Sorry my last post was a mess.
"Let us suppose one can trace a book back to its author - would that mean it is therefore a Holy book? I cannot be sure what your argument is here but one supposes your chain of narrators goes back to the Prophet so was he the author of the Qu'ran?"
We don't SUPPOSE that we trace a reveleation, we can trace back the reveleation of the Qur'an to Muhammad,saws.
The chain of narrations proves the reveleation ORIGINAL. Therefore, this is the purpose of my argument that the Qur'an is original Qur'an and that the Bible isn't, so, that is why we don't use it. The Qur'an was not written as a narrative or a book. In fact the Qur'an is not a book. While Bible means a book, Qur'an means recitaion. God called it a recitation because he made it a FORM of poetry, pose, rhyme so people can memorize it from top to cover.
Muhamamd was illeterate. So, he can not be an author. People coultn't write at the time. There was no schools neither did books exist so writting was not used. The Qur'an is Muhammad,saws, walking. He knew it by memory.
"I have no idea what this is about Christians and the Jews as if they have completely separate manuscript collections of the Old Testament - do you really think that?"
No, I said that the Septuagist disagrees with the Hebrew Torah of the Jews in 1900 instances. The purpose I said this is to show that there was attribution of men to the Bible. Again, I don't "think" I don't want to "think" this verse is by men this by God. Because we don't know and I don't want to reject words of God and accept words of men. CAN I MAKE MY SELF ANY CLEARER????
"I doubt that ALL Muslims do this and many other people pray regularly and work hard but Christians and Jews revere their parents but only worship God"
The purpose I said this is not that Christians don't obey their parants!
I said this because the argument was that we Muslims don't need the Bible. We only need the Qur'an to be Muslims.
"Let us suppose one can trace a book back to its author - would that mean it is therefore a Holy book? I cannot be sure what your argument is here but one supposes your chain of narrators goes back to the Prophet so was he the author of the Qu'ran?"
We don't SUPPOSE that we trace a reveleation, we can trace back the reveleation of the Qur'an to Muhammad,saws.
The chain of narrations proves the reveleation ORIGINAL. Therefore, this is the purpose of my argument that the Qur'an is original Qur'an and that the Bible isn't, so, that is why we don't use it. The Qur'an was not written as a narrative or a book. In fact the Qur'an is not a book. While Bible means a book, Qur'an means recitaion. God called it a recitation because he made it a FORM of poetry, pose, rhyme so people can memorize it from top to cover.
Muhamamd was illeterate. So, he can not be an author. People coultn't write at the time. There was no schools neither did books exist so writting was not used. The Qur'an is Muhammad,saws, walking. He knew it by memory.
"I have no idea what this is about Christians and the Jews as if they have completely separate manuscript collections of the Old Testament - do you really think that?"
No, I said that the Septuagist disagrees with the Hebrew Torah of the Jews in 1900 instances. The purpose I said this is to show that there was attribution of men to the Bible. Again, I don't "think" I don't want to "think" this verse is by men this by God. Because we don't know and I don't want to reject words of God and accept words of men. CAN I MAKE MY SELF ANY CLEARER????
"I doubt that ALL Muslims do this and many other people pray regularly and work hard but Christians and Jews revere their parents but only worship God"
The purpose I said this is not that Christians don't obey their parants!
I said this because the argument was that we Muslims don't need the Bible. We only need the Qur'an to be Muslims.