'Abd-al Latif
CagePrisoners.com
- Messages
- 3,680
- Reaction score
- 921
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
This is what Arafat turned down . . .
What was offered and what took place at the Camp David and Taba negotiations:
1. Yasser Arafat presented no ideas at Camp David.
2. The Taba talks would have happened in late September if not for the outbreak of violence. Arafat knew the US was ready to make a proposal and thus promised to control the violence, but didn't. (I think he was hoping that he could leverage the violence into political gain.)
3. All of Gaza and a net of 97% of the West Bank were offered at Taba.
4. The West Bank area offered was contiguous, not "cantons".
5. The Jordan valley would be under Israeli patrol for only 6 years.
6. The Palestinians were offered a capital in eastern Jerusalem.
7. There would be a "Right of Return" to the nascent Palestinian state.
8. A $30 Billion fund to compensate refugees would be set up.
9. Taba was rushed due to Clinton's, not Barak's, end of term.
10. Members of the PA delegation thought Taba was the best they could hope to get and encouraged Arafat to accept it.
11. Arafat accepted everything he was given at Taba, but rejected everything HE was supposed to give.
12. Arafat scuttled the Camp David offer. Arafat scuttled the Taba offer. Arafat scuttled the Mitchell plan. Arafat scuttled the Tenet plan. Arafat scuttled the Zinni plan.
http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000555.html
Many of the 'Muslim' rulers are not, and have not been running by the law of Islam. They do what's in their best interests, just as Mahmoud Abbas blames hamas for the current war between Israel and Palestine, which no sound minded person - let alone the leader of Palestine - will say or at least not during the war itself.
Palestine/Israel rightfully belongs to the Muslims and Jerusalem is considered as the Holy Land and this is clear in the minds of the muslims who know their religion. Frequent raids, harasments, harm and oppression is carried out in the west bank by the Israeli soldiers and their silence has been loss. Hamas chooses to stand up and fight against the oppressors - who receive treatment which is no different then in the west bank -, but their own 'leader' critises them for trying to take back what belongs to them.
What does this tell you?
Are the leaders really elected by the people, or by western governments who have the power and authority to so, secretly? Are they really looking out for their people or are they looking out for their own pocket? Hamas was elected by the people, and look how staunchly the west opposes them!
Look what the BBC have said about Mahmoud Abbas:
He was also the man favoured by the international community and Israel to succeed Arafat.
You yourself question Yasser Arafat, what makes you think he is any different from Mahmoud Abbas?
Their agenda is almost unknown, but it certainly isn't for the benefit for the Muslims/Palestinians.
Last edited: