Atheism

Is there evidence for the existence of God?


  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do not know. When I meet one I'll let you know.
:sl:
He is a Sabian.

There is no detectable end to the universe
That's because the universe has at least five dimensions to it. To us, it seems that there is no end, but if you kept travelling in the same direction, you would reach the place where you set off from. In other words, there is no edge.
:w:
 
Last edited:
:sl:
He is a Sabian.


That's because the universe has at least five dimensions to it. To us, it seems that there is no end, but if you kept travelling in the same direction, you would reach the place where you set off from. In other words, there is no edge.
:w:

Glad you said there are at least 5 Dimensions. More then one physicist has suggested the probable existence of many more. Now your statement is true, yet at the same time false. That assumes that the fabric of the space, matter, time continuum is a sphere with an infinite radius. True a projection can be made that traveling from one point will graphically return to the originating point. But, it would be an infinite distance and would take an infinite period of time to complete the circumvention of the sphere. We have a sphere that is describale, but has no physical limitations.

By it's very nature it is impossible to prove that the universe is infinite, as infinity can not be measured.

Perhaps, It would be better if I had said that there are no measuremente that prove the universe has limits. However, even that would not be considered that the universe is infinite, it merely means we have not developed technology to measure it fully. the other problem is even if we were to come up with an accurate method of measuring the extremes of the universe from point A to point B, the question will be what happens if I step past point B
 
like can God create a stone He can't lift?

:sl: :sister:
Be at ease sister. None of the questions they can come up with have not been asked and answered already through the logic of strict Tawheed. The answer to that question for example is. Allah (SWT) can do whatsoever Allah wills if it pleases Him, and it is not for us to question Allah's motives or attribute to him anything that has not been revealed through one of his messengers. They are the sort of questions children ask and it is a sign that their knowledge is incomplete, so it is up to us to help them.

:brother:
 
Allah (SWT) can hold infinity between His eyes, between his thumb and forefinger or between anything else Allah (SWT) so wills. This paradox is completely explainable by simple mathematics. Numbers can go on for infinity from 1 in a plus or minus direction, yet between 1 and Zero there are just as infinite number of fractions as there are between 1 and 2 or 1 and infinity.
Subahanallah.
:brother:
 
Glad you said there are at least 5 Dimensions. More then one physicist has suggested the probable existence of many more. Now your statement is true, yet at the same time false. That assumes that the fabric of the space, matter, time continuum is a sphere with an infinite radius. True a projection can be made that traveling from one point will graphically return to the originating point. But, it would be an infinite distance and would take an infinite period of time to complete the circumvention of the sphere. We have a sphere that is describale, but has no physical limitations.

By it's very nature it is impossible to prove that the universe is infinite, as infinity can not be measured.

Perhaps, It would be better if I had said that there are no measuremente that prove the universe has limits. However, even that would not be considered that the universe is infinite, it merely means we have not developed technology to measure it fully. the other problem is even if we were to come up with an accurate method of measuring the extremes of the universe from point A to point B, the question will be what happens if I step past point B
:sl:
there are ways of measuring the radius of the universe. You simply measure how much gravity is in the universe, which can tell you how curved it is. We know that the universe is almost flat, with a slight positive curve. We also know that the universe has no edge. If you extend any curved line, the two ends will eventually meet.
:w:
 
Perhaps, It would be better if I had said that there are no measuremente that prove the universe has limits. However, even that would not be considered that the universe is infinite

Are you not confusing the universe with space?

it merely means we have not developed technology to measure it fully. the other problem is even if we were to come up with an accurate method of measuring the extremes of the universe from point A to point B, the question will be what happens if I step past point B

You would extend the distance between point A and point B?
 
Are you not confusing the universe with space?

Space is not very clearly defined. In essence it means everything that is not within the earths atmosphere.


You would extend the distance between point A and point B?

True, but we had already defined the extremes of the Universe as A to B, to accept the concept that B can be extended denotes acceptance that the Universe is infinite.
 
Oops :rollseyes sorry Bro Woodrow, that was actually for Root, I thought his succinct response was quite witty.

What he meant was that it could only be expressed as a formula, so there would be no specific values, hence the equation would be unaffected. he is speaking in algebra, but it does make sense. As does your comment, which is seeking to be more empirical, but when we start talking about the kind of infinite figures needed to discuss this, empiricism becomes rather a moot point.

:brother:
 
Space is not very clearly defined. In essence it means everything that is not within the earths atmosphere.

I find space best described as the void between two atoms?

First of all let's look at something of infinate value closer to home that has no beginning and has no end but of immense value to us. This is simply "numbers". Yet, if I say the distance between me and my local shop is 135 metres you understand precisely what I mean. If our universe is 16 billion years old then it's distance between two points are 16 Billion Light Years apart!

If you was to take an imagenary journey to the very edge of the universe what would you see. Of course you would not hit a brick wall, the universe has no physical boundary or border. You will see "nothing", (no light & no matter) just darkness. but what is this "nothing".

Who created the "nothing" that the universe is expanding into? Another way of what I am trying to describe. Assume God created the universe, did god also create the "nothing" that the universe expands into. This is also a regressive question because who created the nothing that the nothing that the nothing that the nothing etc etc expanded into.

