First Corrupted Verse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shoes
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 319
  • Views Views 37K
Status
Not open for further replies.
'Is god doubtful that His specifically chosen Prophet will be unable to carry out His message, why doesn't he chose someone who will be the perfect example in his private life as well as his public life? Is he incapable of sending a dignified man who excels greatly in dignity and honour?'

If GOD goes to all the trouble to find the perfect messenger then why not preserve the message?
 
Zaphran but the Torah is also confirmed in the quran or is there a different Torah too?!
Should the person writing that last bit of information about Moses take the credit for writing that whole thing and take it away from Moses?

This is seriously a joke - so you admit the last part of what you call the "torah" has been written by someone else and not Moses pbuh - subhan Allah - how many authors does it have???
 
'Is god doubtful that His specifically chosen Prophet will be unable to carry out His message, why doesn't he chose someone who will be the perfect example in his private life as well as his public life? Is he incapable of sending a dignified man who excels greatly in dignity and honour?'

If GOD goes to all the trouble to find the perfect messenger then why not preserve the message?

If God goes through all the trouble to save the Israelites then why aren't they still a good people? They rejected Jesus and constantly got punished by God.
 
.

Gossamer skye-
The problem with the verse here:

005.014
YUSUFALI: From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done.

Christians are at peace with one another- there is no enmity to judgement day. This is saying nothing about written scripture.

There is also a problem with this verse:

002.113
YUSUFALI: The Jews say: "The Christians have naught upon; and the Christians say: "The Jews have naught upon." Yet they study the Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but Allah will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment.

When did Jews ever study the Gospel?

really?

I should have to ignore this in such a case, as always you seem to know better than everyone including tale telling history:

[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]The Catholic Church was obviously corrupt throughout the middle ages - and this corruption resulted in regular calls for reform and improvement. Pope John XII had open love affairs. Urban VI tortured and murdered some of his cardinals. Innocent VIII proudly acknowledged his illegitimate children and heaped church riches upon them. Simony and nepotism were rampant. Most efforts ended in the reformers being called heretics and dying for their trouble. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]In the 1100s, Arnold of Brescia was excommunicated, hanged and then burned. John Wycliffe of England translated the bible into English, and his followers were later hunted down and killed. John Hus from Prague was excommunicated then in 1415 he was captured and burned, despite the fact that he had a letter of safe passage from the Emperor. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]But eventually the weight of the reformers grew strong enough to survive, but only at the cost of millions of lives as the Protestant Reformation battled the Catholic Counter Reformation in towns and fields throughout Europe. Martin Luther's 95 theses, nailed to a church door, set off a fire storm of violence and blood. German princes managed to fight Catholic armies to standstill by 1555, which resulted in the Peace of Augsburg. Protestant "heretics" were allowed to live in Germany, but that level of tolerance was not extended to other countries. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Unfortunately, that "peace" didn't last - from 1618 to 1648 Europe experienced The Thirty Years' War which left Germany a wasteland after millions and millions were slaughtered. Catholic armies under the leadership of Catholic Emperor Ferdinand II kept defeating Protestant armies, but then made the mistake of trying to eliminate Protestantism completely, engaging in terrible repression and persecution. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]This caused new Protestant armies in foreign lands like Denmark and Sweden to be called up to oppose him. The result of all this was a victory for no one, and an estimated drop of Germany's population from 18 million to 4 million. With too few people left to work the field and trade for goods, starvation and disease ravaged the miserable survivors. Such are the fruits of European Christianity. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Catholics Killing Protestants [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]In France, the largest Protestant group was known as the Huguenots. They were mercilessly persecuted, and King Henry created a heresy court known infamously as The Burning Chamber because that was the standard punishment for heretics. On the night of August 24, 1572 - known as St. Bartholomew's Day - Catholic soldiers swept through Huguenot neighborhoods of Paris in a foreshadowing of what would happen to the Jews under Nazi rule. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Thousands were slaughtered in their homes and other massacres timed for the same night occurred in cities across France. In response to this, Pope Gregory XIII wrote to France's King Charles IX: "We rejoice with you that with the help of God you have relieved the world of these wretched heretics." [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Pope Pius sent Catholic troops into France to aid in the repression efforts, ordering the army commander to kill all prisoners. Pius, unsurprisingly, was later canonized as a saint. In the Catholic Church, sainthood is an honor which goes not to the nicest person or to someone who has aided humanity, but to those Catholics who have done great deeds to advance the cause of Catholicism. As a result of such treatment, Huguenots fled France in large numbers. One group reached what would later become Florida - and when they were discovered by a Spanish expedition, all were killed. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]In Flanders, all heretical Protestants were ordered executed and thousands were burned at the stake. But queen Mary was merciful to Protestants who recanted - instead of burning, the men would be killed by a sword and women buried alive. Philip II, Spanish king and also ruler of Holland and Belgium, was positively obsessed with eliminating Protestantism and ordered that all prisoners be killed so that there would be no chance that they might escape through neglect or mistakes. The Duke of Alva was sent in and began what became known as the "Spanish Fury" in which thousands of Antwerp Protestants were killed and almost all "heretics" in Haarlem were massacred. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Protestants Killing Catholics [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Of course, Protestants should not be imagined as innocents in all of this. Attempting to abandon several centuries of developed church tradition, Protestant theology focused instead upon stricter adherence to scriptures. As an example, the harsher laws of the Old Testament developed greater prominence in Protestant lands than they did in Catholic lands. Protestant leaders also embraced some of the nastier doctrines of a few Catholic theologians, like Augustine's ideas about free will and predestination. Luther wrote in 1518: "Free will after the Fall is nothing but a word. Even doing what in him lies, man sins mortally." [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]In Switzerland, John Calvin created a vicious theocracy in which morality police were employed to control people's behavior. Citizens were harshly punished for a wide variety of moral infractions, including dancing, drinking, and generally being entertained. Theological dissidents were summarily executed, like Michael Servetus who was burned for doubting the Trinity. It isn't surprising that some of the nastiest Christians in America today, like Christian Reconstructionists, are unabashed Calvinists [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]During the many Huguenot wars ravaging France, Huguenot soldiers hunted priests like animals and one captain is reported to have worn a necklace of priests' ears. In England, after King Henry VIII created the Anglican Church, he went after both Catholics and Protestants. Catholic loyalists like Sir Thomas More were quickly executed, but Lutherans who doubted retained doctrines like transubstantiation were also not spared. When his daughter Mary reached the throne in 1553 she became known as "Bloody Mary" because she attempted to reinstitute Catholicism through violence - but she only managed to make the country even more Protestant. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Unsurprisingly, not all Protestants were created equal - some wretched groups were uniformly hated by all parties. One example of this is the Anabaptists, who were martyred for their faith in huge numbers. Anabaptists briefly took the German city of Munster, but Catholic armies regained control, torturing to death Anabaptist leaders with red-hot pincers. Their bodies were hung in cages from a church steeple where they remained for many years as a visible reminder of what happens to those who dare to oppose church authority. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Once again, there is quite a lot more to cover on the topic of religious violence, but I think that we've seen even more now which should lead reasonable people to conclude that religion in general, and Christianity in particular, doesn't do a very good job at all in preventing human violence. At a minimum, it does a wonderful job at serving as a justification for violence. In many cases, however, religious beliefs and attitudes appear to form the basis for violent acts or movements. In these instances, the violence would not have occurred if it had not been for religion. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Sources [/FONT]

  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Helen Ellerbe, The Dark Side of Christian History. [/FONT]
  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]James A. Haught, Holy Horrors. [/FONT]
  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]J.N. Hillgarth, Christianity and Paganism, 350-750. [/FONT]
  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Malcolm Lambert, Medieval Heresy. [/FONT]
  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]Edward Peters, Heresy and Authority in Medieval Europe. [/FONT]
  • [FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]R. Dean Peterson, A Concise History of Christianity. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana, geneva, helvetica]--> [/FONT]

I assume most Jews are more familiar with your bible than you are with it, and it is a learned decision that they'd stick with the God of the OT than a self-immolating man God of the NT?

all the best
 
Its true there is hatred of certain christains against other christains. Just as some right wing evengelicals hate the catholics -
 
Abd-al Latif- but you as a muslim believe the Holy Bible to be corrupt- so why would you suggest that one look to the Holy Bible for the story- it is different I am sure then the one in the quran.

Gossamer skye-
The problem with the verse here:

005.014
YUSUFALI: From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done.

Christians are at peace with one another- there is no enmity to judgement day. This is saying nothing about written scripture.

There is also a problem with this verse:

002.113
YUSUFALI: The Jews say: "The Christians have naught upon; and the Christians say: "The Jews have naught upon." Yet they study the Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but Allah will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment.

When did Jews ever study the Gospel?

Because there is still some reminiscence of truth in the bible that hasn't been completey altered, though most of the bible has been corrupted. The truth that still remains are things like the emergance of Muhammad (saaws) in Arabia (it's why there were jews and christians who moved to the city of Madinah in Arabia at the time when they were expecting the emergence of a new Prophet), in some verses jesus preached the oneness of God which in arabic is referred to as Tawheed which means to unify divinity to one diety. And there are other similar verses but I can't think of anything else from the top of my head.

I'm only referring you to Lot in the bible because if you compared the view of Lot in the bible to the Qur'an you will asuredly come a conclusion that the Qur'an is closer to the truth.
 
Last edited:
When did Jews ever study the Gospel?

Is that the book the Jews and the christains have in common???? there is a book that both Jews and christains claim to posses yet see it in radically different ways. Historically the christains and the jews didnt see eye to eye - thats well known and heavily documented.

002.113
YUSUFALI: The Jews say: "The Christians have naught upon; and the Christians say: "The Jews have naught upon." Yet they study the Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but Allah will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment.
 
This is seriously a joke - so you admit the last part of what you call the "torah" has been written by someone else and not Moses pbuh - subhan Allah - how many authors does it have???


Is this a serious question?

There is no Jew or Christian who seriously claims that Moses wrote the story of his own death. Of course there was an editor or redactor that attached that to finish the story. For those that hold that Moses wrote the Torah, they don't mean to imply that no other hand has touched it and the addition of Moses' death to it would not be understood as proof of corruption.

Others, more liberal in their thinking and who believe that the story of Moses writing the Torah is at best legend and at worst mythological, would say it was compiled over time by a serious of priest and scribes who edit together sources from a variety of sources. They would not call these people authors, for the stories did not originate with them but with the community. So, your question simply doesn't make sense in either context.


Is that [the Gospel, at least according to what you were discussing above] the book the Jews and the christains have in common????
Simple answer, NO. The Gospel is not a book that the Jews and the Christians have in common. (See this linked post if you are seriously looking for more information.)


Its true there is hatred of certain christains against other christains. Just as some right wing evengelicals hate the catholics -
Sadly this appears to be true. Though one might wonder how those who claim to follow the teachings of one who called us to love our enemies could hate anyone and still dare to use the name Christian? Either way, I can't figure out what this has to do with the price of tea in China?
 
Last edited:
i have one point of view regarding this misunderstanding or rather disunity between christians. i like to quote also this passage from replies before.

005.014
YUSUFALI: From those, too, who call themselves Christians, We did take a covenant, but they forgot a good part of the message that was sent them: so we estranged them, with enmity and hatred between the one and the other, to the day of judgment. And soon will Allah show them what it is they have done.

as of today, there had been a lot of christian organizations and not to forget about different versions of the bible which was used by the christians too. why would there be different version of the bible? the last of which i remember was title "new international version". why would they change the bible?

notably as of today, there is no unity within the different christian organizations, the reason of which i dont know why. or was this their punishment???

Allah(swt) is the only one god, to him only is all glory and praise. we should have no other god than him. he is the sole provider, all our prayers should be offered to him only. he never told us that we should praise and glorify other people also.

Assalam Alaykum.
 
I assume most Jews are more familiar with your bible than you are with it, and it is a learned decision that they'd stick with the God of the OT than a self-immolating man God of the NT?

Dear Gossamer:

You are aware that both the Bible and the Qur'an teach that Jesus is the Messiah. Please do not reject or deny Him because of the error of others.

Regards,
Grenville
 
Dear Gossamer:

You are aware that both the Bible and the Qur'an teach that Jesus is the Messiah. Please do not reject or deny Him because of the error of others.

