Says who?
Rather I point out the obvious!
ah, but they were not dating, they were married, and again, you have no insight as to whether or not they have the same level of maturity or commonalities.. you go by some imaginary cut off line.. one that determines that marriage is a no no but sexual intercourse is acceptable, as evidenced by BCP's being handed to 11 year olds in middle school.. what can we call that other than what it is?
What is your point? see paragraph one.. if there was no baby, and they'd gotten married (period) would he still be facing up charges? people don't know what others do in their bedroom, she certainly didn't complain, and they were making it official!
I think it is obvious what I am arguing for.. there is no changing the fact of the matter.. it has happened and they tried to rectify their mistake by having a family unit!.. what is the point to throw perhaps the only source of income for this new infant in jail because some morons decided she is an idiot and he is a pedophile?
and by whose's standards she is a child. For God's sake she gave birth to a baby and you are calling her a child. She is a woman biologically! Saying she is young aged and mentally not mature is another thing but calling her a child and thus labeling her boyfriend pedophile, come on!
I never said I was 'Against' them marrying, harm has been done, it is about rectifying the situation not making it worst (you don't know what is best for this particular family) there isn't a set standard by which all society should be governed, in some places in Africa the life expectancy is 44, their population is actually dwindling, do you propose that they marry at the tender age of 25 because you deem that suitable and not criminal? .. if her husband or husband to be lands in jail she is on her own as an 11 year old single mother! Them being married at least guarantees some semblance of security, financial or otherwise!
See above, it is really not that difficult to understand..
I really don't give a **** what you do or don't do.. you are not someone whose life is of interest nor are you the topic of this subject!
no, it is you who need to some reality check and few slaps to knock some sense into you. putting aside the whole sex thing, if two people agree to get married and they both are capable of handling the marriage, physically, mentally and financially then who the heck are you to say they should not get married or support the moronic idiotic law to stop this from happening? Who gave you the right to butt in other people's private affairs and speak on behalf of supposedly 'victim', who does not even agree with you? Who in the world told you that age matters in marriage? What matters is 4 things I mentioned above: consent, physical, mental and financial ability to handle the marriage. These contradictory and moronic laws of age of marriage which your countries have passed have no value in the real world. Funny thing is that none of your countries agree with each other on deciding this age: when someone is mature and has become a man or woman! You want us to follow this rubbish, no thanks, keep it yourself and living in deluded world of 'superior ground in morality'. How funny that you attack us based on these flawed morals!
Do you think an 11 year old can comprehend the immensity of having a child and being a single mother? I think you constantly miss the point entirely!
You don't know who is capable of what, my 11 year old niece has already skipped two grades in school, her level of intellect is that of a 9th grader instead of a sixth grader.. again, what formal survey or study have you done, and if you have does everyone fall in the center of a bell shaped curve?
Yeah, you think she has no clue.. but the facts are already on the table.. an infant will not go back to being a zygote and imprisoning her would be husband will in fact exacerbate an already bad situation... This is no longer a matter of prevention (as stated previously and twice, I don't think people should be married or having kids at 11) yet they have and they do.. the logical approach is to fix the situation, not make it worst.. one day this infant will grow up thinking he is a b astard child, and that his father is a rapist, even though he isn't, and that his mother is a w hore..
Again, not a topic on precocious puberty, rather normal physiological menses which is defined by the American pediatric association to fall between the ages of (9-16) under either circumstance and like everything else you bring to the table is completely irrelevant to our purposes here!
Perhaps it has to do with how you read and process information, and given your just above statement seems to cements that charge!
you can have a doctorate and play with toys!
I think this is an excellent perceptiveness into your own shortcomings and psyche!
Neither of these statements, although amusing to you on some level have any relevance to the topic or the point you are trying to make, if you ever had one!
Until such a time we see your double blind study with a tight confidence interval separating the two in all populations can we do the obvious with your testimony, which is to bin it!
Again, see my previous post and this one.. puberty and menses aren't one in the same .. menstruation is the crowning result of that and the ability to bear children.. I really do think there is something wrong with how you read and process info.
What does this mean?
I have been trying to figure out what it is you are posting.. I think you are having difficulty bringing this plane in for a landing?