therebbe
IB Veteran
- Messages
- 596
- Reaction score
- 75
You asked me to explain the Islamic perspective not to provide empirical evidence. Has that changed?
I was not sure if that was the Islamic prespective or just a statement.
Of course, but the explicit supposition is that they are fake. If they are not fake then there is no reason to reject them. That is why God gave us the faculties of reason and logic to investigate and search for the truth.
Good awsner. I completly accept that also. The only difference is that Judaism believes that Mohammad was a false prophet because he did not meet the requirements set by G-d, while Islam believes that he was the final prophet of G-d.
Yes, it is not true that someone who disbelieves in Prophet Muhammad and thinks he is false will go to paradise. If that was the case, why would the Prophet have bothered preaching at all?
Alright I understand where you are coming from now.
This is where Judaism and Islam seperate as we just ask people to be righteous and live good lives and accept G-d as there creator, while you proclaim the need to accept a prophet for the right to go to heaven.
If you are a righteous person, God will guide you to the truth. Why would God allow a righteous believing servant of His, who craves for the truth, to be mislead and come to reject God's Messenger?
Are you saying there are no righteous people on this earth that craved for the truth of G-d's message, and died a non-Muslim? I so, I would have to say that I utterly disagree with you. Now maybe your counter to this will be they were not given 'the message of Islam' properly, and that can probably be your only response because there were at least in my mind (I cannot speak for you) a lot of people who did not accept Mohammad as a prophet who lived righteous lives and craved G-d's true message.
Thank you for your time and your detailed responses.