Sami Zaatari
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 386
- Reaction score
- 60
Could you provide some facts or evidence to support your opinion(s)? To label someone a traitor is a huge thing, and should not be taken lightly, nor should the word 'traitor' be used lightly.
I noticed Hamas aren't very pro-progess either. When questioned about some of their actions on Hard Talk on BBC, one of the Hamas representatives couldn't answer a single question directly.
I think Palestinians need to understand that they currently don't have the power to topple Israel. Once they understand that, things can change for the better. In my opinion anyways.
fatah is recieving support from the USA and israel, if thats not being traitors then what is? if we replaced fatah with maronite christians in lebanon there would be no doubt or debate about being a traitor, and this is exactly what the maronites in lebanon did! hence they are no different. number 2, fatah started this problem because of their own stupid greediness of wanting power, hamas didnt start the fight, fatah did, they came threatening to make new elections out of no where acting as if they are a big bully when infact they arent, hamas are much more motivated then fatah and have the wide support. u can bet that israel is secretly helping fatah with inteligance info etc.
and whats pro-progress? recognizing israels right to exist? hamas arent a secular group, they are an Islamic group, so hence bring me one proof from shariah that says when a non muslim comes and steals your land, kills you, and kicks you out that you must make peace with them and sit down and recognize their right to exist. Islam says otherwise, it says you can make jihad to defend your land and bring it back, not only that, israel hasnt only stolen land, they occupy our third holiest site hence it becomes obligatory for those muslims to fight until its liberated, hence what is pro-progress? im assuming pro-progress is selling yourself out to recognize the right of a thief and murderor?!!!!!!!!! your **** right hamas isnt pro-progress, because in todays world pro-progress for muslims means leaving Islam and bowing to the western powers, thats what you call pro-progress today, but wanting to stick to Islam and sharia is called backwardness!
as for the palestinians not being able to defeat israel, says who? such comments are made by people who have weak emaan (faith). are you saying israel is more powerful than Allah? if muslims fight israel with true sincerity for Allah not even israel and usa with all its nukes can defeat you even if you were carrying sticks! and the Quran even affirms this, that if you fight sincerly for Allah, even against a stronger and mightier opponent who outnumbers you you will still win! and this is the problem with us muslims today, and why were not winning, its because our faith is weak, we think that israel and usa are soooooooo powerful that we get scared of them (not me that is) when you should only fear Allah and have faith in him and his power which he affirms for himself.
why do you think the early muslims who were outnumbered by 10-1 always managed to defeat the large persian armies combined with the byzantines, and etc etc, it was because they had true faith, they werent blind and they didnt give in to dillusion that an enemy is so strong you cant fight him because he will simply crush us, nop they had true and strong faith in Allah hence they always won. but today we dont have this, neither did we in the 60's or 70's, we always lost to israel before why? because we fought under the banner of nationalism, which is fighting for someone other than Allah! no wonder we lost in 6 days and got humiliated, Allah will do that to us if we turn our back on him.
thirdly, when the prophet began fighting back the pagans, he was in no shape to fight them, he was outnumbered, didnt have good equipment compared to theirs, and not only that the quraysh had many many horses compared to the muslims who only had 2! hence if we want to use the logic that we cant fight someone because they are much stronger and better equiped then us then this would mean the prophet should have never fought then! but he did fight them, because Allah was on the side of the muslims, and the muslims had faith and completly believed that Allah was supporting them hence they did not fear the pagans might, and lo and behold the pagans were easily defeated in the first battle. the muslims lost in the second battle, why? because they disobeyed god and we lost! you see? Allah has set examples for us from 1400 years ago! that if you have faith and strong faith in Allah, knowing he will help you, then you shall win i.e. battle of badr, however so if you disobey Allah, lose obediance, etc then you shall lose i.e. battle of uhud.
so palestinians should never give in, they should perhaps make a 20 year truce after a palestinian state is made, so they can regroup, train, get stronger, just like the muslims did after the treaty of hudaybiyah, the muslims were 700 in number when the treaty was made, in 2 years they were 10000 and easily took back makkah without shedding of blood. but however so the muslims regrouped and made a treaty ONLY AFTER they had a state of their own in Madinah, muslims in palestine dont even have a state, hence any question of a truce or peace treaty when they have no stable state of their own is futile and useless. this is what you call pro-progress, pro-progress isnt making peace with israel when they wont hand you a palestinian state, what kind of nonsense is that? thats just pro-israel to give them more time to build more settlements in the west bank!
