× Register Login What's New! Contact us
Page 4 of 4 First ... 2 3 4
Results 61 to 68 of 68 visibility 10557

They're gonna invade Mali...

  1. #1
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    Full Member Array Jedi_Mindset's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Holland
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    1,345
    Threads
    67
    Reputation
    5573
    Rep Power
    83
    Rep Ratio
    42
    Likes Ratio
    66

    They're gonna invade Mali... (OP)


    ''UN authorizes military intervention in Mali

    The UN Security Council has unanimously approved an African-led military force to intervene in Mali to combat hardline Islamists, terrorists and armed gangs ruling the northern part of the country. The international force will be given a one-year mandate which may later be extended. It will be allowed to use “all necessary measures.” The intervention was authorized after regional politicians failed to broker a political solution between the Islamist extremists and Tuareg rebels vying for control of northern Mali. A March 22 coup allowed Islamists, who are imposing Islamic sharia law, to take control of Mali's northern cities.''



    They're gonna invade Mali...

    http://www.youtube.com/user/robinb4life?feature=mhee
    I will not calm down until I will put one cheek of a tyrant on the ground and the other under my feet, and for the poor and weak, I will put my cheek on the ground.
    - Umar ibn khattab(Ra)
    wwwislamicboardcom - They're gonna invade Mali...

  2. #61
    سيف الله's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,971
    Threads
    336
    Rep Power
    98
    Rep Ratio
    16
    Likes Ratio
    15

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    Report bad ads?

    Salaam

    Another update, On the wider implications of this intervention

    The Real Invasion Of Africa Is Not News, And A Licence To Lie Is Hollywood’s Gift

    A full-scale invasion of Africa is under way. The United States is deploying troops in 35 African countries, beginning with Libya, Sudan, Algeria and Niger. Reported by Associated Press on Christmas Day, this was missing from most Anglo-American media.

    The invasion has almost nothing to do with “Islamism”, and almost everything to do with the acquisition of resources, notably minerals, and an accelerating rivalry with China. Unlike China, the US and its allies are prepared to use a degree of violence demonstrated in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Palestine. As in the cold war, a division of labour requires that western journalism and popular culture provide the cover of a holy war against a “menacing arc” of Islamic extremism, no different from the bogus “red menace” of a worldwide communist conspiracy.

    Reminiscent of the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th century, the US African Command (Africom) has built a network of supplicants among collaborative African regimes eager for American bribes and armaments. Last year, Africom staged Operation African Endeavor, with the armed forces of 34 African nations taking part, commanded by the US military.

    Africom’s “soldier to soldier” doctrine embeds US officers at every level of command from general to warrant officer. Only pith helmets are missing.

    It is as if Africa’s proud history of liberation, from Patrice Lumumba to Nelson Mandela, is consigned to oblivion by a new master’s black colonial elite whose “historic mission”, warned Frantz Fanon half a century ago, is the promotion of “a capitalism rampant though camouflaged”.

    A striking example is the eastern Congo, a treasure trove of strategic minerals, controlled by an atrocious rebel group known as the M23, which in turn is run by Uganda and Rwanda, the proxies of Washington.

    Long planned as a “mission” for Nato, not to mention the ever-zealous French, whose colonial lost causes remain on permanent standby, the war on Africa became urgent in 2011 when the Arab world appeared to be liberating itself from the Mubaraks and other clients of Washington and Europe. The hysteria this caused in imperial capitals cannot be exaggerated. Nato bombers were dispatched not to Tunis or Cairo but Libya, where Muammar Gaddafi ruled over Africa’s largest oil reserves. With the Libyan city of Sirte reduced to rubble, the British SAS directed the “rebel” militias in what has since been exposed as a racist bloodbath.

    The indigenous people of the Sahara, the Tuareg, whose Berber fighters Gaddafi had protected, fled home across Algeria to Mali, where the Tuareg have been claiming a separate state since the 1960s. As the ever watchful Patrick Cockburn points out, it is this local dispute, not al-Qaida, that the West fears most in northwest Africa …. “poor though the Tuareg may be, they are often living on top of great reserves of oil, gas, uranium and other valuable minerals”.

