Not sure of the significance of this, but I thought it was interesting. Perhaps the Iraqi government is truly starting to crack down on the Shia militias. Any thoughts on what this means for the overall situation in Iraq?
"Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is."
the iraqi government is the main shi'a party and its militia, they are now attacking the smaller one of sadr to destroy a rival power base for shi'a islam in iraq.
I saw this too, I wonder what his plans are from Iran, do you think he could be gathering weapons or weapon technology, or is he just running in fear?
Fear, not a chance.
If caught he can't fight and kill people, besides he would become powerless.
I'm sure Iran will help, even more than they do now, to make him more powerfull.
Could Al-Sadr from Iran control his Mahdi Army, finance it and supply it with weapons openly, and gain unpopular ctiticism from America. All the more reason to get on Iran's case. Harbouring a terrorist?
I am shocked any country accepted this nutter. He's a shia nutter, now we know where Iran's loyalties lie. Its even more outrageous this coward calls himself mahdi. I know hes hiding from the Iraqi warriors keeping westerners at bay and dealing with cowards like him.
How can Chalabi jalebi run Iraq, he's been an exile for 20+ years.
Yesterday here in Canada I was Watching i think ER Baghdad On CBC. It was crazy some shia women was asking " were Is Saddam, Bring back Saddam". She said Saddam's terror was better than random bombs going off everywhere. The Men in the Car were the same. They said every time they want to close a road the Americans end up opening it then more people die. He claimed the sooner the Americans leave the faster the Iraqi's will make peace amongst themselves.
Listen there is no point for civil war amongst Muslims . Americans are to blame for Iraq chaos
There is no point, I agree. So why are they doing it?, and what did the U.S. do, besides bring down their dictator, to force them into killing each other? There is plenty of blame to go around, but in the end the fault lies with those who have embraced chaos instead of stability.
"Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is."
If we are levying out responsibility for ths current civil war in Iraq, the first names mentioned should be Saddam Hussein (for massacres and subjugation of Shi'a) and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi (for terrorist attacks at Shi'a civilians) .
If we are levying out responsibility for ths current civil war in Iraq, the first names mentioned should be Saddam Hussein (for massacres and subjugation of Shi'a) and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi (for terrorist attacks at Shi'a civilians) .
Hey there! Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
When you create an account, we remember exactly what you've read, so you always come right back where you left off. You also get notifications, here and via email, whenever new posts are made. And you can like posts and share your thoughts. Sign Up
Yesterday here in Canada I was Watching i think ER Baghdad On CBC. It was crazy some shia women was asking " were Is Saddam, Bring back Saddam". She said Saddam's terror was better than random bombs going off everywhere. The Men in the Car were the same. They said every time they want to close a road the Americans end up opening it then more people die. He claimed the sooner the Americans leave the faster the Iraqi's will make peace amongst themselves.
Hide
Looks like you're enjoying the discussion, but you're not signed up for an account.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks