Can We Coexist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snakelegs
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 160
  • Views Views 21K
Those from the West that are in the middle east for purposes other than those stated are there either for escapism/vacation etc or to help fund charity. Other than that, no reason for the west to be in the middle east.

You forget that most of the West's important religious sites are in the Middle East.

Now, i'm assuming someone will innevitable reply "what aboot the middle east in ze west?" - well, the west is pretty dang good to live in in terms of education and finance, so that's probably the only reason the middle east is in the west.

Umm Shaheed says the only reason to be in the West is Dawa. That may appeal to you all but it does not really apeal to me. Think, if you went to Saudi Arabia you would not have to lower your gaze all the time!

The longer I am here the more I think coexistence is not possible or at least not worth it. Not worth one more suicide bomb.
 
All u guys come to INDIA, all the religions in the world are present in INDIA......... only very very rarely communal collision occurs........ except that INDIA = UNITY IN DIVERSITY
 
The oil purpose is a legitimate business practice. What has Western business in the Middle East done for the economies of Middle Eastern countries? I think many people in Middle Eastern countries can appreciate the affects the oil business has brought.
I am in agreement with you. When it comes to financial stuff, at this present moment in time, it does seem that the West is better at it.

However, that ruling doesn't always include Western Law - applying different laws (this can be applied to all types of law) to different cultures is not a clever move; if however the people decide and vote for it, then fine, no problem.

Heigou said:
You forget that most of the West's important religious sites are in the Middle East.
Valid point, but very few will actually go out of their way to go these sites. Additionally, if the western religious sites are in the middle east, perhaps the west should move back into the middle east, no? but they do not, just as those from the middle east in the west do not "go back" to the middle east - bringing religion into it will lead into the same argument.

Umm Shaheed says the only reason to be in the West is Dawa. That may appeal to you all but it does not really apeal to me. Think, if you went to Saudi Arabia you would not have to lower your gaze all the time!

Again valid points, but I live in the west for other reasons - namely education and finance. Sure, it's probably easier to practice my religion in the middle east, but no single muslim is representative of every muslim - do not forget we are human beings and all human beings are different. Though our similarites are plentifull, we each have differences.

The longer I am here the more I think coexistence is not possible or at least not worth it.
The fact that I'm living peacefully in my home in Leicester England indicates that coexistence (including peaceful) is possible - all it takes is tolerance.
Not worth one more suicide bomb.
Whether Islam is in the west or not, suicide bombing will occur - the two aren't positively correlated since suicide bombing has no place in Islam.

Although, the follow up/counter reply is probably going to say: "er...only muslims are suicide bombers" - in recent events, yes. But as I said earlier, one follower is not representative of all followers and those that do commit these actions, are wrong.
 
Last edited:
Heigou said:
You forget that most of the West's important religious sites are in the Middle East.
Valid point, but very few will actually go out of their way to go these sites. Additionally, if the western religious sites are in the middle east, perhaps the west should move back into the middle east, no? but they do not, just as those from the middle east in the west do not "go back" to the middle east - bringing religion into it will lead into the same argument.

I wonder how many go to Jerusalem or Bethlehem each year? Israel tried moving back but I don't think that worked out for them.

Again valid points, but I live in the west for other reasons - namely education and finance. Sure, it's probably easier to practice my religion in the middle east, but no single muslim is representative of every muslim - do not forget we are human beings and all human beings are different. Though our similarites are plentifull, we each have differences.

I never asked - how did your exams go?

As for the comment itself, well, I take your point. But really in the end your education and your finances are about you. Not about, say, me. If we can't co-exist, well, it wouldn't directly affect me. Of course you may grow up to be the guy who cures cancer. I assume you would have to do that in the West. But then the guy down the road may end up cutting my throat.

The longer I am here the more I think coexistence is not possible or at least not worth it.

The fact that I'm living peacefully in my home in Leicester England indicates that coexistence (including peaceful) is possible - all it takes is tolerance.

It proves that you and me can coexist. For now anyway. As long as nothing else changes.

Not worth one more suicide bomb.
Whether Islam is in the west or not, suicide bombing will occur - the two aren't positively correlated since suicide bombing has no place in Islam.

Suicide bombing may have no place in Islam but the two are correlated. If Britain had no Muslims it would also have no suicide bombings. It is noticable that the three of the four large non-Muslim European countries with the most significant Muslim communities, France, Britain and Spain have had a problem. Germany hasn't but then its Muslims are mainly Turks. In terms of percentage the Western countries with the most Muslims are France, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Again three out of the four have had problems.

But as I said earlier, one follower is not representative of all followers and those that do commit these actions, are wrong.

I would not deny that but still suicide bombers in the West come from one community and one community alone. They may not represent that Faith community, but they do not originate in other Faith communities.
 
All u guys come to INDIA, all the religions in the world are present in INDIA......... only very very rarely communal collision occurs........ except that INDIA = UNITY IN DIVERSITY
Same here in the US. I guess that's why we get along with India so well now.
 
Re: Muslim leaders condemn terrorism

Oh definetly,there are ALOT of major problems out there,i never have and never will deny that.

But at the end of the day,it all comes down to Us,are we (im not talking about you and i :p ) willing to do anything about it,or sit on our behinds and point the finger at each other.

This is where interfaith dialogue comes in.



What can i say,..people need to be educated.

Heck,..dare i say,...Muslims before the rest of the world.

That is the reason i have been against cyber-terrorists/jihadists from the day i started posting on this forum.

there are alot of misguided teens...even adults out there who need to learn their religon properly,they read 1 or 2 verse from the Holy Quran and strap themselves with a bomb thinking "...my beautiful 7 virgins,im coming to getcha!" well,it doesnt work that way.

anyway,before i go too-far-off topic and offend anyone,i will shut up.

wa'salaam.


quite suprising bro i agree with you on this matter!
 
As long as there is a quid pro quo - Islam has to get out of the West and not get involved in countries where they have no business.
One's a religion and one is a political entity!!
Out of curiosity, can anyone explain to me why the West should get out of the Middle East but the Middle East shouldn't get out of the West?
The Middle East is in the West?? ;D Which Middle Eastern country is manipulating western politics in the way the west is manipulating middle eastern politics?

It seems poor analogies are the major obstacle to peaceful coexistence. :rollseyes

Regards
 
:sl:
I wonder how many go to Jerusalem or Bethlehem each year? Israel tried moving back but I don't think that worked out for them.
Fair point, but it;s not like every christian or jew goes, do they? And on a similar note, it is not as if every muslim goes for hajj. Yes, i'm aware that there are individual circumstances involve, and that is actually part of the point i'm making: the "solution" that is being suggested (west go back to west, middle east go back to middle east) wouldn't work.

I never asked - how did your exams go?
Pretty well actually - i'm predicted two C's and an A.

As for the comment itself, well, I take your point. But really in the end your education and your finances are about you. Not about, say, me. If we can't co-exist, well, it wouldn't directly affect me. Of course you may grow up to be the guy who cures cancer. I assume you would have to do that in the West. But then the guy down the road may end up cutting my throat.
Ah but you see, the very fact that i'm here for the education means that I have been able to put my differences aside - if i hadn't, then i'd probably have moved by now. And just for the record, i'm hoping to work in the business section - so heck maybe you'll purchase from me in the not too distant future.

It proves that you and me can coexist.
I can say the same for about 90% of people I know.
For now anyway. As long as nothing else changes.
Then you have nothing to worry about. The West will not change unless the people vote for it.

Suicide bombing may have no place in Islam but the two are correlated. If Britain had no Muslims it would also have no suicide bombings. It is noticable that the three of the four large non-Muslim European countries with the most significant Muslim communities, France, Britain and Spain have had a problem. Germany hasn't but then its Muslims are mainly Turks. In terms of percentage the Western countries with the most Muslims are France, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. Again three out of the four have had problems.
I'm wondering if anyone else noted that these bombings only occured after 9/11. Perhaps, the connection lies there.

