Norway is involved in the Afghanistan war, clearly supporting the US foreign policy.
Maybe in Afghanistan they do, but then Afghanistan was harboring a group accused of attacking the US. Hardly an internal affair.
You say:
The only time I can see where a country should be allowed to get involved in another countries' internal affairs is when there is mass murder of a particular group
Then you say:
Yes because it will affect other countries national interests.the Israeli/Palestinian do allow for external action.
This is a contradiction as I see it. Is the criteria murder or affecting national interest?
And if you are saying that awarding prizes or voicing opinions is not getting involved in another countries internal affairs then why did you respond like this in a previous post:
I think some western countries should not get involved in other countries internal affairs.but does anyone here actually support China in this? Or does everyone simply look upon it as spitting in the face of the West, therefore something to be applauded, or at the least condoned?
You are obviously equating the giving of Nobel Prize with getting involved in a countries internal affairs, and then later deny that it is.
It seems you are scatter shooting with no clear aim here.