Regards,
Grenville
I beg your pardon? I most certainly will not accept Jesus as a god.. I give him his due respect as a messenger of God.. it isn't Muslims that are selling a Jesus doll at borders or in walmart next to bratz dolls!

all the best
 
Dear Gossamer:

You are aware that both the Bible and the Qur'an teach that Jesus is the Messiah. Please do not reject or deny Him because of the error of others.

Regards,
Grenville

Yes, Muslims and Christians both agree Jesus is the Messiah, but we have very different interpretations as to what Messiah actually means (ie, we wouldn't capitalize the pronoun 'him' when referring to Jesus).
 
I beg your pardon? I most certainly will not accept Jesus as a god.. I give him his due respect as a messenger of God.. it isn't Muslims that are selling a Jesus doll at borders or in walmart next to bratz dolls!

all the best
Dear Gossamer:

Who said anything about accepting Jesus as a God? The Biblical support for that teaching is quite weak. Apparently, you have not been following the thread “Is there any Biblical evidence that describes Jesus as God?”

With that barrier out of the way, do you accept Jesus as the Messiah as described in the Bible and the Qur’an?

Regards,
Grenville
 
Yes, Muslims and Christians both agree Jesus is the Messiah, but we have very different interpretations as to what Messiah actually means (ie, we wouldn't capitalize the pronoun 'him' when referring to Jesus).

Well Rpwelton, what does the Messiah actually mean to you?

Regards,
Grenville
 
Well Rpwelton, what does the Messiah actually mean to you?

Regards,
Grenville

Well, let's go back to Biblical sources, shall we?

Messiah simply means "anointed one". There were many such Prophets called Messiah in the Old Testament. It's simply a title given to a Prophet. See this site:

http://www.worldofthebible.com/Bible Studies/The Concept of the Messiah in the Old Testament.pdf

So Messiah is simply a person specially chosen by God. Jesus is not unique in this sense, as there were others before him given that title (if we're going by the Bible).

I must say, however, that I can't figure out your theology Grenville. You don't believe Jesus is God, yet you capitalize 'him' when referring to Jesus. What exactly do you believe and how does it differ from mainline Christianity?
 
Last edited:
Well, let's go back to Biblical sources, shall we?

Messiah simply means "anointed one". There were many such Prophets called Messiah in the Old Testament. It's simply a title given to a Prophet. See this site:

http://www.worldofthebible.com/Bible Studies/The Concept of the Messiah in the Old Testament.pdf

So Messiah is simply a person specially chosen by God. Jesus is not unique in this sense, as there were others before him given that title (if we're going by the Bible).

I must say, however, that I can't figure out your theology Grenville. You don't believe Jesus is God, yet you capitalize his name. What exactly do you believe and how does it differ from mainline Christianity?

Hi Rpwelton:

1. There is no dispute that the Bible and the Qur’an teach that Jesus is a Messenger. But they both teach that He is more than a Messenger. He was born of a Virgin, performed many miracles, including rising the dead, and He is the Messiah. He is quite unique.

2. I use capitals as a mark of respect. If you noticed, I capitalised the first letter of your username.

3. I believe what is explicitly stated in the Bible. I have found that a common-sense reading of the Bible and the Qur’an reveals harmony between their principal teachings, without compromising any teaching or damaging the integrity of any verse in the Bible or the Qur’an. You can read the thread “Harmony between the Bible and the Qur’an” for the evidence.

4. There are Christian and Islamic religious traditions which are not supported by the Bible and the Qur’an respectively. However, those traditions that actually conflict with the Bible and the Qur’an have become unnecessary barriers dividing Christians and Muslims. Worse still, those traditions about the nature of Jesus have led Islamic religious tradition to minimize the role of the Messiah and the Gospel.

Regards,
Grenville
 
Hi Rpwelton:

1. There is no dispute that the Bible and the Qur’an teach that Jesus is a Messenger. But they both teach that He is more than a Messenger. He was born of a Virgin, performed many miracles, including rising the dead, and He is the Messiah. He is quite unique.

2. I use capitals as a mark of respect. If you noticed, I capitalised the first letter of your username.

3. I believe what is explicitly stated in the Bible. I have found that a common-sense reading of the Bible and the Qur’an reveals harmony between their principal teachings, without compromising any teaching or damaging the integrity of any verse in the Bible or the Qur’an. You can read the thread “Harmony between the Bible and the Qur’an” for the evidence.