I would not deny that but still suicide bombers in the West come from one community and one community alone. They may not represent that Faith community, but they do not originate in other Faith communities.
Valid point. However, sending all muslims back to the middle east wouldn't solve the problem - suicide bombings still occur in Iraq and Israel/Palestine. The solution to this problem is not as simple as you make it out to be - sure if you send all the muslims back to the middle east, the West won't get suicide bombed etc, but will it stop people like OBL (for example)?

Passing a problem onto someone else is all very easy and works in the short term. But it doesn't solve the problem as it is still there.
 
HeiGou said:
As long as there is a quid pro quo - Islam has to get out of the West and not get involved in countries where they have no business.
One's a religion and one is a political entity!!

Well technically one is a religion and a political entity, while the other is just a political entity with an indigenous form of philosophy and quasi-morality.
 
Well technically one is a religion and a political entity
I'm afraid not; Islam is a religion that provides guidance in political affairs, it is not a political entity that makes decisions, passes laws, invades countries, etc.
 
One's a religion and one is a political entity!!

The Middle East is in the West?? ;D Which Middle Eastern country is manipulating western politics in the way the west is manipulating middle eastern politics?

I was referring to Middle Eastern people being in the West. This in theory is fine but when they challenge Western practices it seems out of line.

It seems poor analogies are the major obstacle to peaceful coexistence. :rollseyes

Regards
:) :) :)
 
Aamirsaab, you present a number of, very nice sounding, points.

However I can’t help but feel that you, like Ansar Al-‘Adl, are offering the same sort of thinking (I will leave it at that).

The most important thing, at the end of day, is the personal right to pursuit of happiness.

Islam is the biggest threat to that, in the West, right now. You seem to gloss over the suicide bomber.

England and Ireland fought a war for a very long time. There were many acts of terror carried out by the IRA. I don’t recall any (although there may have been one or two) suicide bombings.

It does seem, to me, that suicide bombing is a product of Islamist militants. The Western world has asked for Muslims help in dealing with this.

For a large part of the Muslim world, judging by the posts I have seen on this site (It is saddening to note that this is one of the milder Islamic message boards, yet the, seemingly, supporters of Bin Laden types, are here are at least 30% of the group), Islam is not ready or willing or able to deal with that problem.

Those that support such things, such as suicide bombing, like to point to Palestine and say “Well those poor folks don’t have any other means to fight the Zionist with”, well that leads me to this.

That same statement doesn’t hold true for those in Iraq blowing their selves up in the name of Islam, surely they have many other means to carry on the fight.

There are a number of posts on this site stating, that what these folks are doing is against the teachings of Islam. Fine, Great, Glad to hear it. But there always seems to be a “but”.

It is like when someone say’s “I am sorry, but”. That isn’t an “I’m sorry” at all. What it is, is an attempt to justify the actions that are being apologized for, as in “I am sorry for what I did, but, what you did drove me to it”.

What I find so sad about all that is going on right now is this.

The amount of money and lives that is being wasted on both sides, in disagreeing could have had such better results with just a few changes on both the East and the West’s parts.

Never before, in my life time, has the West been more willing to spend hard earned dollars on helping things in the East. Never before, in my life time, has the East been so quick to reject and condemn the West (take a look at Rou’s posts on his thread Bringing Democracy to the East, or however it is titled).




I don’t know, perhaps it has always been this way, and only the fact we have the internet to see it for our selves just makes it seem like a recent development, I don’t know.

What I do know is that there are three groups of folks in this world, those that are part of the solution, those that are part of the problem, and those that are not helping one way or the other.

Today, Islam seems (if this site is any indication) to be made up, by and large, of the latter two groups.

Why is Islam fighting with Russia over Chechnya???? What does it have to do with any ancient Islamic land ownership?
That is the justification given for the Palestine’s isn’t it, that is also the justification given by some on this site in their support of Somalia’s threats to Ethiopia right now, isn’t it?

As I have stated in a number of my posts, reform of Islam will have to be lead by Muslims, or, this will only get uglier and uglier, and many folks will suffer needlessly for it, both in the East as well as the West.

The East is, today, making the same sorry mistake as the West did over the last 50 or 60 years. The West supported many bad people like the Shaw<sp> of Iran, and Marcos, and Noriega, and any other number of other despots, just as long as they were willing to play ball.

If Saddam had been willing to play ball with the West, he would still be sitting pretty (that say’s many sad things about the West).

For all of GWB’s faults (believe me, I am not a supporter of his), at least he has seen that parts of our/USA’s foreign policy has, for a long time now, been wrong headed. He has also faced up to the fact that the Bin Ladens of the world are not going away by them selves.

What I have came to understand about the Bin Ladens of the world is this, either quit breathing or convert.

I don’t freely choose to do either.

Until all the Bin Ladins are gone and those that support Bin Ladin, or refuse to help fight the Bin Ladins, and the West will not peacefully co-exist with the Middle East.

It is a shame that we spend some much time arguing, instead of trying to find common ground. But it is rather like what I was told on the “Comparative Religion” section when I tried to find common ground, “Anything that disagrees with Islam, WE disagree with”.

Aamirsaab, as an aside, two things that I have found amazing to me is this:

Jesus was opposed by the Jewish folks because of his contradictory teachings.
Islam is opposed to my understandings of Jesus’ teachings as well….. yet the Muslims on this site can’t even tell me what the teachings of Jesus were. Amazing.

The second thing I find amazing is this, the number of folks that post “I wish the whole world was ruled by Shira Law/Islam, yet when we look at how quick Islam descended into bickering after Muhammad’s passing……. Look at the thread “The last truly Islamic State?” and all the examples given…..sad….. just really sad.

Sorry about my post sort of being a scatter-gun approach Aamirsaab, it just seems that you may be a reasonable enough of a person for it to have been worth while.

Thanks
Nimrod
 
Last edited:
:sl:
Oh boy this is fun.
The most important thing, at the end of day, is the personal right to pursuit of happiness.
Indeed it is.

Islam is the biggest threat to that, in the West, right now. You seem to gloss over the suicide bomber.
Islam is perceived as the biggest threat, yes. The reality of it is Islam isn't - but that's another story for another time. About the suicide bombings - of course it's a problem - i just don't like going into details of it - death and anything connected are not things that I like talking about as it causes anger and thus clouds judgement.

England and Ireland fought a war for a very long time. There were many acts of terror carried out by the IRA. I don’t recall any (although there may have been one or two) suicide bombings.
True.

It does seem, to me, that suicide bombing is a product of Islamist militants. The Western world has asked for Muslims help in dealing with this.
This is true, and the help is appreciated - it may not be said, but it is definately felt.

For a large part of the Muslim world, judging by the posts I have seen on this site (It is saddening to note that this is one of the milder Islamic message boards, yet the, seemingly, supporters of Bin Laden types, are here are at least 30% of the group), Islam is not ready or willing or able to deal with that problem.
Again valid points - it's a case of not enough muslims doing enough - a point that has been regularly told in the mosques since this whole thing started.

Those that support such things, such as suicide bombing, like to point to Palestine and say “Well those poor folks don’t have any other means to fight the Zionist with”, well that leads me to this.

That same statement doesn’t hold true for those in Iraq blowing their selves up in the name of Islam, surely they have many other means to carry on the fight.
And you will find many muslims say the same - the ones that don't will be now refered to as "the crazy ones" - who are much disliked.

There are a number of posts on this site stating, that what these folks are doing is against the teachings of Islam. Fine, Great, Glad to hear it. But there always seems to be a “but”.

It is like when someone say’s “I am sorry, but”. That isn’t an “I’m sorry” at all. What it is, is an attempt to justify the actions that are being apologized for, as in “I am sorry for what I did, but, what you did drove me to it”.

What I find so sad about all that is going on right now is this.

The amount of money and lives that is being wasted on both sides, in disagreeing could have had such better results with just a few changes on both the East and the West’s parts.
Again, I agree with you. Killing innocent civilians should never be justified though. I know we get a few crazy freaks on here that are "pro anything that hurts non muslims" on this forum - i've seen my fair share of them.

