To my dismay Wikipedia's NPOV (Neutral Point of View) status has NOT been followed. It has turned into a hate mongering cess-pool of pro-Zionist propoganda. If any of you can help, with edits w/sources it would be great.
I have edited a few wikipedia post. One on Dr Zakir Naik, where he's misqoted sometime and is taken out of context, I corrected the information directly from his website, guess what couple of day's later it has been edited back to the original. Someone does not wan't the truth.
Also I added a few on so called Ali Sina, a devout anti-muslim. A added a section on a "fairy tale christianity" (no offense, not my words his words), with direct quote from him with reference to the relevant section. Guess what it has also been taken out, living only his propganda on Islam.
Wikipedia is more or less full of crap,and I aint bothered to really read from these websites. Maybe Next time if you decide you should save a few of you editing in "M-Words" so if it gets edited it out you can copy and paste it back.
What wikipedia has is the nuetral point of view, your just so out there biased to see it.
They don't like neutral, to them, "neutral" means "Big Bad Zionist Propaganda War Machine." They'll understand, one day.
"This world is a blank price tag, and whatever value you put on it, is what its worth to you. I have made this world priceless and worthless, so therefore I have placed my value in the afterlife."
What wikipedia has is the nuetral point of view, your just so out there biased to see it.
Would yuou agree that if one is going to cite someone they should cite the correctly in context?
I have corrected mis-information with clear reference and it all got edited out.
I have provided a nuetral point of view, and cited this people with correctly referenced, but it gets edited out.
Anyway, my lecturers will laugh at your suggestion.
Would yuou agree that if one is going to cite someone they should cite the correctly in context?
I have corrected mis-information with clear reference and it all got edited out.
I have provided a nuetral point of view, and cited this people with correctly referenced, but it gets edited out.
Anyway, my lecturers will laugh at your suggestion.
LOL lavikor.
I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
LOL. Lavikor, be in peace.
anyway, I really don't read Wikipedia very much nor get my info on what happening in Israel from wikipedia. I haven't read one article from it. I do read articles from Jews and americans and british authors to name a few.
What I was refering to in those case and actually not on the wikipedia artices provided in this opening thread, but some wikipedia articles that I talked about on one of my post here.
i.e. Zakir Naik and Ali Sina.
I'm glad I can provide humor into your schedule, of eating, sleeping, and bashing israel and jews.
Funniest thing I've heard - EVER! Many users on this site have that diet and they think its healthy. ffended:
"This world is a blank price tag, and whatever value you put on it, is what its worth to you. I have made this world priceless and worthless, so therefore I have placed my value in the afterlife."
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
Wow! I once wrote an article in the Street Gangs section, I showed it off to my friends; it was about how I and a close friend started a gang and ran closely with the Triads.
It got deleted.
"This world is a blank price tag, and whatever value you put on it, is what its worth to you. I have made this world priceless and worthless, so therefore I have placed my value in the afterlife."
yea one day i didnt realize that anyone can just edit or write something and i did on some topic and just wrote fart over and over and the next day it was there, so seriously, you cant take that site so seriously anymore
As I said, Wrote and added a few section with clear reference directly from he source.
It was not even my words I provided proper quotes within it's proper context.
It got deleted. It full of "bush crap".
Wikipedia is what it claims to be, a file of what has been written. I find it only usefull to find what has been said then use that as a starting point to find facts.
It is not much different then a google search. Type in any subject into google and you will be stuck with sorting out what is real, not just what is on the internet.
I made the error of posting wiki quotes as facts on one or two posts. Funny part was the person I was contradicting used wiki to find the exact opposite of what I had posted. Same source, opposite words.
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
Re: Wikipedia Needs Editors with The TRUTH
ffended:
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks