Questions about the Bible/Christianity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ironbeard
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 100
  • Views Views 13K
Re: Christianity's God: Forgiving ... But How Just?

The only answer I have for you is to be more tolerant. I could provide the answers you seek but why? The point of posting this is not to seek answers but to bash anothers faith.

1) Thanks for the advice.

2) You're a psychiatrist?
 
Re: Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible

Nobody claimed the Bible is a book of science. The problems arises when there are discrepancies between science/history/archeology and Biblical accounts, an very good example being Noah's ark.

Read my post again:

This is such a joke. People who copy and paste are such losers. Think for yourself, and watch me refute your points. I can't take the bashing of others using lies:

Genesis 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
Genesis 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.

So... Are you saying God cannot make light without the sun? :rollseyes

Genesis 1:11-12, 26-27 Trees were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:4-9 Man was created before trees were created.

No, in Chapter 1:11-12:

11And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

It does not say every tree was created, God in Ch. 2 creates more trees.

G2:4-9

4These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
5And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
6But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
8And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
9And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

Genesis 1:20-21, 26-27 Birds were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:7, 19 Man was created before birds were created.

The passage says:

19And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.

It is saying that God out of the ground created them earlier and now is bringing them to Adam to be named.

Genesis 1:24-27 Animals were created before man was created.
Genesis 2:7, 19 Man was created before animals were created.

See above for the differences of Ch. 2 descriptions of events from before and then what happend.

Genesis 1:26-27 Man and woman were created at the same time.
Genesis 2:7, 21-22 Man was created first, woman sometime later.

Read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith#Lilith_as_Adam.27s_first_wife

Genesis 1:28 God encourages reproduction.
Leviticus 12:1-8 God requires purification rites following childbirth which, in effect, makes childbirth a sin. (Note: The period for purification following the birth of a daughter is twice that for a son.)

Encouragement, and the fact that it is a sin is unrelated.

Genesis 1:31 God was pleased with his creation.
Genesis 6:5-6 God was not pleased with his creation.
(Note: That God should be displeased is inconsistent with the concept of omniscience.)

He was pleased with Adam and Eve and the first creations, there offsprings are the sinners and therefore are the ones who he is unpleased with.

Genesis 2:4, 4:26, 12:8, 22:14-16, 26:25 God was already known as "the Lord" (Yahweh or Jehovah) much earlier than the time of Moses.
Exodus 6:2-3 God was first known as "the Lord" (Yahweh or Jehovah) at the time of the Egyptian Bondage, during the life of Moses.

The verses in question:


2 And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD:3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.

Your examples make no sense:

In Genesis 12:8 is says:

8 And he removed from thence unto a mountain on the east of Bethel, and pitched his tent, having Bethel on the west, and Hai on the east: and there he builded an altar unto the LORD, and called upon the name of the LORD.

Nowhere is he called Jehova. The name he calls upon is "God almighty" obviosuly.

Genesis 2:17 Adam was to die the very day that he ate the forbidden fruit.
Genesis 5:5 Adam lived 930 years.

No where does it say he will die the day he eats the fruit:

17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

You sho your lack of brain power because what it says is basically "when you eat this the day you do, you will surely die" as in YOU WILL DIE AT A POINT IN TIME.

Adam did die, because he ate from the tree. Many say Adam would not have died ever is he did not eat from it.

Genesis 2:15-17, 3:4-6 It is wrong to want to be able to tell good from evil.
Hebrews 5:13-14 It is immature to be unable to tell good from evil.

Can it not be both wrong and immature?

It can be dangerous and stupid to jump off a cliff... Is that a contradiction?

Genesis 4:4-5 God prefers Abel's offering and has no regard for Cain's.
2 Chronicles 19:7, Acts 10:34, Romans 2:11 God shows no partiality. He treats all alike.

God likes his offering better. He likes both of them equally. As you said he likes the OFFERING. Not the person.

Genesis 4:9 God asks Cain where his brother Abel is.
Proverbs 15:3, Jeremiah 16:17, 23:24-25, Hebrews 4:13 God is everywhere. He sees everything. Nothing is hidden from his view.

The point of asking is not because he does not know, it is because he wants Cain to admit his wrong doing.

Genesis 4:15, Deuteronomy 32:4, Isaiah 34:8 God is a vengeful god.
Exodus 15:3, Isaiah 42:13, Hebrews 12:29 God is a warrior. God is a consuming fire.
Exodus 20:5, 34:14, Deuteronomy 4:24, Exodus 5:9, 6:15, 29:20, 32:21 God is a jealous god.
Leviticus 26:7-8, Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Joshua 10:40, Judges 14:19, Ezekiel 9:5-7 The Spirit of God is (sometimes) murder and killing.
Numbers 25:3-4, Deuteronomy 6:15, 9:7-8, 29:20, 32:21, Psalms 7:11, 78:49, Jeremiah 4:8, 17:4, 32:30-31, Zephaniah 2:2 God is angry. His anger is sometimes fierce.
2 Samuel 22:7-8 (KJV) "I called to the Lord; ... he heard my voice; ... The earth trembled and quaked, ... because he was angry. Smoke came from his nostrils. Consuming fire came from his mouth, burning coals blazed out of it."
Ezekiel 6:12, Nahum 1:2, 6 God is jealous and furious. He reserves wrath for, and takes revenge on, his enemies. "...who can abide in the fierceness of his anger? His fury is poured out like fire, and rocks are thrown down by him."
2 Corinthians 13:11, 14, 1 John 4:8, 16 God is love.
Galatians 5:22-23 The fruit of the Spirit of God is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.

God is everything in Christian belief so God can be all those things.

Genesis 4:16 Cain went away (or out) from the presence of the Lord.
Jeremiah 23:23-24 A man cannot hide from God. God fills heaven and earth.

What stupidity, very simple... Cain went away and Lords presence was gone, not because he could not be found or was well hidden but because God had no concern for him.

Genesis 6:4 There were Nephilim (giants) before the Flood.
Genesis 7:21 All creatures other than Noah and his clan were annihilated by the Flood.
Numbers 13:33 There were Nephilim after the Flood.

The verse says:

33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

They were sons of Anak. Who were really big. Not Nephilim.

Genesis 6:6, Exodus 32:14, Numbers 14:20, 1 Samuel 15:35, 2 Samuel 24:16 God does change his mind.
Numbers 23:19-20, Isaiah 15:29, James 1:17 God does not change his mind.

Genesis 6:6 says: 6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

Exodus 32:14 says: 14 And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.

Numbers 23:17-19 shows God did not contradict. Balak did!


17 And when he came to him, behold, he stood by his burnt offering, and the princes of Moab with him. And Balak said unto him, What hath the LORD spoken?
18 And he took up his parable, and said, Rise up, Balak, and hear; hearken unto me, thou son of Zippor: 19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Genesis 6:19-22, 7:8-9, 7:14-16 Two of each kind are to be taken, and are taken, aboard Noah's Ark.
Genesis 7:2-5 Seven pairs of some kinds are to be taken (and are taken) aboard the Ark.

The verses refer to two of each to be taken and then another verse says 7 of a certian kind are to be.

For example, I say bring 2 pairs of shoes, and then say bring 5 more pairs of the first pair you brought.

God asks him to save more of a certain kind after ordering him to get some more. No contradiction, just God saying brin more of that. Thanks.

I often ask for a refill. :)

Genesis 7:1 Noah was righteous.
Job 1:1,8, 2:3 Job was righteous.
Luke 1:6 Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous.
James 5:16 Some men are righteous, (which makes their prayers effective).
1 John 3:6-9 Christians become righteous (or else they are not really Christians).
Romans 3:10, 3:23, 1 John 1:8-10 No one was or is righteous.

Romans 3:10 says: 10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

That means as he is writing there is not one righteous. That does not mean there was never righteous.

Genesis 7:7 Noah and his clan enter the Ark.
Genesis 7:13 They enter the Ark (again?).

The two quotes refer to before and after a huge amount of rain has come. sigh...

Genesis 11:7-9 God sows discord.
Proverbs 6:16-19 God hates anyone who sows discord.

So God can hate people who do something and still do it. God in Christian tradition is all powerful.

In Islam Allah hates other pretend God or "idols" yet Allah is a God. Therefore, he hates other humans things that emulate Allah.

Very simple. He can do it, but you can't.

Genesis 11:9 At Babel, the Lord confused the language of the whole world.
1 Corinthians 14:33 Paul says that God is not the author of confusion.

He is not the author the people brought it upon themselves and wrote there own fates by there actions.

Should I go on or not? Most of the New Testament says it is a New covanent of God so according to Christians the Old Testament laws do not matter, so they aren't contradictions but changes according to Christians.

Therefore, I will stop since I don;t have the time or energy to continue refuting your claims.

Please respond if you wish to mine, but since all you are usefull for is copy and pasting, i'm not sure you ahve the capacity to respond.
 
Re: Christianity's God: Forgiving ... But How Just?

You don't need one. Reading your post showed that your one goal was to discredit anothe religion, a belief system other care about. That is a pretty sad thing, I would never want to hurt another by attacking what they love.


I'm no Bible thumper, just somone who realizes peace will not occur when there is no understanding and just attacking.



if it wasn;t a copy and paste job then I offer you my apologies "Munda Pakistani"

1) Have thought about acting on your own advice?

2)Wow, never realised I wrote that well. :D Did you even read the post?
Anyway, no worries mate.
 
Those who say I copy and pasted, READ THE POST.

To tell you the truth, it looked like a "find anti-christian site and rephrase the bashing article in my own words" job, but maybe I am wrong.


Sh** Manchester, stop flooding the thread with insults. If you have patience use it, cuz there will always be copy and pasters.


He posted it after I already refuted him, so I wanted to show him that I answered him if he did not know or care to read.
 
I think the merging of threads has caused some confusion. For the record, my post about copy and pasting was directed at the copy and paste job by Iron beard, not Munda Pakistani.
 
hola Woodrow,

gracias for consolidating these thread i think it was a wise decision... if it is not too much trouble could i request that this thread be cleaned up a little bit though? i and a few others are trying to answers these questions and it will take a very long time because there are so many and they were asked all at once... this bickering about who is asking what and for what reason, or side conversations about how difficult it is to answer all 101 questions, or various other comments related to how it is not being done fast enough (and even this post) are only adding to the clutter which means some of our posts, answering these questions, are being lost or never seen...

i do not have very much time in the day to answer some of these very important questions... so i do try to put a lot of concentration in them and it is depressing that they are being lost amid the pointless scuffles...

gracias
Dios te bendiga
 
Last edited:
Re: Christianity's God: Forgiving ... But How Just?

In another thread, someone (a Christian) said that Muslims don't fully appreciate God's mercy and forgiveness. That got me thinking.

Correct me if I'm wrong anywhere below; I'm no scholar. :)
Greetings, Munda Pakistani

I am having a relaxed day today, and I am not really in the mood for some serious Bible search.

I will offer just a few thoughts, and hope that others may contribute more scholarly advice ... :)

But looking at it from another angle, isn't God, along with being extremely Merciful, Absolutely Fair and Just? I'm pretty sure that's what Christianity preaches.

How is it fair that someone who's raped and murdered all his life, can say and believe in a couple of sentences, and end up in the same heaven as the nun who's abstained from many of the world's pleasures throughout her life? Does the nun not deserve to be rewarded for her devoutness? Although it seems all warm and nice and forgiving if you look at it from the murderer's point of view, but it's very unfair if you look at it from the nun's point of view.
[...]
Extending that, if someone rapes my daughter, and escapes punishment in this world, is it fair that he should get away scot-free in the Hereafter as well and end up in the same Heaven as me just by saying and believing in a few sentences? Again, looking at it from the rapists point of view, it's all warm and fuzzy, but from my point of view, it's extremely unjust.
Of course we believe that God is just - but that does not mean 'just' and 'fair' in the eyes of men.

God allows many things to happen (famine, war and disasters for one thing), which, from a human perspective a may consider 'unfair'! Why was I born into a rich developed nation, receiving daily provisions and more, good housing, schooling etc ... when others are born to live short impoverished lives, only to die of hunger???
As believers we cannot think like that. If God is just, then he is just ... even if we fail to understand it with our human minds.

With regards to people receiving God's grace despite having led a sinful life, does Islam not teach similarly? As soon as you dedicate you life to Allah, your past sins are wiped out?

Jesus said this (Sorry, it' a bit long, but I don't think I can shorten it without losing some of the meaning ...):
The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard
"For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire men to work in his vineyard. He agreed to pay them a denarius for the day and sent them into his vineyard.

"About the third hour he went out and saw others standing in the marketplace doing nothing. He told them, 'You also go and work in my vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.' So they went.

"He went out again about the sixth hour and the ninth hour and did the same thing. About the eleventh hour he went out and found still others standing around. He asked them, 'Why have you been standing here all day long doing nothing?'

" 'Because no one has hired us,' they answered.
"He said to them, 'You also go and work in my vineyard.'

"When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his foreman, 'Call the workers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last ones hired and going on to the first.'

"The workers who were hired about the eleventh hour came and each received a denarius. So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. 'These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said, 'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.'

"But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?'

"So the last will be first, and the first will be last."
(Matthew 20:1-16)
Whoever dedicates his life to the Lord, received the full reward - regardless at what stage of his life this occurs.
Is this so different in Islam?

The Qur'an clearly speaks about levels of heaven (in Surah Waqiah (number 55), for instance). The more good deeds you perform in this world, the higher the heaven you gain entry to. This to me seems to be the just way.

Does the Bible speak about, directly or indirectly, levels of heaven? If not, how do you solve the above conundrum?
To my knowledge there are no different levels of heaven ...

But good deeds do matter very much in Christianity!
Look here:
"It isn’t enough just to have faith. Faith that doesn’t show itself by good deeds is not faith at all—it is dead and useless. Now someone may argue, 'Some people have faith; others have good deeds.' I say, 'I can’t see your faith if you don’t have good deeds, but I will show you my faith through my good deeds'” (James 2:17-18).
You may find this thread interesting:
http://www.islamicboard.com/comparative-religion/32408-faith-vs-works.html?highlight=deeds+faith

Islam, like Christianity, teaches that Allah is Extremely Merciful and Forgiving. Yet, Islam also teaches that inspite of this, if I wrong someone, I will not be forgiven until and unless that person forgives me. Again, to me, this seems to me to be the just way.
That highlighted sentence is interesting!
Does Islam teach that? I haven't heard that before ... thank you for sharing it here. :)

Christians are meant to forgive others their sins, but God's forgiveness does not depend on people forgiving a sin first ... instead God only forgives us when we are prepared to forgive others.
Jesus said this:
Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. (Luke 6:36)

Sorry for the long post. :)
No worries, brother ... my post is longer than yours! :D

Peace
 
You wish for me to give you the answer then very well, you wrote:

How is it fair that someone who's raped and murdered all his life, can say and believe in a couple of sentences, and end up in the same heaven as the nun who's abstained from many of the world's pleasures throughout her life?

I would like to point you towards your own beliefs if I may:

Hadith Qudsi 34:
On the authority of Anas (may Allah be pleased with him), who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (sal Allaahu alayhi waSalam) say: Allah the Almighty said:

O son of Adam, so long as you call upon Me and ask of Me, I shall forgive you for what you have done, and I shall not mind. O son of Adam, were your sins to reach the clouds of the sky and were you then to ask forgiveness of Me, I would forgive you. O son of Adam, were you to come to Me with sins nearly as great as the earth and were you then to face Me, ascribing no partner to Me, I would bring you forgiveness nearly as great at it.

Pretty easy, ask and get forgived, what about the devout believers?

Your religion is the same...
 
Good idea. I will begin work on it. A number of the questions are essentialy duplicates, so I will start with those.

If I erroneously delete an important post please let me know and I will restore it.
 
Good idea. I will begin work on it. A number of the questions are essentialy duplicates, so I will start with those.

If I erroneously delete an important post please let me know and I will restore it.


gracias Woodrow,

please just do not delete any of the 100 questions (many are redundant) or any of my direct answers to them (even where i point out it is redundant) i would like ironbeard to have the opportunity to explain if he meant something else by his question than how i understood he meant it... i am going to index links to all 100 of my answers when i am done so i need all 100 posts intact...

i have been online too much today i should go now, goodnight everybody!

mucho gracias
 
I am quite sure that Munda Pakistani's original post was not a copy-and-paste job.
His quote
In another thread, someone (a Christian) said that Muslims don't fully appreciate God's mercy and forgiveness. That got me thinking.
seems to refer to my quote in the 'Why not Islam' thread:
But with all the beauty and wisdom I see in Islam, I believe that it misses the true nature of God. It does neither recognise nor understand the expression of God's love for us in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. That's a terrible loss to all who follow Islam, because God's grace and love for us is so much greater than Muslims realise!
It could be a coincidence, of course, but it looks genuine to me ...