4. There are Christian and Islamic religious traditions which are not supported by the Bible and the Qur’an respectively. However, those traditions that actually conflict with the Bible and the Qur’an have become unnecessary barriers dividing Christians and Muslims. Worse still, those traditions about the nature of Jesus have led Islamic religious tradition to minimize the role of the Messiah and the Gospel.

Regards,
Grenville

I am not saying Jesus is not unique (indeed he is in many aspects), I am simply saying that the title of Messiah is not unique to Jesus.

I'm not sure what you mean by saying that Jesus is "more than a Messenger". Can you elaborate?

As per GreyKode's post below, Jesus was no more than a Messenger. He performed miracles through the power of God, but he could of himself do nothing.
 
Last edited:
1. There is no dispute that the Bible and the Qur’an teach that Jesus is a Messenger. But they both teach that He is more than a Messenger. He was born of a Virgin, performed many miracles, including rising the dead, and He is the Messiah. He is quite unique.


All prophets had miracles, this argument of miracles proves nothing about any special status given to prophet jesus(pbuh).Moses split the sea, Adam was born from neither father nor mother etc etc..

The Qur'an clearly ststea that Jesus(pbuh) is no more than a messenger "And other messengers have passed before him".

And what about the agreement of both the Qur'an and the bible of prophet muhammad (pbuh)'s prophecy.

And suppose Jesus(pbuh) did have special status as you claim, what now, should we worship him??

In the "Harmony between bible and Quran" thread, one time you say Jesus(pbuh) is not God only a slave and messenger, the other time you say he is son of GOD.

NOW please explain, how can he be a son of GOD according to the Qur'an when the Quran clearly negates this point? How can this be considered a point of harmony or agreement?

And if so, care to explain to us how can one become a son of GOD?
 
I am not saying Jesus is not unique (indeed he is in many aspects), I am simply saying that the title of Messiah is not unique to Jesus.

I'm not sure what you mean by saying that Jesus is "more than a Messenger". Can you elaborate?

As per GreyKode's post below, Jesus was no more than a Messenger. He performed miracles through the power of God, but he could of himself do nothing.

Hi Rpwelton:

The Qur’an describes Jesus as the Messiah, and directs the reader to believe the revelation sent to the prophets who came before Mohammed. Perhaps the most authenticated book in the Bible is the work of prophet Isaiah, who said:

But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed.

We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before her shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth. (Isaiah 53:5-7)​

I am painfully aware that the Christian religious traditions of the trinity has resulted in the reaction of Islamic religious tradition to limit Jesus to “just a messenger”. Even though the Qur’an clearly teaches that He is the Messiah, and instructs believers to believe the revelation sent before, including the Gospel, in order to better understand these concepts.

I would urge you not to reject or deny the Messiah because of other people’s speculative opinions about the nature of Jesus, for it is He before whom we must all stand and give an account at the end of the age. May you also stand confidently Rpwelton.

Regards,
Grenville
 
Hi Rpwelton:

The Qur’an describes Jesus as the Messiah, and directs the reader to believe the revelation sent to the prophets who came before Mohammed. Perhaps the most authenticated book in the Bible is the work of prophet Isaiah, who said:

But he was pierced for our transgressions,
he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him,
and by his wounds we are healed.

We all, like sheep, have gone astray,
each of us has turned to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.

He was oppressed and afflicted,
yet he did not open his mouth;
he was led like a lamb to the slaughter,
and as a sheep before her shearers is silent,
so he did not open his mouth. (Isaiah 53:5-7)​

I am painfully aware that the Christian religious traditions of the trinity has resulted in the reaction of Islamic religious tradition to limit Jesus to “just a messenger”. Even though the Qur’an clearly teaches that He is the Messiah, and instructs believers to believe the revelation sent before, including the Gospel, in order to better understand these concepts.

I would urge you not to reject or deny the Messiah because of other people’s speculative opinions about the nature of Jesus, for it is He before whom we must all stand and give an account at the end of the age. May you also stand confidently Rpwelton.

Regards,
Grenville

What does "Messiah" mean to you? Please answer that first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top