Maybe. That would seem a reasonable solution.
Do you think those members of the PKK that currently live rather autonomously in Iraqi-Kurdistan and are crossing the border to commit acts of terrorism in their pursuit of a larger independent Kurdistan consisting of territory from Turkey too, would be willing to change their position and settle for that? How do you get them to see the wisdom in that?
Well it isn't as bad as having Greece demanding control of Syria, Turkey, Cyprus, and all other lands that were once controlled by Greece.
I mean let's face it, if Kurdistan is made, and there are those here that will fight to destroy it (like Israel). Then what about other countries that lost their territory as well like Persia, Greece (as the Byzantine Empire), Italy (as the Roman Empire), Germany (under the Nazi Regime), Turkey (as the Ottoman Empire), Russia (as the Soviet Union), France (as the French Empire under Napoleon), Britain (as the British Empire), Spain (as the Spanish Empire), Denmark (as the Scandinavian Empire, which controlled most of Northern Europe), Saudi Arabia (under the Caliphate), Mongolia (under the Mongolian Empire established by the ruthless Gengis Khan), United States (when it had direct and open control over Germany, Japan, Mexico, Phillipines, and practically the entire pacific ocean), Mexico (when it had control over Texas, California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Guatemala), Japan (when it had control over most of the Pacific and the Coastal areas around the Pacific), and Serbia (when it was once Yugoslavia).
Besides, why should an area highly dominated by Kurdish people be under the rule of a foreign entity. It is like having the Egyptians still under the rule of the British Government. Do you want that to happen again?
Or what if the United States hadn't acted into WWII against Germany? What do you think would have happened to the muslim communities? You'd wouldn't even exist, because your parents or grandparents would have been killed half of a century ago. But what I am saying is that you shouldn't so easily target against segregation and the formation of new countries. There is no logic in it, unless they supported slavery or some other practice that you could reasonably dispise. Like for instance, Zionism is the continual removal of non-Jews from the Canaan region and the growwing expansion of Israel territory. So it is reasonable to dislike Israel since it harbors Zionism. But Kurdistan doesn't seek to remove anyone or ban Islam. A great majority of Kurds are muslim, therefore why whould they spread such a practice?
I say let Kurdistan be and perhaps in the future we can see a more united Middle East, once people stop trying to attack one another or limit the freedom one group of people can express.