Does "nothing" exist? I for one say yes logically "nothing" must in a human sense exist. So finally, "nothing" is "nothing" otherwise described as "matterless space" and like numbers it is infinate, the universe is not.
 
but what is this "nothing".
Who created the "nothing" that the universe is expanding into?

Seems to me that you are well on your way to finding God. That is where I started at least. I thought to myself, well I suppose that is just "it which is", then I found the ancient Hebrew way of saying those three words and absolute peace entered my being.

I find space best described as the void between two atoms?

Me 2. There is infinite space between them, and I find that mind-blowingly beautiful.

There is a difference between your supposition and my own way back. Mine was based upon this string of 5 concepts

no thing can not exist

Whereas you seem to have jumped (unless you have not illustrated the fullness of your calculations) to the paradoxical answer to that fact that we can not deny that space does exist, i.e. nothing really is. At least by this I mean I correct me if I am wrong, that although we can not touch it (or maybe that is all we can do?) or see it, we know that it is there. And from here we can start to finally understand all of those deep and meaningful statements of the prophets and messengers which people stand in awe at without actually grasping the immense beauty and truth of it all. So my eyes are wet typing this.

Are you sure you are an Atheist? Because you speak like a dry-eyed sabi. All you need is to let go with your emmotions and feel it flow. I had a friend in Pakistan who was a dry-eyed sabi, I don't know what her psychological history was, but whenever she tried to let go she started to get so physically shaken to pieces that she would stop. She went to Shrinks and took medication because she was so afraid of this emmotion. Then she decided to study psychology and she realised that there was nothing to fear but fear itself. She stopped the medication, and after a few weeks took a deep breath and boom. I am jealous of the ammount of love she has, it is immeasurable really. I don't know what it is about true dry-eyed sabi`een that allows them to experience so easily when it happens that which the rest of us wet-eyed sabi`een spend our whole lives seeking. Their tears are on the outside too when they pray, while to my regret mine are usually only on the inside.

God Bless you.

:brother:
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by root
but what is this "nothing".
Who created the "nothing" that the universe is expanding into?

Sabi - Seems to me that you are well on your way to finding God. That is where I started at least. I thought to myself, well I suppose that is just "it which is", then I found the ancient Hebrew way of saying those three words and absolute peace entered my being.

The fact remains that I am very happy in the knowledge nobody created "nothing".

Quote:
Originally Posted by root
I find space best described as the void between two atoms?


Sabi - Me 2. There is infinite space between them, and I find that mind-blowingly beautiful.

Quite.

There is a difference between your supposition and my own way back. Mine was based upon this string of 5 concepts

no thing can not exist

Whereas you seem to have jumped (unless you have not illustrated the fullness of your calculations) to the paradoxical answer to that fact that we can not deny that space does exist, i.e. nothing really is. At least by this I mean I correct me if I am wrong, that although we can not touch it (or maybe that is all we can do?) or see it, we know that it is there.

I need some hash! (shame I stopped several years ago). I agree that we cannot truly observe nothing directly or indirectly, It does not exist. Unless you want to call me a lier when I say I am holding nothing in the palm of my hand. You also just described nothing as "it" creating in your or my mind a physical entity which is probably the point that our agreement parts. I accept nothing as being nothing, you seem contrary to that opinion.

And from here we can start to finally understand all of those deep and meaningful statements of the prophets and messengers which people stand in awe at without actually grasping the immense beauty and truth of it all. So my eyes are wet typing this.

Seems you have had quite an emotional stimuli and since I notice your next paragraph refers to Pakistan I am going off topic since I spent quite some time in Krach, pakistan. On my final day I spent time with new friends made who I had spent so much time with. I spent the day with some pakistani military officers, some wealthy Pakistani individuals smoking dope drinking beer and eating, a big passtime in Pakisan. I remember going to the beach and standing on a wall as the vey warm air gushed by my body off the arabian sea. Quite an endorfine packed experience which brought a tear to my eye. Finally, my Pakistani friend "Jimi" asked what my opinion was of him and his country. I said in all honesty "It seems pakistan and the UK have lost touch for the great historical events between the two have been confided to the history books and that is a great shame. I came here thinking terrorists and badlands, I leave with great friends and much respect for pakistan".

Jimmy, came to the British consulate with me and he would never allow me to pay for anything. I said to him in the consulate "you are now on British soil, you no longer pay for me and I return your hospitality". I duly took him to the bar and got him drunk ;D A picture of the Queen was on the wall and he said "look the Queen", and I nodded in agreement. He then went on to describe how the picture of the queen was on the wall in his home when he was a child. which to me only reinforced the great historical links pakistan and the British have, it's not all bad as some here would make us believe.

I have strayed - so shall get back on topic.

