A review of baseless assertions

Sorry for not being clear; let me explain what I meant:

You believe in god.
You believe god can perform miracles.
You believe ('on the basis of logic and evidence') that the Qur'an was written by god, and is therefore true.
The Qur'an contains descriptions of miracles.
You believe they happened because
You believe in god and
You believe god can perform miracles.

That reasoning seems to be circular. Have I understood you correctly?

I can't speak in other persons places, but personally I believe the othe rway around, it would go something like this:

I recognise the Qur'an as being devine.
Therefor I Believe both in the existance of the mentioned God as well as in his capability of performing miracles. Because the Qur'an is a miracle by itself and it contains miracles within it and it mentions other miracles that happens in the past (I only put in that third one to stress that those miracles weren't the ones the first two are refering to).
But, that's only the "logical reasoning" part. My biggest source of faith is still my feeling not my logic, the two just go well together. Like I've repeatedly said on this forum, on the end of the day, personal expierience goes a long way.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top