Never before, in my life time, has the West been more willing to spend hard earned dollars on helping things in the East. Never before, in my life time, has the East been so quick to reject and condemn the West (take a look at Rou’s posts on his thread Bringing Democracy to the East, or however it is titled).
There is a large amount of anger amongst many muslims nowadays as they perceive they are being attacked, which is understandable given the current climate.

Many of the muslim community however are appreciative of the fact - there are substantial benefits of living in the west - which i'm sure everyone will agree with.

I don’t know, perhaps it has always been this way, and only the fact we have the internet to see it for our selves just makes it seem like a recent development, I don’t know.
It probably is actually - the more we see, the more we know. The internet is great at letting people see.

What I do know is that there are three groups of folks in this world, those that are part of the solution, those that are part of the problem, and those that are not helping one way or the other.
That's definately true.

Today, Islam seems (if this site is any indication) to be made up, by and large, of the latter two groups.
Then I guess i'm in the minority group that is part or trying to be part of the solution.

Why is Islam fighting with Russia over Chechnya???? What does it have to do with any ancient Islamic land ownership?
Probably very little if anything at all - a trigger happy attitude seems common amongst certain muslims who keep using Islam as a way to do things - this is wrong. so very wrong. As a result, this thread has started.
That is the justification given for the Palestine’s isn’t it, that is also the justification given by some on this site in their support of Somalia’s threats to Ethiopia right now, isn’t it?
The sad thing is, the muslims that are "leading" are not the most level-headed/intelligent ones. This only makes my life more difficult - I already have to work twice as hard as everyone else (face it, if you ain't white in the UK, you gonna have to work extremely hard - it's a fact of life), and now these freaks cause trouble which means I have to work even harder - not enough people realise this.

As I have stated in a number of my posts, reform of Islam will have to be lead by Muslims, or, this will only get uglier and uglier, and many folks will suffer needlessly for it, both in the East as well as the West.
I and many muslims alike will agree with you on this. In fact, I often have this discussion with my brother

The East is, today, making the same sorry mistake as the West did over the last 50 or 60 years. The West supported many bad people like the Shaw<sp> of Iran, and Marcos, and Noriega, and any other number of other despots, just as long as they were willing to play ball.

If Saddam had been willing to play ball with the West, he would still be sitting pretty (that say’s many sad things about the West).
The truth both sucks and hurts.

For all of GWB’s faults (believe me, I am not a supporter of his), at least he has seen that parts of our/USA’s foreign policy has, for a long time now, been wrong headed. He has also faced up to the fact that the Bin Ladens of the world are not going away by them selves.

What I have came to understand about the Bin Ladens of the world is this, either quit breathing or convert.

I don’t freely choose to do either.
Ditto.

Until all the Bin Ladins are gone and those that support Bin Ladin, or refuse to help fight the Bin Ladins, and the West will not peacefully co-exist with the Middle East.
True, but that doesn't mean Islam and muslims can't coexist.

It is a shame that we spend some much time arguing, instead of trying to find common ground. But it is rather like what I was told on the “Comparative Religion” section when I tried to find common ground, “Anything that disagrees with Islam, WE disagree with”.
I too dislike that attitude. But the problem lies on both sides (this is not justification by the way, just saying :))

Aamirsaab, as an aside, two things that I have found amazing to me is this:

Jesus was opposed by the Jewish folks because of his contradictory teachings.
Islam is opposed to my understandings of Jesus’ teachings as well….. yet the Muslims on this site can’t even tell me what the teachings of Jesus were. Amazing.
lol, that's true. Not many muslims that I know do know all the teachings - but that's were we need to start learning - sadly, not enough want to learn.

The second thing I find amazing is this, the number of folks that post “I wish the whole world was ruled by Shira Law/Islam, yet when we look at how quick Islam descended into bickering after Muhammad’s passing……. Look at the thread “The last truly Islamic State?” and all the examples given…..sad….. just really sad.
lol, again, i've had the same conversation with my brother and the conclusion is the same: "it's a few bad apples spoiling the whole bunch"

Sorry about my post sort of being a scatter-gun approach Aamirsaab, it just seems that you may be a reasonable enough of a person for it to have been worth while.
Ah nothing to apologise for - I like trying to find common grounds with people and sometimes, scatter-gun approaches are the most effective way :).

