Sorry I misread your post.
CASTRATION! I guess it's a fair enough punishment.
To answer your question: if the upbringing was horrendous, then why not.
Background check proves nothing? I think not. Hence the name; check his background. It does more than nothing I can assure you.
Brother, I'm not bashing you at all lol. Please don't take it personally. I'm against your idea not you. Please forgive me if it seemed like a personal attack.
Back ground checks can only prove that the rapist had a bad upbringing, not the reason for commiting the rape. There are millions of people who've been brought up undesirably. If all of them were to rape due to that reason, none of us would be safe. A psychologist once said that it is impossible to read anyone's mind. They can only assess by what information they receive from that person. So, checks aren't a foulproof method of proving that a person's upbringing was to blame for the crime.
You did say 'emotionless' but I won't bother quoting it. You really think that somewhere in the world a place full of people exists who think it's ok to rape and they talk about doing it? And a poor brain-washed rapist then decides he wants to do it too? But we got to let him off cuz he was brought up in Rape County? Lol, that's just a really absurd notion you have.I never said emotionless - I said maybe he thought what he was doing was OK since everybody in his neighbourhood talked about it/did it. Do I really have to repeat over and over again