Discussion with a Christian about the Crucifixion

Greetings and peace be with you cheese, maybe if I can just reply to one of your points, in a way it highlights how I see my faith.

I believe that God always does things in a greatest good way, which is slightly different from saying God can do anything. So if you take a quality like love, then God would be the greatest source of love.

Can God love us more than he loves himself?

Or could the words of the greatest commandments possibly be used to describe God’s love.

God loves all that he is; with all his heart, soul, mind and strength?
God loves each and every one of us as he loves himself?

I have reflected on these words for the last seven years, and they seem to carry an awesome power. But they are purely thoughts, I have had no conscious revelations to say there is any truth in these words.

In the spirit of searching for God

Eric
 
Greetings and peace be with you snakelegs;

I have often found your replies to be very thoughtful and I would be interested to hear your broader interpretation of God and religion.


1 Thessalonians. 3:12
May the Lord be generous in increasing your love and make you love one another and the whole human race as much as we love you.


Eric
 
So, what everything comes down to, is this Kenosis theory. It would seem that if a person accepted this theory then everything else comes naturally. Therefore, I think it would be useless to discuss anythign other than this theory.

From what I have understood so far, God is one but is composed of three: the father, the son and the spirit. Now, christian belief is that God, in the form of the son, came down to earth as Jesus and had to be offered as a sacrifice for the sins of mankind because there is no sacrifice big enough to do the job, other than God. While in this form- Jesus was human though still divine, and therefore acted as anyother human would too.

Now here is what bothers me. If God is everything that we believe him to be- the all-knowing, the all-seeing, the all-hearing, the wise, the patient, the almighty, can he possible go from being perfect to being imperfect? A human?

Being Almighty means to have unlimited power, right? It represents an ability. God can do anything. This is where yet another paradox comes up- if God can do anything, surely it is within his power to 'transform' himself to a state (i.e. human), in which he is no longer the almighty? He can do anything, so therefore He can make Himself human. But then, once He is human, He no longer exhibits those characteristics that are exclusive to God- i.e. all knowing, almighty, etc.

The solution to this paradox is that when when we say God is almighty, we are refering to an ability. But then to say that since He is almighty, it must be within His power to become human and 'give up' some of his awesome traits for an amount of time, during which he is no longer almighty and is falable as any other human is- this is not refering to an ability an longer, it is refering to both and ability AND disability.

To break it down: the 'ability' aspect comes in when one considers whether God can do something or not. So to ask 'Can God do so and so?' is refering to an ability. But when that so and so is actually itself an inability, the question breaks down into something meaningless because it goes against the very nature of God. The inability in this case is the idea that God can be a human.

To reinforce what I mean by the above, consider this example: "If God can do anything, can He create a rock so heavy which He Himself can not carry?"

Again, this line of thinking is based on the idea of ability/inability. The ability is in the part of the question that says 'can God...', and the inability is in the idea of the rock. Such a rock cannot even exist in the first place (not to mention that he only thing that makes the rock heavy is gravity and that God is not bound by gravity in the first place lol).

Okay... i hope that made sense. The point of all that was (incase you missed it lol) was: Can the almighty really 'transform' into a being that is not almighty? (No, of course He cant)

Though I finally posted on this a couple of days ago, I have some new thoughts, or should I say questions, that this part of your post had me mulling over, Cheese. I hope you enjoy making me think, because you do. :D





OK, it might sound like a dumb question, but I'm really curious what others think about this. So the question is...

If God were to flip a coin, would it be possible for Him, an omniscient, omnipotent God, to completely remove all influence on the outcome of the flip? Could He flip a coin and then sit back and let it fall with a random outcome?

One notion would say that if God is doing the flipping, then He must influence (and know) the outcome before the coin even leaves His hand... meaning that it would be impossible for Him to relinquish control in order to generate a "random" outcome.

On the other side of the coin, one could say that an all-knowing, all-powerful God could somehow intentionally relinquish control over an object and let it come to rest with no influence from Him. If you believe this one, does it diminish God's omnipotence in any way?



(How do we make these questions relate to the official topic of this thread? I don't know. I'm not omniscient. But somehow, I'm sure they do. :) )
 
Indeed I did. Sorry to take so long to get back to it.:embarrass

Me too. :D I've taken a while to get back to it also, been a bit busy.

