czgibson
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 3,234
- Reaction score
- 481
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Atheism
Greetings,
To be quite frank I think that Satan is a fictional character. He's also not mentioned in the argument I thought we were discussing.
You yourself admitted you didn't know what music I was talking about; therefore, you don't have a particularly wide knowledge of music. As for the article we're discussing, the author shows no indication of knowing anything about music.
Evidence for this bold assertion?!
Are you interested in having a rational debate here, or are you just going to make baseless generalisations?
Selflessly? It's their job! Continuing to do what they do helps to consolidate their position of authority.
Also, is it not Allah that has supposedly made music haram?
That's precisely why I think faith can be so dangeous. Someone who believes they are right, even though they have no real reasons to support their view, is capable of anything.
They've tried to justify a ruling after the fact, and as I've been trying to show, their justifications are based on ignorance and paranoia - little more.
Thank you for that rather colourful analogy, although I'm not sure how it fits in here...
What has led you to this view? The gap between rich and poor is substantial now, but nothing like as wide as it was, say, 600 years ago.
What is inflammatory about them? If you believe the arguments given by the article we're discussing, you are being conned - it's as simple as that.
Don't just believe whatever you're told simply because the person telling you is in a position of authority - think for yourself.
Peace
you think satan is a muslim?? no he is a non-muslim and so are those that follow him.
To be quite frank I think that Satan is a fictional character. He's also not mentioned in the argument I thought we were discussing.
Don't be so presumptuous, He lives in UK where the Music BHOOM is, im sure he knows what he is talking about.
You yourself admitted you didn't know what music I was talking about; therefore, you don't have a particularly wide knowledge of music. As for the article we're discussing, the author shows no indication of knowing anything about music.
try to understand that prevention is better then cure. with all the technological advancements the
state of humanity as a whole is still deteriorting. Thee are more crimes and deseases then ever before.
Evidence for this bold assertion?!
Gun crimes, teen pregnancies, drugs & alcahol abuse and disorderly behaviour is a common trend with the youths these days
and they all have one thing in common...yes you guessed it! there love for music, apparently its a their single most
big influence, that and eastenders round where i live anyways
Are you interested in having a rational debate here, or are you just going to make baseless generalisations?
As far as I know only the duff was allowed is allowed. The prominent scholars who are far more knowledgable of Islam
have selflessly undertook rigirous studies in order to guide mankind have made the ruling that Music is Haram.
Selflessly? It's their job! Continuing to do what they do helps to consolidate their position of authority.
Also, is it not Allah that has supposedly made music haram?
but you have to keep an open mind to this, as Allah(SWT) made laws for the whole of mankind based on their limits, abilities to do things,
with the knowledge of the unseen and infinite wisdom. We accept his judgements knwoing we cannot fathom his reasoning and ration, onyl knowing that he knows whats best for us even though we cannot fathom how, its called FAITH.
That's precisely why I think faith can be so dangeous. Someone who believes they are right, even though they have no real reasons to support their view, is capable of anything.
The best of mankind Mohammad(SAW) didn't do it nor his companions and the PROMINENT scholars upon studying the Qur'an and sunnah have some to the
conclusion that it's because it leads to Unlawful thoughts/actions.
They've tried to justify a ruling after the fact, and as I've been trying to show, their justifications are based on ignorance and paranoia - little more.
But where there is doubt one should leave it. WOuld you eat a sandwhich which has rat-droppings around it only to suffer the consequences if it did later? I think not... well at least I hope so.
Thank you for that rather colourful analogy, although I'm not sure how it fits in here...
Technological advncements maybe but bought prosperity? I THINK NOT :rant:
What has led you to this view? The gap between rich and poor is substantial now, but nothing like as wide as it was, say, 600 years ago.
Well atleast you tried to keep those inflammatory remarks to yourself till the end eh?![]()
What is inflammatory about them? If you believe the arguments given by the article we're discussing, you are being conned - it's as simple as that.
Don't just believe whatever you're told simply because the person telling you is in a position of authority - think for yourself.
Peace