Thanks
Nimrod
You're most welcome.

p.s; if there is anything that I haven't covered in this post, please feel free to ask and i'll do my best to answer.
 
Last edited:
Hi SearchingSoul
I was referring to Middle Eastern people being in the West. This in theory is fine but when they challenge Western practices it seems out of line.
:) :) :)
There is a manifest difference between calling for the west, as a political entity, to cease its manipulation of middle eastern politics, versus calling for the deportation of all middle eastern people from the west. The first is not racist while the latter is.

Regards
 
There is a manifest difference between calling for the west, as a political entity, to cease its manipulation of middle eastern politics, versus calling for the deportation of all middle eastern people from the west. The first is not racist while the latter is.

I am not calling for either. I think that simply stopping manipulation of Middle Eastern politics does not go far enough and I reject the claim that the West manipulates Middle East politics anyway. This is just paranoia. And I am not calling for the deportation of all Middle Eastern people. On the contrary, I think it is time to recognise that Christians have no future in the Middle East (or Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia) and they all should be given asylum if they want it. It is that I think convivencia does not work. I think this place shows it cannot work. Time to accept the inevitable logic of that.
 
HeiGou said:
I never asked - how did your exams go?
Pretty well actually - i'm predicted two C's and an A.

Well good luck!

HeiGou said:
As for the comment itself, well, I take your point. But really in the end your education and your finances are about you. Not about, say, me. If we can't co-exist, well, it wouldn't directly affect me. Of course you may grow up to be the guy who cures cancer. I assume you would have to do that in the West. But then the guy down the road may end up cutting my throat.
Ah but you see, the very fact that i'm here for the education means that I have been able to put my differences aside - if i hadn't, then i'd probably have moved by now. And just for the record, i'm hoping to work in the business section - so heck maybe you'll purchase from me in the not too distant future.

Sure but you have not put your differences aside because you like me, or us, or Britain as a whole, or appreciate the way of life or your rights or whatever. You're here for your personal gain and what you can get here that you can't get anywhere else. You're using us. OK. I can live with that. I may buy something from you in the future, but the guy down the road may still cut my throat. If there was, say, a mass population transfer with the Middle East, I would still be able to buy whatever I could have bought if you were here (but I'd buy it from an Egyptian Copt or an Israeli Jew), but it is unlikely that a Maronite would cut my throat.

I'm wondering if anyone else noted that these bombings only occured after 9/11. Perhaps, the connection lies there.

Perhaps. You will notice that not all things that change here change because the British vote for them.

HeiGou said:
I would not deny that but still suicide bombers in the West come from one community and one community alone. They may not represent that Faith community, but they do not originate in other Faith communities.
Valid point. However, sending all muslims back to the middle east wouldn't solve the problem - suicide bombings still occur in Iraq and Israel/Palestine. The solution to this problem is not as simple as you make it out to be - sure if you send all the muslims back to the middle east, the West won't get suicide bombed etc, but will it stop people like OBL (for example)?

It will solve my one of my problems in so far as fear of being blown up is a problem. If suicide bombings happen in the Middle East I don't mind much. It is wrong, but it is none of my business and if we're all getting out of the Middle East it won't be an issue for us to get involved in. This is the great thing about the fence around Gaza. It is unilateral. It does not require co-operation with Gazans and, let me stress, it works very effectively. There have been virtually no suicide bombings from Gaza. OBL may wish to blow up people in the West, but if he is on his side of the fence all he can do is blow up people in the Middle East. His co-operation is not required. Any other solution would require massive amounts of co-operation from Muslims and I do not see any evidence of that. How can we prevent every single Mosque being used to preach terror? How can we prevent young Muslims watching those stuff videos the radicals make? But we can build walls. Unilaterally.

Passing a problem onto someone else is all very easy and works in the short term. But it doesn't solve the problem as it is still there.