    Almost certainly the consequence of a French/US attack on Mali on 13 January, a siege at a gas complex in Algeria ended bloodily, inspiring a 9/11 moment in David Cameron. The former Carlton TV PR man raged about a “global threat” requiring “decades” of western violence. He meant implantation of the west’s business plan for Africa, together with the rape of multi-ethnic Syria and the conquest of independent Iran.

    Cameron has now ordered British troops to Mali, and sent an RAF drone, while his verbose military chief, General Sir David Richards, has addressed “a very clear message to jihadists worldwide: don’t dangle and tangle with us. We will deal with it robustly” – exactly what jihadists want to hear. The trail of blood of British army terror victims, all Muslims, their “systemic” torture cases currently heading to court, add necessary irony to the general’s words. I once experienced Sir David’s “robust” ways when I asked him if he had read the courageous Afghan feminist Malalai Joya’s description of the barbaric behaviour of westerners and their clients in her country. “You are an apologist for the Taliban” was his reply. (He later apologised).

    http://johnpilger.com/articles/the-real-invasion-of-africa-is-not-news-and-a-licence-to-lie-is-hollywoods-gift
    chat Quote

  3. Report bad ads?
  4. #62
    Independent's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Other
    Posts
    1,123
    Threads
    3
    Rep Power
    76
    Rep Ratio
    31
    Likes Ratio
    13

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    format_quote Originally Posted by Junon View Post
    The invasion has almost nothing to do with “Islamism”, and almost everything to do with the acquisition of resources, notably minerals, and an accelerating rivalry with China.
    We already talked about the resource issue earlier in this thread - it just doesn't stack up, the financials don't make sense even if you want to assume the worst about the governments. For instance there is this from the Think Africa Press website:

    'What are France's objectives in intervening in northern Mali? Who exactly are they fighting?

    It is worth beginning by dismissing some theories about France’s motivations for intervening which are erroneous.Firstly, it is not neo-colonialism. While France has a sorry record of neo-colonialism in its former colonies, this intervention is not an example of it. Mali is an outlier in French post-colonialism and French economic interests in Mali are relatively limited.

    Secondly, conspiracy theories about riches under the Sahara are misguided. Northern Mali has no proven oil or uranium deposits, and it is not clear that if any were discovered, France would recoup the costs of the intervention in preferential agreements. It is possible that worries of a spill-over into Niger – from which France imports 7% of its domestic energy supplies in the form of uranium – was a factor in French decision-making. But the intervention has put those assets more not less at risk.

    Thirdly, references to the “strategic importance” of Mali should be quickly dismissed. Mali has little strategic importance to any outside power in terms of economic or other resources. Indeed, prior to the events of the last year, Mali was truly one of the world’s strategic backwaters.

    In that case, what reasons did inform France’s decision? The strategic interest that France sees, whether justified or not, is in removing, or halting the spread of, Islamist militants in the country and region. I am minded to take French strategic thinking pretty much at face value here, although I personally think the threat of Islamic militancy to both the region and outside the region is overblown.

    One false narrative which has been accepted, however, is that the events in northern Mali are blowback from NATO’s 2011 intervention in Libya. This narrative, whilst not without elements of truth, is overstated, overpowering so much other analysis.

    I have two main problems with it. Firstly, it completely ignores local dynamics alongside messy and unclear facts. Instead, it substitutes a kind of theory of cosmic payback for Western foreign policy. This places the effects of Western policy far above the moods and motivations of Malians. Whilst this easy assumption may have worked with respect to the War on Terror in other Muslim majority countries, it fails to properly face facts in Mali.

