i see, many of you have a problem with God not showing himself or speaking to you.
Unless you can demonstrate otherwise, there’s no verifiable evidence that any god(s) has ever spoken to anyone. If you believe god has spoken to you, that’s fine (I’m taking a step backward and watching where your hands are). Science really only embraces viable theories; otherwise, it would have to consider every claim no matter how outlandish. If you need one example, does the science of psychiatry need to step back and not make any conclusions about the clichéd lunatic who believes he is Napoleon, and that Kaiser Wilhelm is stealing his socks on a nightly basis? Do we have to sit back and wait until "tools are developed to assess the possibility that Napoleon and Kaiser Wilhelm reincarnate" (and the Kaiser has a sock fetish) or do we conclude the patient is delusional?
It's the curious
lack of evidence that is what makes the various claims of god(s) all so suspicious. It's the repetitive nature of other, earlier messiah myths that gives one pause to ask, "Is this an original event? If so, why so many similarities to earlier "events" we know are prosaic mythology?" Why the odd timing of the "resurrection" to be at a time of the year already well known and saturated with previous religious beliefs of rebirth, so much so that to this day the name of "Easter" is a descendant of the word "Oestre" (Ishtar)? Why bring into the world your primary messiah in a land rife with messiahs-of-the-week?
No wonder theres this new phenomenon of born again christians and the spirit coming within subhanAllaah.
Born again Christians are certainly not a new or even recent phenomenon.
Now i understand where it comes from, this yearning, shaytaan abuses your minds.
The arguments of creationists are not driven by evidence that can be observed in the natural world. Special creation, Shaytans, Jinn, etc., or other supernatural intervention is not subjectable to meaningful tests, which require predicting plausible results and then checking these results through observation and experimentation. Indeed, claims of "special creation" and other supernatural interventions reverse the scientific process. The explanation is seen as unalterable, and evidence is sought only to support a particular conclusion by whatever means possible.
Allaah can send messages however he likes, if you dislike it, its you that shall answer for rejecting the truth.
It’s a bit disingenuous to claim that allah has sent any message of truth.
Certainly every religion, believing itself the arbiter of what is "god-given" takes on the mantle of this authority. While I will say for the record that religious belief served a purpose in human history, for the most part there are better models that serve human requirements for these things, and they do it in terms of the common good as opposed to an external authority commanding us on pain or threat of punishment to do the things that are morally justified. As time goes on, these wholly secular paradigms will grow larger and more potent, and religion will fade (and yes, there will be many false starts and huge errors).
.
