Also,
Look at the following translated from Pickthal: "Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them..." 7:157
Or this one
And when there cometh unto them a scripture from Allah, confirming that in their possession - though before that they were asking for a signal triumph over those who disbelieved - and when there cometh unto them that which they know (to be the truth) they disbelieve therein. The curse of Allah is on disbelievers. 2:90
7:157 is especially interesting because gives the impression that we (or the Muslim) would be able to find Muhammed talked about in the Torah (the books of Moses) and the Gospel (which I take to mean the life and teaching of Jesus) that are with us. Either this text is timeless, and applies to every generation since written, or else it is in reference to that generation in which it was written...between 600-623AD.
We do have whole copies dating from the 5th century, and ancient translations from the same time period. I find it hard to understand why Muslims would try to convince Christians and others that the New Testament (or Old) has been malicously corrupted so much that the actual Gospel has been lost. The speal from the Qur'an is that I (or a Muslim) should be able to find Muhammed spoken of in the Old and New Testaments. But, then I am told that the Old and New Testaments have been so corrupted that they cannot be relied upon as a source of guidence.
Never once does the Old or New Testament reference a future book, such as the Qur'an, in the manner in which the Qur'an references the Old and New Testament. And I am not seeing in the Qur'an's teaching any thought that the Torah and Gospel which is with me is unreliable.
And this part, "And when there cometh unto them a scripture from Allah, confirming that in their possession..." What is meant by "confirmign that in their possession" If the first part is to refer to the Qur'an, and the later part to the Old and New Testaments (Bible), then why would it be supposed that the Bible has been corrupted beyond recognition? Doesn't this Surah suggest any corruption at all? Wouldn't the skeptical Jew or Christian search their Scriptures to see if the things Muhammed claimed were true.
It would be just like when the Apostle Paul went and preached to the Berean Jews that it says they searching the Scriptures daily to see if the things Paul preached were true. Paul never once chided them if they did not believe by suggesting the the Old Testament Scriptures were corrupt!! Rather, he worked to show them FROM the Scripture that Jesus is the Messiah, Son of God, crucified, and risen from the dead.
Again, it is said that the Christians twisted and corrupted their Scriptures. This implies intent, full knowledge. Which means malicious intent, fraud, deceipt, and of the worst kind, to decieve men in such a way that doesn't just rob them of temporal goods, but eternal. Why would such ones, when being persecuted by Rome or others, not immediately give up and sacrifice to the gods? It is a fact of history that if the Christians were to show their allegience to Ceaser, by offering to the gods and calling Ceaser Lord, they would be released. Yet, they chose to hold to their faith and suffer the most cruel penalties.
It is sometimes rebuffed in that men of conviction have often died for what they believed in. True enough. But this is not the point we are making. We are not saying that because Christians suffered and died for their belief, therefore it is true. We are answering the critic who is suggesting that the Christians themselves with malicious and purposeful intent corrupted their Scriptures for their own personal gain would then later choose to suffer the loss of all things, even their lives, to maintain such a ruse. We find this very incredible, if not impossible, to believe. A man may die for a lie believing it to be true, but who dies for a lie knowing it is such?
My point is this. I am hearing from Muslims that the Bible is so corrupt that it cannot be trusted. I am looking at the words of the Qur'an to see if this view comes from it, but I cannot find it. Here is the kind of thing I keep finding...
Let the People of the Gospel judge by that which Allah hath revealed therein. Whoso judgeth not by that which Allah hath revealed: such are evil-livers. 5:47
If you go and read that in context, it is most certainly referring to the Old and New Testament. This Surah is NOT speaking to Muslims per se, but to the Christians (who else is the People of the Gospel), and it is saying to us to judge by that which God has revealed to us in the Law and Gospel, Torah and Injeel, Old and New Testaments. To such an admonision I agree to. I am glad to listen, hear, weigh and test the things taught by Muhammed as seen in the Qur'an and judge them by what is revealed by God beforehand in the Old and New Testaments.