    Secondly, the theory, at least in its common, most exaggerated form, fails at the basic level of common sense. Niger, which actually borders Libya, unlike Mali, would be a far more likely candidate to suffer blowback from Libya. Fighters in the Libyan war crossed the border between the two. Niger has a large Tuareg population. There is a history of trans-border criminal and Islamic militant networks just like in Mali. And there are actually natural resources there (uranium and oil). However, Niger remains stable whilst Mali is in crisis. A significantly weaker version of blowback theory could explain this, but the usual blithe assumptions around the necessary link between Mali and Libya cannot.'

    http://thinkafricapress.com/mali/editors-q-whats-deal-mali


    On a lighter note, congratulations to Mali for reaching the semi finals of the African Football Cup of Nations, despite everything that has happened back home.

    Last edited by Independent; 02-05-2013 at 05:30 PM.
    | Likes KAding, Roasted Cashew liked this post
    chat Quote

  5. #63
    Jedi_Mindset's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Holland
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    1,345
    Threads
    67
    Rep Power
    83
    Rep Ratio
    42
    Likes Ratio
    66

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    the retreat of the rebel forces where tactical ,now they go resorting to geurilla war which has also paid the price for the troops in iraq and afghanistan. Geurilla warfare is the most effective warfare. And can be very heavy for the french troops which mostly consists of 18 young old teenagers who like to shoot everyone lol most likely from call of duty..

    This is gonna be long and it will destabilize the region.

    Suicide bomber blows himself up near Mali soldiers, first attack of its kind

    A suicide bomber has blown himself up near Malian security troops in the central town of Gao, reports AFP. It’s the first suicide bombing on Malian troops since beginning their campaign with the French to wrest Mali’s north from Islamist militants.
    The suicide bomber approached a group of Malian troops on a motorbike before detonating his explosives and injuring one soldier, reported AFP, citing military sources.
    The suicide bomber "approached us on a motorbike, he was a Tamashek (Tuareg), and as he came closer he set off his belt," said First Sergeant Mamadou Keita to AFP.
    The bombing marks the first instance of militants employing suicide attacks as a tactic since the French-led campaign against Mali’s Islamists was launched three weeks ago.
    The attack follows a threat by two Islamist extremist groups, the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO),warning they had created a new “combat zone” and were organizing attacks on military convoys and placing landmines.
    Meanwhile, in Mali’s southern capital Bamako shooting was reported at a paratrooper base, sources told Reuters.
    The campaign to take back the North of Mali from the Islamist militants is now in its third week. Currently there are around 4,000 French troops deployed in the country aiding Malian security forces.
    French and Chadian forces have made progress in their push towards Mail’s north, advancing into the northeastern mountain range where militants are thought to be holding seven French hostages.
    The French-led assault has driven many of Mali’s rebels into the mountainous, amid fears they will adopt guerrilla-style tactics in the area.
    “All these Jihadis and armed groups and terrorist elements – seemingly they have fled. Our concern is that they may come back,”
    said UN leader Ban Ki-moon in New York. He echoed concerns over a possible guerrilla warfare backlash in Mali.

    http://rt.com/news/suicide-bomber-mali-soldiers-718/
    They're gonna invade Mali...

    http://www.youtube.com/user/robinb4life?feature=mhee
    I will not calm down until I will put one cheek of a tyrant on the ground and the other under my feet, and for the poor and weak, I will put my cheek on the ground.
    - Umar ibn khattab(Ra)
    wwwislamicboardcom - They're gonna invade Mali...
    chat Quote

  6. #64
    Independent's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Other
    Posts
    1,123
    Threads
    3
    Rep Power
    76
    Rep Ratio
    31
    Likes Ratio
    13

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    format_quote Originally Posted by Jedi_Mindset View Post
    This is gonna be long and it will destabilize the region.
    Let me get this straight. You're accusing the government of Mali of destabilising the region, by seeking to exert jurisdiction over its own sovereign territory?
    chat Quote

  7. Report bad ads?
  8. #65
    Jedi_Mindset's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Holland
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    1,345
    Threads
    67
    Rep Power
    83
    Rep Ratio
    42
    Likes Ratio
    66

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    format_quote Originally Posted by Independent View Post
    Let me get this straight. You're accusing the government of Mali of destabilising the region, by seeking to exert jurisdiction over its own sovereign territory?
    The region is already on fire, libya on the right if already considering a open weapon bazaar. Yes, the government is too blame also, the tuaregs wanted independence because they faced discimination.