Well, as I read what you have written (and other posts from the Muslim brothers and sisters) I can see that we also have a different understanding of the nature of sin. We basically agree as to what sins are, but we view how they impact us differently. For Christians they are much more than just wrong acts. In the way that Islam talks about the whole of life being one of Islam or not, so to the Christian views one's relationship with God. But the bigger problem is not with the individual details of what one does or does not do, but in the attitude from which those actions spring. As the Crucifixion is a way of dealing with sin, we need to be sure that we mean the same thing when we use this term. For the Christian it is more than just Haraam (though that is bad enough), the real problem is a sin nature that lies deep within each person's heart. This very nature has to be changed.

Ok lets see if I get you here. When we say someone is doing haram, it means they are doing something God prohibited, therefore disobeying Him. To disobey him is a sin. I assume it would be the same in christianity.

I'm not sure what you mean exactly by saying the 'attitude from which those actions spring', if you mean intentions, know that in Islam actions are judged by there intentions.

In regards to this nature of sin that mentioned, in Islam we believe that humans have in-built tendency to sin. This is how God has created us. In fact we are told that if we were perfect with regards to sinning (i.e. we never sinned) then God would have no use for us. Sinning is something that all people will do not matter what. This isnt something that can be changed. You cant make a person perfect, they will always sin. The objective is to reduce the amount of sinning a person does, and if a person does sin then they must turn to God in sincere repentence, and if they are granted forgiveness then they become like the person who never sinned in the first place.

Yes. Interjecting an anology -- often you may see Christians use a triangle as sort of a representation of this. A triangle has three sides, but it is just one triangle. And it is only completely a triangle when talking about all of the sides together, yet if one lives in the plane of the triangle, one can only see one side of the triangle at a time. So one might speak of side A, side B, or side C. But the reality is that each side is just one view of the triangle which is always a whole.

Yes I've read many such analogies, however I do find most of them to be rather shallow. I mean, it works nice for a triangle but not really for God. One side of a triangle can live independently of the other and change its identity to become a simple straight line. Can each part of God also go its own way? :?
I am not willing to admit that humans, when they are what God created them to be, are imperfect. I will readily admit that I am imperfect. I will admit that I have known no perfect people. But I believe that when God created Adam and Eve that God paused at the end of his acts of creation, "God saw all that he had made, and it was very good" (Genesis 1:31). This even though we know that there is none God except God alone. Yet that we were very good is God's own opinion of us (and all creation). I believe that is because at the time of creation we were in fact perfect.

Perhaps you need to define perfect? It is part of Islamic belief that only God is perfect. Being 'very good' falls very short of being perfect. And the fact that Adam and Eve did sin later on indicates that they always had the capicity to sin, so why are they perfect upon being created but imperfect upon being exposed to 'real life'? Being perfect would mean that they would have had the perfect response to the devil when he tempted them to sin.
It was as a result of the fall, when sin entered through disobedience, that we became imperfect. Christians believe that Jesus was born without this sin in his life. Thus, he was a perfect of a human being as were Adam and Eve. Only, unlike them, he lived a life of perfect obedience. So, there is no corruption for Jesus to be the perfect God in an imperfect human body, because he was in a perfect human body.

Muslims believe all humans are born without sin. There is no such thing as inheriting the sins of others in Islam, that would be an injustice.

i would also like to suggest that no, Jesus was not perfect or sinless, not even by the christian vesion of event. Upin death he said something like "Oh God, why have you forsaken me?" To say such is a big sin in Islam, a very big sin, to question God's wisdom and to show a lack of patience towards his decree. Had he been 'perfect' he would have known better than to question God's will. You will find in Islamic history many such cases where people were faced with very terrible situations as bad as crucifiction, and yet they never disobeyed God as such.

For example, one of the Muslims (a companion of the prophet pbuh) was captured by the enemy as a prisoner of war. Note that he wasnt even a prophet (let alone a God in the form of a human). The enemy wished to weaken him and they told him that if he doesnt give up Islam they will kill hom, but he didnt give up his faith. And then they got another Muslim prisoner and, in front of the companion, threw him into a pot of boiling oil, which was so hot that the prisoner later said that he saw the mans bones sticking out from his flesh. :muddlehea And then the enemy told him that this is what they would do to him if he didnt give Islam. But the man still refused. So then they took him and they were about to through him into the boiling oil and when he was aboce it he started to cry. So then the enemy thought they had finally made him crack so they didnt kil him and they put him done and they said to him something to the effect that 'we finally got to you'. And then he said to them, I wasnt crying out of fear, I was crying because I regreted that I did not have more lifes with which I could be sacrifice for the sake of God!

Subhanallah!! Now thats what I call faith! He didnt cry out to God and ask why he has been forsaken, no, he accepted God's will and was happy with it! And yet your "perfect son of God" wasnt perfect enough, not even in faith, to act in such a way! how is that perfection, let alone divinity?

hahahaha I was thinking of the very "rock" question you posed, before I even got to where you brought it up. The problem with it is that you are looking at just one side of the triangle. That Jesus (pbuh) choose to limit himself and live devoid of those powers, doesn't mean that they are not a part of his nature. When I play with my grandchildren, I could win any game I were to choose to win. But I don't. Not because I cheat and throw them the game (though, I've been known to do that too), but because I handicap myself to play only on my knees or in some other way. That doesn't mean that I'm not really taller or faster or have whatever other ability, but I elect to give up that ability for a time. I am not truly disabled. But I do not exercise all of my ability. I empty myself of the ability to jump higher and run faster, but of course they are still a part of my nature. But for the period of time that I am interacting with my grandkids they are not evident.

But you are talking about a physical advantage that you may have. Knowledge and wisdom arent something that you can give up. If you played against those kids a intellegence based game and the questin was asked, you would still know the answer better then them (assuming they very young kids lol). You can control that you know that 5+6=11 while they might not even know what 'plus' even means yet (at there age). And even if you did pretend you didnt know, it makes no difference, because you still know. So in the same way, how can God give up being all-wise and saying something like "why have you forsaken me?". Has he forgetten that this is his own plan that he is undertaking?! :confused:
I said that the people who received the message of the prophets strayed and continued to stay from God. I don't think that is different from your understanding. Are there not people who received the Prophet Muhhamed's (pbuh) message that still strayed from God? Are there not people who still continue to stray from God? I see no difference.

Oh ok, i thought you meant that the prophets (peace be upon them) strayed from the message. My mistake.

So, on that we are basically agreed. Except for I don't distinguish between major and minor sins. A sin is anything that separates us from God. Imagine an electrical connection. If the connection is broken, it doesn't matter if the break in the connection is a few millimeters or if it is kilometers. The current stops following. So too, the Holy Spirit (I know you don't believe in the concept) is God's presence following through our lives. But sin breaks that fellowship we were created to have with God. It doesn't matter the size of the sin. We can return to being obedient, but unless we repair the damage of that sin there will still be a break in the connection between us and God.

I dont think I really like that analogy as it assumes we need to be perfect to be 'connected' to God. Also, it doesnt distinguish between say, murder or disbelief in God, and say, a Muslim shaking hands with a member of the oppostie gender (we do not do this incase you didnt know). One sin is much more serious than the other, although yes both are sins, though if not forigen, the punishment for one sin is greater than the punishment for the other. And yes all sins remove us from God, but a bigger sin removes us more than a minor sin.

Of course, we have many role models too. All of the prophets you mentioned. But even more Jesus (pbuh). Because while the prophets committed these "minor" sins you speak of, Jesus (pbuh) didn't even do that. And given that he was also human, then he shows a way for the rest of us humans (if we get cleansed of our sins) to live a perfectly obedient life in follow connection with God just as he did.

See the above reference to why I dont think Jesus (the god version) was sinless or perfect.

I can try. Let's see what questions you have from what I have said here and then I'll take this and the following questions on. :happy:

I don't think so, but can we keep this question in reserve till we are sure we understand each other (not that I expect that we will agree) on the above issues being disucssed.

I really would like answers to these also!:happy:

I love it. You really challenge me to think. My son's girlfriend, asked some of these same questions today at lunch. You helped me to be better prepared. Thanks!! :thankyou:

lol ok no worries. Did she ask as many quesions as me?
 
On the other side of the coin, one could say that an all-knowing, all-powerful God could somehow intentionally relinquish control over an object and let it come to rest with no influence from Him. If you believe this one, does it diminish God's omnipotence in any way?

Well, firstly, why would he want to do that? Secondly, flipping a coin is something humans do, not God...

I do not think think that such a thing can happen, God will always know what will happen to the coin... because he created it that way.

There is no such thing as "no influence from Him". He is the one who created and designed the gravity that would make it fall, and the laws of physics that govern how it will act, and He is the one Who will determine how it is thrown, which obviously would effect how it would land.

Therefore, silly question! lol. And to be honest, this is philsophy type stuff, I am no philosopher, nor is there much room for philosophy in Islam. That nature of God is something simply beyond our comprehension so there is almost no use enterntainng the atheist who waste their lives coming up with such foolish questions.

I look forward to your reply (on the above post in particular)!
 
Last edited:
I believe that God always does things in a greatest good way, which is slightly different from saying God can do anything. So if you take a quality like love, then God would be the greatest source of love.

Yes I can agree with that.

Can God love us more than he loves himself?

Or could the words of the greatest commandments possibly be used to describe God’s love.

:?
God loves all that he is; with all his heart, soul, mind and strength?
God loves each and every one of us as he loves himself?

No, Muslims do not believe that He loves us all. He only loves those who believe in Him and do good deeds.
I have reflected on these words for the last seven years, and they seem to carry an awesome power. But they are purely thoughts, I have had no conscious revelations to say there is any truth in these words.

To me they seem like confusing (and rather not important questions). Although to honest I have never even come across this idea of God loving Himself. What does statement even mean? We can only understand from our human understanding of love, which I believe is probably rather limited.

So yeh I have no idea on this topic at all to be honest, but if I come across the Islamic understanding of this I will be sure to let you know, inshaallah.

:)
 
There is an interesting quality of us humans we love to ask questions, and often our questions are meaningless and when analyzed found to not even be question, just illogical statements.

The question of flipping the coin is one of those perplexing things. It sure does sound like a quetion, it looks like one and even has a question mark at the end. But, this falls into the realm of the age old arguement of what happens if an immovable object is hit by an iresistable force? Sounds logical, except by definition both do not exist at the same time. If there was such a thing as an immovable object, there would be no such thing as an irresistable force and vice versa. the basic definition of either rules out the existance of the other.

Now to the coin flipping:

Can God(swt) flip a coin randomly? That looks like a very logical and sensible question. But, is it an actual question or is it merely a hypothetical thought of a non-existant concept?

God(swt) created the material the coin is made of.
God(swt) is not limited by the laws of the physical world.

Randomnise is not a quality of God(swt)
God(swt) is not random.
His creations are not random.

If the coin were to be flipped without Gods(swt) it would not be Gods(swt) creation. But, God(swt) created all things.

The coin is subject to the will of God(swt)
God(swt) is not subject to the will of the coin.


Conclusion: Neither you nor I can make a coin that is not under the control of God(swt)

With the question we are trying to attribute a physical charecteristic to a non-physical being. The question is meaningless.

Now getting back to the Crucifixation. We are all basing our arguements on Human concepts. The only proof either of us have, is which concept is correct the Qur'an or the Bible. For those of us who believe in the Truth of the Qur'an, no more is needed. For those who believe the Bible is the truth, no arguement is sufficient.

With that said all we can do is compare our different beliefs of the crucifixion. Neither of us is going to alter the other's belief unless we can come to an agreement as to which source is the truth.

We are trying to make an apple pie and one of us is using the telephone book and one of us is using a cookbook. We know the one using the cookbook will succeed in making the pie. However, each of us believes we are using the cookbook and the other is using the telephone book.
 
Well, I'm having this conversation about the coin-flipping on two different boards. This one here, and where it originated on a Christian board. I shared your response there Malaikah, and here is what others posted in response:

posted by Rusty:

Grace Seeker,
I think I agree with your friend, therefore he (or she) must be a genius . At least I agree with his reasoning, although I'm not sure I agree with his conclusion that the question is meaningless. It sounds as though your friend's answer to the question would be that God does not generate a random outcome from a coin flip. Is that the way you read it as well?

What I conclude from the question is that I also do not think God creates anything that is not directly and completely influenced by His creative process. I think that is a very meaningful answer to the question. Am I misunderstanding something?

So would you agree?

from: JesPeachy on Friday, December 01, 2006, 01:47 PM
YOu are using a concrete example to place a limit on how God can or can't choose to move. Illustration? perhaps, but not adefnitive proof or evidence for or against predestination, as the biblical text has evidence for and against a human action/attitude/decision in the salvific process.

COncrete constructivism and soteriology do not happy bedfellows make.

posted by Rusty:
I figured you would say that , once you realized the larger implications of the simple example. The coin example is no more concrete than the human being example. I'm not placing any limits on how God chooses to move. God is God, and He's a Big God, and nothing happens independent from Him. That's the point, and that has nothing to do with placing limits on God.

And here is my response:
Posted by Grace Seeker

Rusty, I disagree with both you and my friend. The point being, God is capable of letting go. You are asserting that there is something that God is not capable of doing.

And guess what, if you were to create a machine to flip coins, even though the machine was set up identically every time, and even though the coin was placed on it identically every time. And even though the room was controled for no extraneous air currents, and the pull of the sun and the moon were all accounted for. The coin would still turn up heads roughly 50% of the time, and tails roughly 50% of the time. Some things are truly random.

Human free will introduces an element of radomnness into our interactions with God. It is the one point over which we are responsible. Without free will, since as you say, nothing happens independent from him, you have a world in which everything is dependent on him. Those two phrases -- "nothing happens independent from him" and "everything is dependent on him" -- being synonymous.

Now what are the implications of that point of view. If everything is dependent on God, then God is the ultimate cause of all things. This is not synonymous, but I believe it does logically follow from the first. Now, since we also know that all have sinned, you have God as the ultimate cause for all sin. That statement is a logical impossibility, given the nature and character of God. So, there must be some flaw in my reasoning. And that flaw is in the opening premise, that everything is dependent on God. For God does not always choose to act. Thus we live in a world in which God causes some things, prevents some things, and simply allows (neither causing nor preventing) other things. Some things really are just random.

That thread's conversation then went off more into a discussion of human free-will versus divine predestination, which doesn't really fit in this thread.

So, returning to some of our previous thouhts...One of the things that I see which seems to bother you, Maliakah, is that God should stoop so low as to enter into humanity. Unless I am misreading you, it is as if in seeking to honor God, you also seek to be proud for God.

The kenosis idea that I mention earlier has to do with God not needing to be lifted up. Remember, God doesn't really need us for anything. God is self-sufficient. So, God does need us even to honor him. He certainly is worthy of it, but he doesn't need it. Such a God would, in my opinion (and according to my reading of the scriptures I find authoritative -- obviously we differ on those) be able to set that aside if he so choose, and it would not diminish him. Yes, Jesus can be the Almight in nature, and yet set that aside to be vulenrable and week, needing even lowly human beings to tend to his basic needs for survival. This is what the incarnation (Christmas) is all about. About God putting on flesh and becoming one among us.

There is a verse from Paul's writings that I think is appropo here:
Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. (1 Corinthians 1:22-24)
As we have discussed on another thread, Islam is not a continuation from Christianity, it is more like a continuation from Judaism. So, it is no surprise to me that we might in this forum say that the crucifixion is a stumbling block for Muslims and foolishness to agnostics and atheists. It is rooted in beliefs about the nature of God, which, if you could accept you would also likely accept Christianity. But if you reject those beliefs, and it is clear that you do, then you would reject Christianity.

However, I am enjoying this conversation, as I believe it is at least helping us to better understand each other's faith -- always a good thing. So I will return here later to address some more of your questions which I may not have really taken the time they deserved today.

Peace
 
I think I agree with your friend, therefore he (or she) must be a genius

I think I like this Rusty guy lol. :shade:

And guess what, if you were to create a machine to flip coins, even though the machine was set up identically every time, and even though the coin was placed on it identically every time. And even though the room was controled for no extraneous air currents, and the pull of the sun and the moon were all accounted for. The coin would still turn up heads roughly 50% of the time, and tails roughly 50% of the time. Some things are truly random.

Can you prove this? :? I really doubt that.

So, returning to some of our previous thouhts...One of the things that I see which seems to bother you, Maliakah, is that God should stoop so low as to enter into humanity. Unless I am misreading you, it is as if in seeking to honor God, you also seek to be proud for God.

Yes that does bother me. This is from the Quran:

019.088 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!"
019.089 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
019.090 At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin,
019.091 That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious.
019.092 For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.
[Maryam 19:88-92]​

The important part to note is the bold part. These things that you have attributed to him are not is accordance with the Majesty of God.

Anyway, for now I'll just wait for you to reply to my questions about Jesus before I reply to anything else.
 
I think I like this Rusty guy lol. :shade:
I think he's single. :statisfie


Strangely enough, regarding the coin flipping machine. Because each year the SuperBowl (American football's big annual game) is begun with a coin flip to determine who gets the ball, the NFL teams that participate have invested thousands of dollars to determine whether it is better to call heads or tails. They got results that said the odds are actually something like 49.9997 to 50.0003, but I don't remember which side was better. :embarrass Do you really want me to go back and research it?



Yes that does bother me. This is from the Quran:

019.088 They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!"
019.089 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
019.090 At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin,
019.091 That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious.
019.092 For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son.
[Maryam 19:88-92]​

The important part to note is the bold part. These things that you have attributed to him are not is accordance with the Majesty of God.

Anyway, for now I'll just wait for you to reply to my questions about Jesus before I reply to anything else.

And I can understand why, given your love of the Qur'an that you would then have the feelings you do for another scripture that challenges those ideas. While much of what we believe as Chrsitians and Muslims is very similar -- for instance, I believe we worship the same God -- there is no denying that there is no wiggle room on these points about Jesus. One set of scriptures says one thing, and the other says the exact opposite. You may never be comfortable with accepting the Bible as true and I may never be comfortable with accepting the Qur'an as true for exactly the same reason; the difference being are starting points regarding which scripture we have chosen first to believe.


As to the questions you want addressed, we have enough things that are up in the air in this discussion that perhaps it would be well to pick those which are most important. If they all are, I will happily address them one at a time, and then pray to live long enough to answer. :happy:
 
lol no no its ok lets not start talking about flipping coins, it ok you dont have to look it up.

In my opinion the most important part of my post was this part, that is the part I would like an answer to please:

Muslims believe all humans are born without sin. There is no such thing as inheriting the sins of others in Islam, that would be an injustice.

i would also like to suggest that no, Jesus was not perfect or sinless, not even by the christian vesion of event. Upin death he said something like "Oh God, why have you forsaken me?" To say such is a big sin in Islam, a very big sin, to question God's wisdom and to show a lack of patience towards his decree. Had he been 'perfect' he would have known better than to question God's will. You will find in Islamic history many such cases where people were faced with very terrible situations as bad as crucifiction, and yet they never disobeyed God as such.

For example, one of the Muslims (a companion of the prophet pbuh) was captured by the enemy as a prisoner of war. Note that he wasnt even a prophet (let alone a God in the form of a human). The enemy wished to weaken him and they told him that if he doesnt give up Islam they will kill hom, but he didnt give up his faith. And then they got another Muslim prisoner and, in front of the companion, threw him into a pot of boiling oil, which was so hot that the prisoner later said that he saw the mans bones sticking out from his flesh. And then the enemy told him that this is what they would do to him if he didnt give Islam. But the man still refused. So then they took him and they were about to through him into the boiling oil and when he was aboce it he started to cry. So then the enemy thought they had finally made him crack so they didnt kil him and they put him done and they said to him something to the effect that 'we finally got to you'. And then he said to them, I wasnt crying out of fear, I was crying because I regreted that I did not have more lifes with which I could be sacrifice for the sake of God!

Subhanallah!! Now thats what I call faith! He didnt cry out to God and ask why he has been forsaken, no, he accepted God's will and was happy with it! And yet your "perfect son of God" wasnt perfect enough, not even in faith, to act in such a way! how is that perfection, let alone divinity?

Quote:
hahahaha I was thinking of the very "rock" question you posed, before I even got to where you brought it up. The problem with it is that you are looking at just one side of the triangle. That Jesus (pbuh) choose to limit himself and live devoid of those powers, doesn't mean that they are not a part of his nature. When I play with my grandchildren, I could win any game I were to choose to win. But I don't. Not because I cheat and throw them the game (though, I've been known to do that too), but because I handicap myself to play only on my knees or in some other way. That doesn't mean that I'm not really taller or faster or have whatever other ability, but I elect to give up that ability for a time. I am not truly disabled. But I do not exercise all of my ability. I empty myself of the ability to jump higher and run faster, but of course they are still a part of my nature. But for the period of time that I am interacting with my grandkids they are not evident.

.......

But you are talking about a physical advantage that you may have. Knowledge and wisdom arent something that you can give up. If you played against those kids a intellegence based game and the questin was asked, you would still know the answer better then them (assuming they very young kids lol). You can control that you know that 5+6=11 while they might not even know what 'plus' even means yet (at there age). And even if you did pretend you didnt know, it makes no difference, because you still know. So in the same way, how can God give up being all-wise and saying something like "why have you forsaken me?". Has he forgetten that this is his own plan that he is undertaking?!​
 
Malaikah, I'm going to try to restate your questions/comments to see if I have them correct.

1) There is disagreement between us regarding the concept of original sin or inherited depravity. It is foreign to your way of thinking about human nature and intrinsic to mine. There are two question contained in it: (a) how can sins be passed on from on human being to another who had nothing to do with committing them? (b) even if such a thing were possible, how could a just God allow for that to happen and still be understood as a just God?

2) You question my assertion that Jesus was sinless, primarily on the basis of reported his cry while on the cross: "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me." You see such a statement as an exrpession of either lack of faith, or disobedience in the form of questioning God's wisdom.

3) Though not mentioned directly, you still have questions about this whole kenosis theory, for even if God were to come to earth he would still have to be fully God (including being almighty, all-knowing, eternal, and all of God's other divine attributes) or he wouldn't be God, he would be something else less than God.

Have I got the gist of your position on each of these correct. If not, please restate them and we will continue.

Btw, I know I'm not going to change your mind, I'm not even trying, but I do love the way you keep prodding me to think deeper. I'm pretty sure that once we understand where we are each coming from that we will still remain Christians and Muslim, but better informed Christian and Muslim.:)
 
Yep, youve got them all right, pretty much, but you just forget one:

4)How can God be one but three at the same time? A father, son and spirit, they are seperate physically no doubt, because the son was on earth and the father was in heaven and I dont know where the spirit was... :? you used the triangle analogy but it just doesnt work because you can pull apart the triangle and end up with only three lines that are no longer all part of the triangle... I dont think you can rip up God...:rollseyes

Also, I know you wont be able to make me change my mind and I doubt I can make you change your mind (especially because I am not knowledgable enough) but I think it is good practise for myself, for the real world.
 
4)How can God be one but three at the same time? A father, son and spirit, they are seperate physically no doubt, because the son was on earth and the father was in heaven and I dont know where the spirit was...

Who is the Holy Spirit referred to in the following verses from the Quran?

002.253 YUSUFALI: Those messengers We endowed with gifts, some above others: To one of them Allah spoke; others He raised to degrees (of honour); to Jesus the son of Mary We gave clear (Signs), and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

002.087 YUSUFALI: We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the holy spirit.

005.110 YUSUFALI: Then will Allah say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit,

016.102 YUSUFALI: Say, the Holy Spirit has brought the revelation from thy Lord in Truth, in order to strengthen those who believe, and as a Guide and Glad Tidings to Muslims.
 
Hi there.

The Holy Spirit mentioned there is the Angel Gabrial. In Arabic it is Ruh-ul-Qudus. And in case you were wondering, it isn't evidence to support the trinity. :)
 
Hi there.

The Holy Spirit mentioned there is the Angel Gabrial. In Arabic it is Ruh-ul-Qudus. And in case you were wondering, it isn't evidence to support the trinity. :)

Can you provide a verse reference in the Quran that explicitly says Gabriel is the Holy Spirit?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top