Are you sure you are an Atheist? Because you speak like a dry-eyed sabi. All you need is to let go with your emmotions and feel it flow. I had a friend in Pakistan who was a dry-eyed sabi, I don't know what her psychological history was, but whenever she tried to let go she started to get so physically shaken to pieces that she would stop. She went to Shrinks and took medication because she was so afraid of this emmotion. Then she decided to study psychology and she realised that there was nothing to fear but fear itself. She stopped the medication, and after a few weeks took a deep breath and boom. I am jealous of the ammount of love she has, it is immeasurable really. I don't know what it is about true dry-eyed sabi`een that allows them to experience so easily when it happens that which the rest of us wet-eyed sabi`een spend our whole lives seeking. Their tears are on the outside too when they pray, while to my regret mine are usually only on the inside.

I don't consider myself an atheist, it's a label other people give me because I reject the human religous explanation of God. I am here quite by chance and everything I observe around me also is. I disregard the antropic notionthat the laws of physics themselves are a carefully tuned put-up-job calculated to bring humanity eventually into existence, I reject this notion every bit as much as history playing a scriptured theatrical play whose purpose was pre destined to have a world order that we currently observe. It is no accident that we see stars in our sky at night and this does not imply that stars exist in order that we could have existed. It's just without stars their would be no atoms heavier than lithium in the periadic table and a chemistry of just three elements is too impoverished to support life. Seeing is the kind of activity that can go on only in a kind of universe where what you see is stars!

God Bless you.

Thankyou, such people as yourself bring hope peace and understanding amongst people. I have much respect for you brother!

a Selfish Gene once said:

Bodies of plenty I have seen
you think your so clever
but I will live forever
your just a survival machine.
 
Last edited:
So you are a Sabi, just a naughty one :okay:

The fact remains that I am very happy in the knowledge nobody created "nothing".

Exactly! it is uncreated. The only difference really is that I call it... er... well... I suppose that is the difference, I referred to it as.... oops.... there I go again. How can I talk about it... tut, and again... well without saying IT? Space, Nothing, Hyperspace, The Swiss Cheese, The Matrix, all of these are just words, labels, names. We might as well choose one for it (tut sorry, there I go again). I just think it (oi vey) is such a beautiful fact (how's that one?) that only the most beautiful names will do. But if you find beauty in the word "Nothing" then perhaps that is your own private and special "wahy" (revelation). As a name it makes me quake at my own fragility in the face of it, so I suppose I can find beauty in the phrase "The Nothing", but since it is indivisible (it really is an indivisible singularity) I suppose that the presence of the definite article really does not matter that much but it just sounds nicer to my ears. It is difficult for me at least baring this Tawheed in mind to understand then some people calling themselves Sufis when they think they can be one with it, without complete and total self annihilation? What do you think?

Thankyou, such people as yourself bring hope peace and understanding amongst people. I have much respect for you brother!

Jizakallah khair brother, but it really is not me, it is the emmotion I have surrendered to. And thank you so much for tollerating my own choice of words instead of condemning them, I do hope you will be able to explain us to others like yourself. A bridge comes from two sides remember, so there would be no coming together were it not for you too. Its great to be a Human isn't it? I mean I am sure a slug has some kind of feelings too, but it really is wonderful that our reasoning can lead to such a complex flood of beautiful emmotion.

Salaam Brother.



P.S. I think its more catchy this way :P

There once was a selfish old Gene
who said "Bodies-a-plenty I've seen,
you think your so clever
but I'll live forever
your just a survival machine."
 
Last edited:
Exactly! it is uncreated. The only difference really is that I call it... er... well... I suppose that is the difference, I referred to it as.... oops.... there I go again. How can I talk about it... tut, and again... well without saying IT? Space, Nothing, Hyperspace, The Swiss Cheese, The Matrix, all of these are just words, labels, names. We might as well choose one for it (tut sorry, there I go again). I just think it (oi vey) is such a beautiful fact (how's that one?) that only the most beautiful names will do. But if you find beauty in the word "Nothing" then perhaps that is your own private and special "wahy" (revelation). As a name it makes me quake at my own fragility in the face of it,

An uncreated entity, now that must be the mother of all paradoxical thought.

so I suppose I can find beauty in the phrase "The Nothing", but since it is indivisible (it really is an indivisible singularity) I suppose that the presence of the definite article really does not matter that much but it just sounds nicer to my ears.

It's neither visible nor unvisible. I think your identification of a singularity is agreeable though if only in result but not by descriptive means.

it is difficult for me at least baring this Tawheed in mind to understand then some people calling themselves Sufis when they think they can be one with it, without complete and total self annihilation? What do you think?

Not sure entirely what you mean here. However, I don't consider "nothing" as being spritual, and as I said I am very comfortable with an uncreated infinately small/large non-entity that is "nothing".
 
Not sure entirely what you mean here. However, I don't consider "nothing" as being spritual, and as I said I am very comfortable with an uncreated infinately small/large non-entity that is "nothing".
So what would you do Root if you found out that this inexplainable 'nothing' was created by God
 
So what would you do Root if you found out that this inexplainable 'nothing' was created by God

I would look to what "God" was? considering the question I am just about to ask you.

Can I ask you, given the same scenario. If the creation was a simulation run by alien supreme beings, would you accept them as "God"? and why not if you choose no.
 
Alien supreme beings? You're not a ralien are you? (or however you spell that)
 
It wasn't aimed at me though, and I thought it would be rude to answer for her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top