    Military success in Mali raises fear of sectarian revenge attacks


    As French, Malian and troops from other African countries enter the key northern Malian towns of Gao, Timbuktu and Kidal, reports are emerging of revenge attacks against the Islamists and some of the local Tuareg and Arab population.
    As Malian and French forces closed in and retook Gao last weekend virtually unopposed, residents have been hunting down and beating up suspected Islamist extremists who did not have time to flee into the desert. Malian troops then bundled the suspected terrorists into a truck.
    Members of a youth militia called the Gao Patrolmen, went house to house hunting for suspected Islamists.
    “They have gone into homes to hide, so we’ve been rounding them up to hand them to the military,” Abdul Karim Samba, a spokesman for the group told AP.
    For almost a year al-Qaida linked extremists have controlled the town, where they swiftly introduced Sharia law, banning music and carrying out public executions and amputations.
    Troops from Chad, one of the African nations which has sent troops to help the Malian government and the French, were patrolling the streets, backed up by French soldiers overnight.
    Reports from Timbuktu say that residents have also attacked property there owned by Arab and Tuareg traders who are suspected of collaborating with the Islamic rebels.
    There were also reports Tuesday of widespread looting of shops in Timbuktu, which belonged to Arabs, with the Malian army unable to control the anger of many residents towards the Islamists. Many black African locals connect Arabs, who have lived in the town for hundreds of years – to the extreme Islamists because of their appearance and religion.

    Gonzalo Wancha, a freelance journalist in Mali, who was travelling north from Timbuktu with French and Malian soldiers, told RT that he saw evidence of war crimes committed against the local population. He said that residents of the town of Sevare had been murdered by Malian soldiers and then thrown into a well, used by locals for drinking water. He also said that there has been evidence of extra judicial killings. Many local Tuaregs and Arabs are being persecuted for allegedly collaborating with al-Qaeda, he added.
    Whilst it is too early to say exactly what has happened in Mali, it is inevitable that there will be civilian casualties in such a campaign in a country as poor as Mali where the rule of law has never been strictly enforced, Lode Vanoost, an international consultant and former deputy speaker of the Belgian parliament told RT.
    “First of all the Malian army does hold a grudge against the people who ousted them from the northern part of the country and secondly these soldiers are very low paid with very little armaments, they are not really a regular army in that sense. Mali is a very destitute country; it’s always the same tragedy. This country needs our support yes, this country needs our help but why is it this help always comes in the form of military intervention?” He said.

    Last night French forces also flew into the northern desert town of Kidal, one of the last strongholds for the Islamists.
    “The French arrived at 9:30 pm [Tuesday] aboard four planes. Afterwards they took the airport and then entered the town and there was no combat,” Haminy Maiga, the interim president of the Kidal region told AP.

    The Tuareg are Berbers who have lived a nomadic life across the Sahel and Sahara regions of north and west Africa for hundreds of years and make up 11% of the population of northern Mali.
    They populate the desert and semi desert areas of northern Mali and have always viewed themselves as different from the black Africans who live in the South and west of the country.
    Tuareg rebels have been waging an on-off secessionist war for decades against the Mali government in the capital Bamuko, situated in the south east of the country.
    But the Tuareg movement is split into different factions. The secular Tuareg nationalist militia (MNLA) has been fighting for an independent northern republic and has recently said that its supports the French military intervention.
    But Another group, the IslamistAnsar Dine, which includes many Tuareg fighters, which spearheaded last year’s successful attempt to take the north of Mali, has close links to al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). AQIM is a terrorist organization, which aims to overthrow the Algerian government and create an Islamist state.

    http://rt.com/news/mali-conflict-islamists-revenge-106/

    And now the malian government which isnt even being legimate by the malian people is asking FOREIGNERS to come and help them in this fight or genocide. This malian government is corrupt as hell and gets painted by the west as a legimate government. However the malian people know better.

