But only if you've HEARD about Islam, and reject it, then you're going to hell? So what if you're confused about what to follow, and you're a very skeptic person? Like I was, and still am. What if you don't just read something and believe it just because someone else says it's true? What if you're not gullable? What if you want proof to find out for yourself? What if you're confused about which choice to make?
Ah, the very core of the problem for people with a fact driven mind (my problem). We require proof. It is difficult to just accept. No religion seems to fit because none have proof.
God blesses us with this logical mind. Should we then be punished for the inability to accept things that we cannot back with logic? I think that would be cruel. Is God cruel?
This has lead me to some questions and assumptions.
One of the assumptions is that athiests don't have the problem with all these questions, because they are running on pure logic, and that logic says that there is no god. If any athiests disagree, please correct this for me.
One question is if these questions are what an agnostic ponders? Is there another reason besides any of these questions that an agnostic would be an agnostic? Am I an agnostic? I feel like the computer/robot on a low budget movie I saw once, "need more input! need more input!"
Sometimes I would describe my thinking as confused, and othertimes not as confused, just unconvinced(need more input!).
I wonder if all agnostics think roughly the same way about these things. Or if some are confused, while others just unconvinced. Is it confusion or a lack of logic?
I think Snakelegs being an agnostic, would be a great person to contribute if she would like.