I see where you're going with this
Subhanallah.
He is only practising what he preaches as he says: "I put more credit on non-self serving sources".
I wander where he takes his proofs for agnosticism.
I see where you're going with this
Subhanallah.
Read my signature. :skeleton:He is only practising what he preaches as he says: "I put more credit on non-self serving sources".
I wander where he takes his proofs for agnosticism.
I think there also needs to be an understanding that what the Qu'ran says and what is actually being done or has been done in physical reality are two different things.
I looked at the "Golden Era of Islaam". It truly was a Golden Era for Islaam. It was truly better to be a Christian under Islam than be a Muslim under Christianity. If fact, for many, it was better to be a Christian under Muslims than be a Christian under Christians.
But that by no means it was GOOD to be under Muslims. At least by todays standards.
For you there is belief. Me, I prefer facts.Even by todays standards it is good to be under Islamic Shari'a, since Allaah has sent the guidance to His final Messenger, Muhammad (peace be upon him) which is suitable and flawless until the Day of Ressurection.
Regards.
Read my signature. :skeleton:
I think there also needs to be an understanding that what the Qu'ran says and what is actually being done or has been done in physical reality are two different things.
I looked at the "Golden Era of Islaam". It truly was a Golden Era for Islaam. It was truly better to be a Christian under Islam than be a Muslim under Christianity. If fact, for many, it was better to be a Christian under Muslims than be a Christian under Christians.
But that by no means it was GOOD to be under Muslims. At least by todays standards.
For you there is belief. Me, I prefer facts.
I guess that is why you are a confirmed theist and I’m a confirmed agnostic.
One, "Not bad dear", does not make all deals good. :skeleton:If it was this bad why did the christians of Jerusalem ask the brits to give them as rights the treaty they had with Umar ibn Al-Khatab?! Read the history.
One, "Not bad dear", does not make all deals good. :skeleton:
There are many cases where Muslims were not as bad as Christians. During that time, I would probably prefer the inferior status Islam would give me. That does not mean that I prefer an inferior status.It is funny that you complain about muslims that will give you the opportunity to pay Jizyah while the Jews and the Christians will not allow this commodity.
There are many cases where Muslims were not as bad as Christians. During that time, I would probably prefer the inferior status Islam would give me. That does not mean that I prefer an inferior status.
But I surely understand the human desire to be considered superior.
It truth there is nothing superior to equality.
There is no equality in Islam. :skeleton:This is why we encourage non-muslims to become muslims.
There is no equality in Islam. :skeleton:
That was one of the reasons for the tax. Ya, don't forget the tax, after all that is what this thread is about. :thumbs_up
There goes that different but equal. :? Back in the 60's it was called "Separate but Equal". :raging: Same concept.Do not forget that the dhimis would be exempt from zakat also and yet benefit from the public funds. So there are different situations for different people. That is where the equality comes. Just like non-muslims do not pay zakat, muslims do not pay jizyah.:thumbs_up
There goes that different but equal. :? Back in the 60's it was called "Separate but Equal". :raging: Same concept.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.