    Yes the french are destabilizing the region, you know this is a big blowback thanks to NATO invasion led by france in libya.
    good is that dictators are gonne be overthrown, bad is that it will lead to destabilization.
    They're gonna invade Mali...

    http://www.youtube.com/user/robinb4life?feature=mhee
    I will not calm down until I will put one cheek of a tyrant on the ground and the other under my feet, and for the poor and weak, I will put my cheek on the ground.
    - Umar ibn khattab(Ra)
    wwwislamicboardcom - They're gonna invade Mali...
    chat Quote

  9. #66
    Independent's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Other
    Posts
    1,123
    Threads
    3
    Rep Power
    76
    Rep Ratio
    31
    Likes Ratio
    13

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    format_quote Originally Posted by Jedi_Mindset View Post
    Yes the french are destabilizing the region, you know this is a big blowback thanks to NATO invasion led by france in libya.
    good is that dictators are gonne be overthrown, bad is that it will lead to destabilization.
    Read up. Already covered much of this. And whenever you quote from RT you must remember that they support Gaddafi and Assad, and that their whole analysis is based on that position.

    Dictators don't usually give up power by themselves. Unfortunately you have to fight them. When you fight them, weapons saturate the country. Wars are nasty and civil wars are the nastiest of them all. People take revenge in all directions.

    So what do you do? Leave dictators in power forever? These guys are dynastic, and their sons are usually worse than the fathers. As I've said elsewhere, the best thing about a democracy is that you can get rid of your government at regular intervals without starting a war.

    I sympathise with the Tuareg. But why blame it all on Mali? There are several other states in the region who don't want to give them territory either. The only reason the Tuareg picked on Mali is because Mali was the least able to defend itself.

    Bad news for Mali.

    The fact is that there are minority populations in countries all over the world who get mistreated and want independence. How do you pick which ones you want to support?

    The Malian government had every right to look for help wherever they could. The entire state was on the point of collapse under the Ansar Dine invasion. How much more destabilising can you get? If Ansar Dine now revert to terrorist tactics and suicide bombs, that's not France's fault - it's Ansar Dine's.

    There is also a racial component in this between the mainly Arab north and the mainly black African south, which has caused tension in other countries especially Sudan. It's no coincidence that the all the troops supporting Mali are from black African countries. Mali has been invaded before by Arabs - Algeria tried to take it over 200 years ago.

    You should welcome the restoration of the Mali government and hope that Ansar Dine leave this desperately poor country in peace to recover itself.
    chat Quote

  10. #67
    سيف الله's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,971
    Threads
    336
    Rep Power
    98
    Rep Ratio
    16
    Likes Ratio
    15

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    Salaam

    Another update, interesting



    Looks like North Africa is going to be introduced to the wonders of Assassination by Drone.

    U.S. Signs Deal to Build Drone Base in Niger

    The Obama administration has formally signed an agreement with Niger allowing a permanent U.S. military site in the African country. Reports emerged this week that the United States will build a base in Niger from which to fly drones for surveillance and potentially even missile strikes. Niger borders Mali, where the United States is aiding a French-led military operation in the country’s north.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2013/1/30/headlines#1304
    chat Quote

  11. #68
    سيف الله's Avatar Full Member
    brightness_1
    IB Oldtimer
    star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate star_rate
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male
    Religion
    Islam
    Posts
    3,971
    Threads
    336
    Rep Power
    98
    Rep Ratio
    16
    Likes Ratio
    15

    Re: They're gonna invade Mali...

