Yes, I agree that Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) claim to Divine revelation is "equal in nature" to that of "Prophet" Paul. Our faith depends on who we choose to believe.I DO understand that. And in my opinion, the inspiration that Paul received from the Holy Spirit in writing his letters IS equal in nature to Gabriel speaking aloud to Muhammad, inclusive of the annual rehearsal. I wrote as I believe and worded it as I intended.
A distinction between Muslims, Christians, and Jews is that:
1) Muslims accept both Jesus and Muhammad (pbut) as prophets of the One God, but they outright reject Paul and the other NT authors as legitimate prophets with Divine revelations.
2) Christians accept Jesus (pbuh) as the only begotten Son of God and at the same time God, Paul and the other NT authors are accepted as de facto prophets with Divine revelation from God/Jesus, but they outright reject Muhammad (pbuh).
3) Jews reject Jesus as Son of God while Jesus, NT authors and Muhammad are rejected as prophets with Divine revelation. They are held as no more than ordinary men, or something less.
Do others see it different than I do?