I don't choose my beliefs based on what I want to believe. I may want to believe that I am young and handsome, but I know otherwise. I choose my beliefs based on what I consider most likely to be true. That is my only criteria.
Different people can seek truth with equal honesty and come to different conclusions. This is simply the result of the fact that different people think differently.
I agree with you about celibacy. God (and evolution) said to be fruitful and multiply. Celibacy violates this. So I agree to cross off my list those religions that support celibacy.
On the other hand, I see no evidence in support of the Day of Judgement. This is actually my biggest problem with the Quran (because it stresses this idea). All of the ideas in the Old Testament have external evidence supporting them from science or history. The Day of Judgement has no such supporting evidence. But note that I am agnostic on this question in the sense that there is no evidence against the idea of a Day of Judgement either.
Islam may not be easy, but I think my religion is harder. It is very hard to follow a religion that almost no one else follows. The path of least resistance would be to give in to some popular religion like Islam and then gain wide acceptance for myself through this. But I don't take the path of least resistance. Instead, I always seek truth no matter how lonely the path there may be.
Again, read the parts that i made
bold. You say in the first bold part that you don't choose what you want to believe, yet you say what i consider most likely to be the truth. Truth is not based on what you find it most likely to be the truth, truth is clear from falsehood. Truth is already shown without you giving your opinion. Truth is based on objectivity.
Another question that you may want to ponder about is, how come of all the religions i choose Islam? When investigating honesty, you come to a believe that is based on objective evidence. For example atheist, they BELIEVE in evolution theory because they base their believe on factual evidence. However the critical thinker, doesn't look what has been found, but he also would look what has NOT been found. This is the typical evolution theory of that they tend to talk only about the findings, but never about what has not been found. So it is a believe based on factual evidence in combination with HOPING that the missing link will be found one day. Also they are not found of talking about things that science hasn't proven yet, being for example "missing link" and "what came before the big bang" as this question for example is hard to answer.
In my case, Muslims CLAIM that they have some evidence that confirms of a Creator. What is this evidence? They CLAIM it is the Qur'an. In their claim also, is that this book does not contain any errors. So if we would follow the road of logic, rationality and reason would bring us to a simple question.
Primary question: Does this book indeed not contain any errors?
If we based on this question branch things out, we have to keep certain factors in mind before going and investigating the primary question.
Factors:
- Muslims claim that this Creator of theirs is PERFECT. Perfect in what sense? That He knows everything, that he makes NO mistakes and that He has Creator everything. So if somebody indeed has created something, then that certain individual KNOWS exactly how that certain creation works to the detail if asked about.
- Human beings are faulty so IMPERFECT.
- Human beings are BOUND to make mistakes as their nature is imperfect. They are limited in all sort of things.
- A translation of the Qur'an is made by human beings, so by DEFAULT it will contain errors. So the ORIGINAL one should be investigated not a translation. As Muslims claims the ORIGINAL is perfect.
We have now created a little foundation to start from and made a scope for the research.
One can take all kind of approaches, but lets look a the SCIENTIFIC FACTS that will not even change over 100 years. You look what has been talked about in the Qur'an and you compare it with scientific facts of today that have been branded 100% true. You look if the Qur'an goes against it or not? If Qur'an says something that is NOT according to this scientific facts, then by default it is false and has been made by human beings. As human beings are imperfect and thus make errors.
You can take all kind of scientific categories and compare them if they have been talked about...be it, human psychology, astronomy, biology, etc. etc. etc.
So to make things a bit easier for other readers as well. If one would investigate 100 things that have been talked about. If 99 are correct and 1 is false, by default Qur'an has been made by human beings. If 100 things out of 100 are correct, then by DEFAULT the Qur'an has NOT been made by Human Beings but by somebody else.
So to do this research if you truly
do not trust anybody, one MUST learn Arabic language to very advance level. So you know what you are reading. If somebody says i "don't" have time, then by default you are wrong and Qur'an is right, as you are not accepting it is the truth, but even more scarier, you do NOT follow the scientific approach of analyzing it. You rather follow your own desires. When one would die because he or she automatically would have branded the Qur'an as false without investigating it and there IS a Day of Judgement. That individual has NO argument to say why he or she did not follow Islam. So that individual is by default a loser based on his or her own desires.
I have also heard this question. Well if it would be from the Creator, then why did he not make it in all the languages? Have you ever thought about it, that there are all kind of people? Some will not follow it whatsoever and some will follow the truth by whatever means. So having it especially made in a foreign language, people who truly show honesty and are in pursuit of finding the truth, they will sacrifice this life for it. We have a brain, so nothing can stop us to learn a knew language.
So the conclusion of the primary question, would give you two possible outcomes.
- It contains errors thus it has been made by humans. FULL STOP!! and thus false.
- It does NOT contain errors, thus it has NOT been made by humans. Who has made it then? That is another question and another research.
This same procedure NEEDS to be done with ALL the scriptures, if you truly are a individual who is searching for the truth.
"
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart." Qur'an 17:81
As you can see, i have NOT used any of what I WANT it to be. Just PURE logic, rationality and reason. If you still disagree with maybe i have something wrong in this comment, do please correct me. However if you disagree with the method, this shows to you that you are not really searching for the OBJECTIVE truth. You are searching for SUBJECTIVE truth. In that case, i wish you a good life my friend.
Peace