Peace, guys ... this thread seems to be escalating! :rollseyes
 
I am quite sure that Munda Pakistani's original post was not a copy-and-paste job.
His quote
seems to refer to my quote in the 'Why not Islam' thread:

It could be a coincidence, of course, but it looks genuine to me ...

Peace, guys ... this thread seems to be escalating! :rollseyes

Yeah I realised which is why I finally answered and apologized through PM.
 
i have been online too much today i should go now, goodnight everybody!

buenos noches Jayda!
Maybe rest of us could help you on your "quest". Like write answer to some and pm them to you? Then you could decide whether to use them or not? just thinking aloud...
 
4. Out of all the signs that Jesus could have given about himself, he chose to give the sign of Jonah: This generation is an evil generation; it seeks a sign but no sign shall be given to it except the sign of Jonah. (Luke 11:29, Matthew 12:39, Matthew 16) Jonah was swallowed alive by a whale and remained in its belly alive for three days. For Jesus to have properly fulfilled the prophecy, he would need to enter the tomb alive and come out alive. Why should Jesus give this, of all signs, if he was to die and be resurrected?

hola ironbeard,

these are the passages you identified:

"As the crowds were increasing, He began to say, "This generation is a wicked generation; it seeks for a sign, and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah." (Luke 11:29)

"But He answered and said to them, "An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet;" (Matthew 12:39)


And here is a link to Matthew 16 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew 16;&version=49;


The answer to your question comes to us from Matthew 12: 40

"for just as JONAH WAS THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS IN THE BELLY OF THE SEA MONSTER, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

Jesus actually explains what he means by "the sign of Jonah," he is not directly saying that what happened to Jonah will happen to Him, (otherwise he would have been eaten by a whale), His sign is that He will be buried in the heart of the Earth for three days and three nights... which He was.


okay so here is your question again:

4. Out of all the signs that Jesus could have given about himself, he chose to give the sign of Jonah: This generation is an evil generation; it seeks a sign but no sign shall be given to it except the sign of Jonah. (Luke 11:29, Matthew 12:39, Matthew 16) Jonah was swallowed alive by a whale and remained in its belly alive for three days. For Jesus to have properly fulfilled the prophecy, he would need to enter the tomb alive and come out alive. Why should Jesus give this, of all signs, if he was to die and be resurrected?

Jesus did not mean that what literally happened to Jonah would literally happen to Him, he was saying that just like JOnah was in a whale for 3 days, He would be buried in the Heart of the Earth for three days... that is the only likeness to Jonah's situation that he promises.

gracias
 
Last edited:
5. If Jesus's message was for the whole of mankind, why did he forbid his disciples to preach to the Gentiles? (Matthew 10:5-6)

hola ironbeard,

please see my answer to question number 3... you are asking the same question, so it is the same answer.

gracias
 
6. When Jesus was asked what the only way was to true salvation, he replied: keep the Commandments (Matthew 19:17). The first of the Commandments was to believe in the Oneness of God (Exodus 20:3). Why did Jesus answer so if he believed in and was part of the Trinity? Why did he not refer to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

hola ironbeard,

the two passages that you quoted are

"And He said to him, "Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is g(Q)ood; but if you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.""(Matthew 19:17)

and

"You shall have no other gods before Me." (Exodus 20: 3)

your question mixes two different subjects and confuses what the rich man is asking...

the two subjects are the christological nature of God, and our relationship with God.

"Theologia" (the nature of God) is a subject that addresses questions like "what does God look like" "how is Jesus' divinity manifested?" "how is Jesus both Man and God?" essentially these questions are aimed at telling us about what God is as a physical/spiritual being. There is no one place in the Bible that addresses theologia, but instead it is spread out in the Bible (and usually connected to some other oikonomic context) and must be organized to give us any coherent picture about God, the over arching picture is that we will never fully understand God as a spiritual or physical being, He is too complicated and we will only know the things He wants us to know, and that is very little... this is why most of our doctrines that organize coherently the revelations we have concerning Gods essence are called "Mysteries" like "the Mystery of the Trinity."

