underground, bombing these facilites will take at least a week.
Russia and China invested Billions in Iran nuclear campaign and will not tolerate the interference of the US against the benefits they can claim from Iran.
not that Russia and China are both members of the nuclear watch board.
Syria is not the main concern now, and Syria regime will forfeit on its own with international pressure and an internal uprising.
You don't have to hit the nuclear sites. You destroy infrastructure. You hit power grides. You can't run a reactor with no electricity. You hit oil refineries. You hit supply depots. There 's ways of stopping Iran.
I just want to cry when I think of all the innocent people that could die as a result of all this..... not just in the middle east.
Iran are allowed by law to have nuclear power, if not, what are they supposed to do when fossil fuels run out?
Hmmm... I wonder.. no doubt be buyig some form of new power source from the states!!
Sorry, call me synical, but lets be honest, this whole thign is about money and power, even more of it for even greedier people.
I wish the whitehouse / downing street would stop listening to big business... I wish we all would.
I kinda feel that attacking Iran will be just about the final straw for most westerners... I refuse to vote since the Iraqi invasion, purely because I do not see what the point is as the governements are all corrupt.
The devil has got his hand in this whole affair, but Muslim or Christian or whatever, we all know that that sneaking snidy snake will get whats coming to him at end of days.
Seems to me that the weight of God's will is the thing that will beat this, I just pray that if it is His will, He does.
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
in afganistan they atleast have control of kabul somewhat but that because the mujahdeens focus are on iraq now..
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks