You are missing the point (purposely I suspect).
Look who's talking.
There is nothing wrong with dressing differently there is something wrong with making a conscious decision to dressing differently than other groups just to make a visual point that you are different – that is divisive.
And I could point you to a load of 'non-comformist' type non-Muslims who dress differently for exactly that reason - to appear different from the norm. Somehow I doubt you would find these people a threat to integration, unity, peace, and strength in numbers (TM).
I wouldn't find them a threat at all. Let people dress the way they want, so long as they comply with the law. What do you find so hard to understand about that?
And, really, saying people who dress differently for the sake of being different are divisive buttholes is one of the most absurd, Daily Mail-esque tirades I've heard in a long time.
As for disliking people 'making a visual point that they're different'? I don't suppose you're very well acquanited with the world of women's fashion. I suppose all involved are being divisive and are a threat to Strength through Unity, Unity through Faith.
Am I still missing your point, or simply disagreeing with it?
Or in your mind, are those two outcomes indistinguishable?
And, more to the point, which of these single paragraphs will you choose to reply to, and how many of them will you completely ignore? Come back, next post, same Bat-Time, same Bat-Channel.
And returning to your reply to my quote . . . . .
I despair because I love my country and want all the citizens of that country to live in peace and harmony and work together towards common goals aimed at providing us with a secure and prosperous future.
You said: Is that so? From reading your posts, I think that you want people to conform to your own personal standards of The Way Things Ought To Be, and if they don't, they are not to be tolerated. Or rather, a cause for 'despair'.
Response . . . .My personal standards; I encourage, integration, unity, peace and tolerance those are my standards and I urge others to conform to those standards. If my neighbours advocate segregation, disunity and intolerance I consider that intolerable. What part of that do you object to?
The part where anyone with a dissenting opinion of what constitutes integration, unity and peace is painted as a hypocritical advocate of segregation, disunity and intolerance.
In essence you are saying: 'I don't like the way these people dress. They are Bad People for dressing that way, for that reason. They should dress the way I like them to dress, for the reasons I like. Then they will be Good People.'
In essence I am saying: 'Don't be ridiculous. Get out more and open your mind. You'll be a happier person.'
Also - love how you completely ignored this little snippet:
'Anyway, is a Sikh being divisive when he wears a turban and a beard? Is a Jew being divisive when he wears a skullcap, or a hat, a long coat and a beard? Is a nun being divisive when she wears a habit? Is a monk being divisive when he wears a robe and takes a vow of silence? Are the Hare Krishnas by McDonald's being divisive when they dress in their own way and sing their own songs to passersby? Are Goths being divisive when they dress in black and are generally Goth-like?'
Great tactics. If you don't like what the other guy is saying, just accuse him of deliberately missing the point and ignore any points that damage your own. Consider a career in politics.