"Oikonomia" (our relationship with God) is the second subject... this is what the purpose of the Bible is, it covers things like Gods intervention in the course of human development, Gods plan for us, Gods covenants with mankind, Gods laws mankind must obey, and other things related to the interaction between man and God. this is something fully revealed to us... because it is the purpose of revelation. Sacred scriptures are inherently Oikonomic.

returning to your question the man was asking Jesus an oikonomic question. "And someone came to Him and said, "Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain (B)eternal life?"" (Matthew 19: 16). The Ten Commandments are also an Oikonomic event, God explains His reasons for telling them the commandments in Exodus 19:

You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings, and brought you to Myself.

Now then, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own possession among all the peoples, for all the earth is Mine;

and you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.' These are the words that you shall speak to the sons of Israel."

Here God saysnthat He is giving them these Commandments to be a part of His covenant... the purpose of the commandments is not to know about His nature (theologia), but to know what is expected of them (oikonomia).

it is the same oikonomic scenario for both the man in the NT and the Israelites in the OT... and so it is the same oikonomic answer. "Do this," a theologic explanation on the nature of God was neither required nor appropriate for either case... although when God speaks about Himself obviously He means Himself in all His theological attributes, which includes things known, such as His Triune Oneness, All powerfulness, Omniscience et cetera... and things unknown/unrevealed.

so here is your question

6. When Jesus was asked what the only way was to true salvation, he replied: keep the Commandments (Matthew 19:17). The first of the Commandments was to believe in the Oneness of God (Exodus 20:3). Why did Jesus answer so if he believed in and was part of the Trinity? Why did he not refer to the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

and the answer is that you are confusing two separate topics... it was an oikonomic question a theologic answer was not appropriate... it is simply assumed in Gods oikonomic answer (in both Exodus and NT) He is talking about The God, with all His theologic attributes.

gracias
 
buenos noches Jayda!
Maybe rest of us could help you on your "quest". Like write answer to some and pm them to you? Then you could decide whether to use them or not? just thinking aloud...

Mucho gracias!

please if you wish to answer feel free to, no need to send it to me, i am not any kind of authority!

honestly i do not know very much about other denominations... i am just answering as completely as i can for what I know about Catholicism (i am Catholic)... i am only using four resources, the New American Standard Bible, which is our only English translation approved for liturgical use by the Vatican, the Catholic Catechism which explains almost all matters doctrinal and dogmatic, the Catholic Encyclopedia which has wonderful encyclopedic knowledge that is considered imprimatur, and some personal resources... my family is very good friends with our Cardinal so sometimes i ask him but most of the time i just call a monastary :)

most of these questions are very easy some are a little redundant and many are based on misunderstandings or errors in interpretation (from a Catholic standpoint)... they are not difficult... i think ironbeard can learn a lot if we answer these for him...

i think right now i am on 7? but feel free to answer any you choose! i would like to index them with one post in the end so he can see our answers easier and ask any more questions he may have...

Dios te bendiga!
 
7...and how many to go? You must realize that ironbeard isn't actually interested in your answers. Perhaps I'm being negative, but I would hate to see someone spend so much time and effort to answer these questions when it will only lead to the same thread a week or two from now. I'm giving you reps for the effort however.
 
7...and how many to go? You must realize that ironbeard isn't actually interested in your answers. Perhaps I'm being negative, but I would hate to see someone spend so much time and effort to answer these questions when it will only lead to the same thread a week or two from now. I'm giving you reps for the effort however.

Gracias...

94 if you include question 7. i think if ironbeard and the muslims that said they are good questions were interested in the questions than they must be interested in our answers too...
 
Extending that, if someone rapes my daughter, and escapes punishment in this world, is it fair that he should get away scot-free in the Hereafter as well and end up in the same Heaven as me just by saying and believing in a few sentences? Again, looking at it from the rapists point of view, it's all warm and fuzzy, but from my point of view, it's extremely unjust.

Islam, like Christianity, teaches that Allah is Extremely Merciful and Forgiving. Yet, Islam also teaches that inspite of this, if I wrong someone, I will not be forgiven until and unless that person forgives me. Again, to me, this seems to me to be the just way.

Isn't is unfair that people are given blanket forgiveness for the wrongs they've done to other people?

How does one become a Muslim? What happens to a persons past sins when one "reverts"?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top