Did Jesus Christ Claim Divinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter _ALI_
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 81
  • Views Views 11K
Actually, the Injeel was not written by any disciple. The Injeel was a Book of Revelation sent down to Jesus (pbuh); the Gospels we have today are not a corrupt version of the Book. They are written as accounts on Jesus' life and message. According to the rejected Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus received his own scripture from his Lord.

The Injeel is no longer existent. Christians will argue that this is so because it never did exist notwithstanding that thousands of their books have been discarded, as they were not in agreement with their newfound creed. Anyway, that is the truth about the Injeel.

:sl:

I stand corrected then akhi.. thank you

Baraka Allah feek

:w:
 
There is some truth to what the atheist fellow said..

there are however 5 books not four..
scrolls (suhuf) of Abraham (PBUH), zabur of David, tawrat of Moses, Injeel of Jesus, and the Quran... Quran is the criterion of what preceeded...
peace

i assume the zabur of david has also been lost, yes?
 
i assume the zabur of david has also been lost, yes?

...only the parts that don't agree with what is already accepted...

Yep, they're all lost. the Suhuf, Zabur, Tawrat, Injil.... You really can't trust those Jews with anything right?


Nevermind that the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad, and yes there were slightly different versions in the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Hi everyone,

I think the main problem is to know what Jesus actually did say before stating whether he said x.y.z.

i know that the present 4 gospels are not considered the original. but the term injil refers to them, and not the entire new testament? (mostly paul anyway, i believe).

The term would be speaking about what was given to Jesus, not neccesarily what Mark/Matthew/Luke/John say was given to Jesus. So for example snake, the Qur'an is what was given to Muhammad, but this, i.e. Qur'an, has been transmitted by all Muslims down throughout the ages, so, if we look at a book by a companion of Muhammad, the companion may say 'x.y.z and this is proved in the Qur'an....' now, the portion of Qur'anic quote is what the Qur'an is, the rest is different. Similarly, the Gospels have something like that, you have Jesus speaking, and then you have the authors writing. So for example:

17After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18"Are you so dull?" he asked. "Don't you see that nothing that enters a man from the outside can make him 'unclean'? 19For it doesn't go into his heart but into his stomach, and then out of his body." (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods "clean.")​

From Mark 7, what you note here is, Jesus' apparent speech, 'Are you so dull..' etc, then the author telling the story, i.e. 'after he had..' and then the author's interpretation 'In saying this , JEsus declared..'.

What may have been part of the Injeel is the direct speech/action (derived from a comman in the injeel) of Jesus. So only that would be up for scrutanisation. Now, if you look at some scholar's of the Bible's writings, they will tell you there were three stages, stage I: The actions and words of the real Jesus. Stage II: The oral traditions from such actions, so these actions were transmitted, sometimes correctly sometimes not so. Stage III: The taking of the tradition and shaping it to form a gospel. In trying to find the real actions/sayings of Jesus one has to try work back.


What I would say is that there may be some stage I stuff in the Gospels, but there are also other stages.

Injeel is none of the current four gospels, some contend that the original injeel was either written by the only disciple who actually hung around Jesus 'barnabas' .. some think it is a fake, whatever the case, we don't actually know who luke/mark/mat etc actually are, thus their books are actually very questionable according to Islam.. the original Injeel should be free from error as it is divinly inspired..(clearely not the case with any of the versions or the re-defined versions of what is now widely accepted)

peace


Pretty much that sister, some parts of Jesus' message may have been written or may not, some may have been written but re-interpreted in a different way, God knows best.


Actually, the Injeel was not written by any disciple.

As Salam Alaykum,

How do you know that akhi?

...only the parts that don't agree with what is already accepted...

Yep, they're all lost. the Suhuf, Zabur, Tawrat, Injil.... You really can't trust those Jews with anything right?

Well maybe not all, I mean if you understand the complexity behind the compilation of the text you'll appriciate the difficulty in knowing what is what.

Nevermind that the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad, and yes there were slightly different versions in the beginning.

Well although you seem to have a different view on how I understand the textual history of the Qur'an to have been. The Qur'an stands not only on texual witness, rather, one also should look at the method of memorising, the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, is a really smart man for inspiring so many of his followers, through rewards, to memorise the whole qur'an, to 'come up' with making them recite it 5 times a day at least, and make the teachers of the Qur'an the best, I mean, if you ask me that's a great way to go in making sure a message isn't lost.

On top of that, one only has to note the social differences.

And God knows best.
 
i assume the zabur of david has also been lost, yes?

I am not sure.. I have read some Psalms when I went to catholic school, and some of them were very sexual, almost bordering upon pornographic.. I don't believe that, that is the style of divinity... but some were ok.. so I am not sure, I am the wrong person to come to on this particular subject matter. Perhaps one of our brothers/sisters who have converted can shed better light? :)


peace
 
Br Ansar Al'Adl has touched upon the subject of the collection and compilation of the Quran http://www.islamicboard.com/refutat...tered-yaa-ayyuhaal-kafiroon-6.html#post787918
as to leave very little room for speculations on behalf of atheists. unless of course they want to dispense out opinions rather than facts-- which is in fact what we have become accustomed to here...

Be that as it may, I also recommend this book
Front_Cover_Thumbnail.jpeg




ISBN: 1872531652
Author: Muhammad Mustafa al-Azami
Publisher: UK Islamic Academy (2003)
Pages: 376 Binding: Paperback
 
The Revised Standard Version, Illustrated, says in the back, where it lists the books of the Bible, under authorship for Psalms:

Principally David, though there are other writers.

Under settering:

The 150 Psalms were col-lected into a hymnal for use in the Second Temple. Likely written over a span of 1,000 years or more.

EDIT: Yes, that book is pretty nice, may Allah reward the brother, it also contains a small section in the back focusing on OT and NT. Though obviously not as detailed as the main part.
 
...only the parts that don't agree with what is already accepted...

Yep, they're all lost. the Suhuf, Zabur, Tawrat, Injil.... You really can't trust those Jews with anything right?

you may want to read Richard Elliott Friedman's: Who Wrote The Bible?; and for further evidence try: The Interpreter's One-Volume Commentary on the Bible edited by Charles M. Laymon and put out by Abington, now in it's 15th printing


Nevermind that the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad, and yes there were slightly different versions in the beginning.

Peace be upon those who follow the guidance,

here's the problem with claims that "the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad[pbuh]", and it's a fundamental one, are you ready for it?

AS LONG AS THE Messenger of Allah[Salla Allahu Alayhe Wa Salaam] WAS ALIVE, REVELATION WAS COMING DOWN! YOU COULDN'T COMPLETE IT IN WRITING UNTIL IT WAS DONE BEING REVEALED!!!!!!!

simple, eh?

if you were writing a biography of someone who was alive, it would be out of date the second that you finished it. it would need to be "revised" every so often. the same holds true with " there were slightly different versions in the beginning", OF COURSE THERE WOULD BE! whatever "version" someone had would be "outdated" as soon as the next revelation!

again, simple, eh?

if you still don't comprehend, just ask away!

:w:
 
Peace be upon those who follow the guidance,

here's the problem with claims that "the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad[pbuh]", and it's a fundamental one, are you ready for it?

AS LONG AS THE Messenger of Allah[Salla Allahu Alayhe Wa Salaam] WAS ALIVE, REVELATION WAS COMING DOWN! YOU COULDN'T COMPLETE IT IN WRITING UNTIL IT WAS DONE BEING REVEALED!!!!!!!

simple, eh?

if you were writing a biography of someone who was alive, it would be out of date the second that you finished it. it would need to be "revised" every so often. the same holds true with " there were slightly different versions in the beginning", OF COURSE THERE WOULD BE! whatever "version" someone had would be "outdated" as soon as the next revelation!

again, simple, eh?

if you still don't comprehend, just ask away!

:w:

THE BEST AND GREATEST ANSWER I've EVER SEEN!

Jazakallahkhair brother!
 
Last edited:
Peace be upon those who follow the guidance,

here's the problem with claims that "the Qu'ran in it's current form was compiled after the death of Mohammad[pbuh]", and it's a fundamental one, are you ready for it?

AS LONG AS THE Messenger of Allah[Salla Allahu Alayhe Wa Salaam] WAS ALIVE, REVELATION WAS COMING DOWN! YOU COULDN'T COMPLETE IT IN WRITING UNTIL IT WAS DONE BEING REVEALED!!!!!!!

simple, eh?

Surely god knew the precise moment when Muhammad would die and would leave enough time for him to finalize the message, compile it, have it read out to him in it's totality for it's approval. Then maybe he would have a few more days just to make sure enough copies were made.

The Qu'ran is not a biography of the Muhammad, any more than it is a biography of Noah.

The Qu'ran is taken to be a revelation to all mankind. Truly, there are ethical problems that mankind faces today that we do not have a prescription for in the holy book. Do you think it is out of date?


THE BEST AND GREATEST ANSWER I've EVER SEEN!

Jazakallahkhair brother!


So you mean to say that the prophet's lifetime was not enough to reveal everything, or that god could not have forseen his death? So either muhammad's life was long enough simply for the revelation (if you assume it was complete) and not it's propogation, or long enough only for the propogation of a core message and it was possible that there would be further revelations.

This is what you seem to be saying.
 
Last edited:
Surely god knew the precise moment when Muhammad would die and would leave enough time for him to finalize the message, compile it, have it read out to him in it's totality for it's approval. Then maybe he would have a few more days just to make sure enough copies were made.
Allah (swt) knows all... His message is complete in the Quran, therefore he did leave enough time to finalize his message.. This is why the final prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had those who followed him, just as Jesus (pbuh) had those who followed him and finalized his message and teachings after he was crucified, according to Christian belief.

The Qu'ran is not a biography of the Muhammad, any more than it is a biography of Noah.
The Sunnah is the biography of the prophet Muhammad (pbuh), the Quran is the message of Allah (swt)
The Qu'ran is taken to be a revelation to all mankind. Truly, there are ethical problems that mankind faces today that we do not have a prescription for in the holy book. Do you think it is out of date?

Please elaborate on the ethical problems that the Quran does not have an answer for... I can already tell you before you state them, that more than likely you will have a more liberal point of view, since you are a self proclaimed atheist. Where you may think something is backwards or to strict, I will tell you that you and I, and much of the world have veered away from what is good to better suit our needs, rather than Allahs.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was written down on sheep bones and the like as the revalations came up?

The Qur'an may have been written in totality, I think it was off the top of my head, but what is reffered to normally is the Qur'an being compiled into a book.

So yes, people were asked to write by the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, but it was only after his demise which the Qur'an was put inbetween covers, if i am not mistaken.

And Allah knows best.
 
The Qur'an may have been written in totality, I think it was off the top of my head, but what is reffered to normally is the Qur'an being compiled into a book.

So yes, people were asked to write by the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, but it was only after his demise which the Qur'an was put inbetween covers, if i am not mistaken.

And Allah knows best.

I think it was the third Caliph who assembled it

but am not sure:blind:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top