    Salaam

    Another interesting comment piece, this time by Peter Hitchens

    We need a Commons rebellion - not a stupid war in Timbuktu

    This is why I despise almost all Members of Parliament: our Prime Minister is taking us into yet another stupid war, and most MPs do not even care. Where is the rebellion? Where is the Opposition? Where are the demands for an emergency debate in which our motives and reasons for this latest nonsense are examined, torn to pieces and flung on the floor?

    There is no case at all for Britain to send soldiers to Mali, or any other part of North Africa. We have no interest there, never will have and never have had. If we truly fear terrorism so much, then this adventure is doubly moronic.

    It will give terrorists a pretext to attack our country that they did not have before. Like the Afghan war, it will also allow terrorists to kill us without needing to travel here.
    We will send our servicemen there, where the terrorists can more easily shoot them or blow them up.

    If, three or four years hence, British soldiers are returning from North Africa in coffins, the empty-headed cretins of our political class will place their hands reverently upon their chests and burble solemn tributes, as they do now when the dead come back from our equally futile mission in Afghanistan.

    Much less is said about the far larger numbers of terribly wounded young men, each of them worth 10,000 MPs, who will remain maimed or disfigured or both, long after those responsible are drawing plump pensions or being applauded by American matrons on the lucrative lecture circuit.

    How is it that people who know so little, and who are so incapable of learning anything from experience, dominate both politics and the higher levels of political journalism? In the past two years we have cheered on the installation of an Egyptian president who said in September 2010 that Israelis are descended from apes and pigs, and created a lawless, failed state in Libya so chaotic that we have to urge our own citizens to run from Benghazi for their lives. But you would barely know these things from either Parliament or the heavyweight media.

    It is not just that the Premier and his senior advisers plainly know no history. They seem also to have been asleep during the Blair years, when crude propaganda and cruder lies drove an expedition so foolish that those responsible should be so ashamed that they never show their faces in public again. Then there is Comrade ‘Doctor’ ‘Lord’ John Reid, the unrepentant former communist who gets hoity-toity when reminded that he sent British troops into deadly danger in Afghanistan while piously hoping that ‘we would be perfectly happy to leave in three years’ time without firing one shot’.

    Remember that piece of naive drivel when you examine our current Premier’s sudden transformation into the Warlord of the Maghreb, which began with promises of no boots on the ground and continued with an almost instant breach of that promise.

    Then go on to ask what all this is about. Once again, we are being told that we can, in some way, defeat terrorism. To know how foolish this is, you don’t even need to be able to read. You can go and see the new film Zero Dark Thirty, in which Jessica Chastain plays a gaunt, obsessive CIA woman on the trail of Osama Bin Laden.

    In the end, after a lot of disgusting torture, she finds him, mainly thanks to an overlooked old file that nobody had bothered to study.

    Bin Laden is killed, amid rather horrible scenes of weeping and terrified women and children, which are graphically and honestly shown. And, of course, the ‘War on Terror’ goes on exactly as before, because neither side particularly wants it to end.

    Or you can buy the DVD of a much better film, The Battle Of Algiers (Mr Cameron should do this), and so learn the miserable history of France’s last attempt to stage a ‘war on terror’ in Africa. Once again, there is hideous torture, which corrupted poor France for decades afterwards.

    There is also unspeakable terrorism. People do these ghastly things in the belief that they are doing good, and destroy themselves in the process. Then there is the illusion of victory, followed by the whole thing starting all over again.

    Thank heaven we have no need to be involved in this latest bout of futile tragedy. The Americans forced us to surrender to IRA terror in 1998, so we have no debts in that direction. France is and always will be our rival, not our ally, and the only rational explanation of Mr Cameron’s War in Timbuktu is that he is trying to reassure the European Union that he is its loyal servant.

    But why should anyone die for that?

    http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2013/02/we-need-a-commons-rebellion-not-a-stupid-war-in-timbuktu-3.html
    chat Quote


  12. Hide
Page 4 of 4 First ... 2 3 4
Hey there! They're gonna invade Mali... Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.

When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. They're gonna invade Mali...
Sign Up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
create