Maybe. I suspect that Muslims are better placed to deal with these issues. They are, after all, rarely the targets of suicide bombings. They tend to cross religious or sectarian lines. By and large Muslims do not care if Muslims torture and kill other Muslims. Only if the West does. I can't change the world, but I can work to change my corner of it.
 
I'm afraid not; Islam is a religion that provides guidance in political affairs, it is not a political entity that makes decisions, passes laws, invades countries, etc.

Well surely is it. Islam is, after all, a complete way of life isn't it? And you do have more than just guidance in political affairs, it is just that a lot of that is impossible to implement at the moment, isn't it? The Ummah exists as a legal concept wouldn't you agree? The Muslim community, as a whole, does make decisions and pass laws through the scholarship of the ulama. It does not, as yet, invade countries in a normal sense, but Muslims working as individuals on behalf of the Ummah, do. The Chechens did before the Second Chechen War which has got a lot of support around here. The Somalis, with even more support around here, are talking about doing it too. Clearly Islam is not quite a state-entity as the West thinks of it, but just as clearly it is not just a religion like Methodism. The fact that the original poster could define the two opposing concepts as "the West" and "Islam" is proof of that. How can the West get out of the lands of Islam if Islam is not political?
 
isnt it ironic how the minority makes life for the majority so hard! the terrorist, leaders which are the minority against the rest of the poulation, these cause teh diversities, or negative diversities, stereotypes etc. and the rest suffer due to thiis! i agree there is always a risk of getting on a bus being blown up or railway or whatever, however muslims are at the same risk! making the west seperate from the east or middleeast isnt going to calm things down however its gonna cause more diversities as psychologically more outgroup stereotypes occur when there si more seperation between groups! also what your asking is an ideoloy which isnt very practicle!
 
isnt it ironic how the minority makes life for the majority so hard! the terrorist, leaders which are the minority against the rest of the poulation, these cause teh diversities, or negative diversities, stereotypes etc. and the rest suffer due to thiis! i agree there is always a risk of getting on a bus being blown up or railway or whatever, however muslims are at the same risk! making the west seperate from the east or middleeast isnt going to calm things down however its gonna cause more diversities as psychologically more outgroup stereotypes occur when there si more seperation between groups! also what your asking is an ideoloy which isnt very practicle!

Why is that ironic? I don't think that Muslims are at the same risk. I think they are trying to kill me. I don't think they are trying to kill you. As long as you wear your hijab I think any potential bomber would probably get up and move to the next carriage. You can see the relative risks by the calm with which those leaders deal with terrorism. The kafir ones are active if not frantic. The Muslim ones are utterly relaxed.

It won't calm things down but it will take the problem from here and put it over there. No doubt there will be more hate, but it will be futile hate. I assume that Gazans hate Israelis a lot, perhaps even more than Palestinians on the West Bank, but because of the fence there is not a lot they can do about it. How else do you deal with hate? It is not very practical, but we can work on that too.
 
Why is that ironic? I don't think that Muslims are at the same risk. I think they are trying to kill me. I don't think they are trying to kill you. As long as you wear your hijab I think any potential bomber would probably get up and move to the next carriage. You can see the relative risks by the calm with which those leaders deal with terrorism. The kafir ones are active if not frantic. The Muslim ones are utterly relaxed.

It won't calm things down but it will take the problem from here and put it over there. No doubt there will be more hate, but it will be futile hate. I assume that Gazans hate Israelis a lot, perhaps even more than Palestinians on the West Bank, but because of the fence there is not a lot they can do about it. How else do you deal with hate? It is not very practical, but we can work on that too.

its ironic because a terrorist seeing me in a cabin wont think oh better not thats my sis! he probably think oh what the hell i'm getting blown she might aswell! no muslim has been enjying it since 9/11 you know! many muslims have died in these attacks, and are going to if they carry on!
why look at things so negatively aswell! i understand that your worried about being blown up, but its like worrying about being knocked over by a bus tomorro! why not get rid of hate, and i'm talking of myself here aswell, what do you think your going to achieve? seperating the muslims due to the few extremists, seperating the christians due to their extremeist, or is it just the muslims you want seperated?:?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top