Dr. Zakir Naik

[------]

:salamext:

That could be because, like him, you know very little about philosophy.

:lol: I've actually studied philosophers in RE AS and A Level

 

[jzcasejz]

I may be wrong, but I didn't realise that falling for Zakir Naik's weak arguments was a mandatory part of Islam.

No it's not. But she was right in defending the Brother from your cheap insults. I mean, you even at one point said IbnAbdulHakim is more reasonable than Dr Naik - a point which IbnAbdulHakim himself would downright reject. I have no problem with the stuff you say as long as you present your evidences (and even then, I still wouldn't care), but for you to go round blowing your horn and making silly remarks about Zakir Naik as if you're some sort of super-intellectual is nonsense. Zakir Naik may have weak arguments, but who are you to elevate yourself and think you're a million times better? EDIT: (I'm not saying you're not, you just need to tone it down a little.)

This is not the first time you've done this, and quite frankly, it's getting lame now. So, what's new?

 

[czgibson]

Greetings,

:lol: I've actually studied philosophers in RE AS and A Level

Did any of it sink in, I wonder?

No it's not. But she was right in defending the Brother from your cheap insults. I mean, you even at one point said IbnAbdulHakim is more reasonable than Dr Naik - a point which IbnAbdulHakim himself would downright reject.

I don't doubt it. That doesn't prevent it from being true, though.

I have no problem with the stuff you say as long as you present your evidences (and even then, I still wouldn't care),

Have you read any of my posts in this thread?

but for you to go round blowing your horn and making silly remarks about Zakir Naik as if you're some sort of super-intellectual is nonsense. Zakir Naik may have weak arguments, but who are you to elevate yourself and think you're a million times better?

You agree he has weak arguments? Then where is the problem?

EDIT: (I'm not saying you're not, you just need to tone it down a little.)

Sorry if you think I'm being unduly harsh, but when I see nonsense I call it by its name.

This is not the first time you've done this, and quite frankly, it's getting lame now. So, what's new?

I do my best to promote the cause of rationality wherever possible. If you saw large numbers of young people being taken in by the nonsense of a charlatan, would you do anything about it?

Peace

 

[------]

:salamext:

Did any of it sink in, I wonder?

Most of it did, but I think their arguments were pathetic LOL about 'trying to prove God does not exist, etc' ;D

Peace!

 

[IbnAbdulHakim]

jzcase is correct, i think zakir naik is far more reasonable and knowledgable then i could hope to be. (this doesnt even need to be said)

However theres a huge amount he doesnt know, and that applies to everyone.

Challenging him to a debate would only increase him in understanding and provoke him into further research, which i would love to see people do for him as i love it for myself.