If they're in for the gas, why did they withdraw in 2005?
Some how you still think I am pro Israel. The fact that I condemn Hamas for the 7,000+ rockets they have shot at Israel civilians does not make me pro Israel, it makes me anti terrorism.
There is no "Good" guys is this fight. Neither have peace as a primary objective and I condemn them both.
It would be true that I do not "condemn both equally as you have done so far".I have no intention of going point to point with you. With a 60+ year old conflict, there is an endless supply of points, for both sides.
Najm,
As I said before
It would be true that I do not "condemn both equally as you have done so far".
But our major difference is that I support neither and my first hope is peace.
To be honest those of us who are Muslim do not have the exact same views as a non-Muslim.
It is true the crude rockets fired from Gaza are capable of causing death however, some of us see it more as an act of defiance by vigilantes taking matters into their own hands and not as a massive attack against Israel. Anybody with some military knowledge would know that the Qassams and Katyusha rockets are not effective military weapons and highly ineffective in the manner they are deployed. The Katyusha is designed to be fired in mass barrages by the thousand to spray a small area. Firing one at a time is just a way to get people mad. The qassams are homemade and of little more use as a weapon as a fourth of July skyrocket.
To many of us the analogy is like teenagers shoot fireworks at a government entity and the government responds with a full military assault.
We tend to see this as over-retaliation. Massive Death in exchange for an attention getting act.
I find that a very sad and disheartening statement.To be honest those of us who are Muslim do not have the exact same views as a non-Muslim.
It is true the crude rockets fired from Gaza are capable of causing death however, some of us see it more as an act of defiance by vigilantes taking matters into their own hands and not as a massive attack against Israel. Anybody with some military knowledge would know that the Qassams and Katyusha rockets are not effective military weapons and highly ineffective in the manner they are deployed. The Katyusha is designed to be fired in mass barrages by the thousand to spray a small area. Firing one at a time is just a way to get people mad. The qassams are homemade and of little more use as a weapon as a fourth of July skyrocket.
To many of us the analogy is like teenagers shoot fireworks at a government entity and the government responds with a full military assault.
We tend to see this as over-retaliation. Massive Death in exchange for an attention getting act.
I find that a very sad and disheartening statement.
How can I interoperate that any way other than it is ok to shoot rockets at civilian areas that are of no military value, as long as the shooters practice the same religion as I do?
It seems one could follow that logic to justify flying airplanes into buildings.
And obviously some do. Surly you don’t.
Najm,
As I said before
It would be true that I do not "condemn both equally as you have done so far".
But our major difference is that I support neither and my first hope is peace.
That is true, but when an "attention getting act" kills the citizens of another state that act becomes an "act of war."
It is not an attempt to justify, just an explanation as to how views differ. It is wrong to shoot rockets into civilian areas, but there is a vast difference between the obsolete rockets shot by hot headed kids and the guided missiles fired back by trained militia.. True the rockets can cause death and injury, but for the most part they are just a lot of noise with little damage.
No I would not like having rockets shot at me, but hopefully I would retaliate with much less destructive fire power and not try to eradicate an entire population.
Its nevertheless really dishearthening and not to mention scary and worrisome to see people, and I cant help but to call it as the way I see it, justifying terrorism. People have really died because of these attacks by these "hot heated kids".
On a sidenote, how am I supposed to view Islam and muslims if the shooting of thousands of rockets into Israel is largely either ignored or downplayed and the only real reason I can think of why this is done is because the people doing this, those "hot heated kids" are muslims.
Not to mention the promotion of the propaganda of the evil Israelis wanting to eradicate palestinians. Latest escalation of this conflict is already twice as long as the Russia-Georgia conflict yet not until recently reaching the same casualty levels. Not forgetting lack of similar actions towards West Bank and the high volume of the humanitarian aid directed from Israel to palestinians.
I find that a very sad and disheartening statement.
How can I interoperate that any way other than it is ok to shoot rockets at civilian areas that are of no military value, as long as the shooters practice the same religion as I do?
It seems one could follow that logic to justify flying airplanes into buildings.
And obviously some do. Surly you don’t.
“Israel is punishing sick civilians as a way to hurt Hamas, and that’s legally and morally wrong,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, director of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East division. “Israel remains the occupying power in Gaza despite disengagement, and thus has a legal obligation to facilitate medical care to the greatest extent possible.”
...Source...
According to the United Nations, an average of 40 patients per day entered Israel from Gaza for medical treatment in July 2007. In September 2007, that number was down to 5.
...Source...
The daily lives of most of 1.5 million Gazans are increasingly consumed by completing the most basic tasks,
such as collecting and storing clean water, and searching for food, fuel and other essential supplies. Many have
reported a growing sense of being trapped, physically, intellectually and emotionally.
....Source... <<< UN source
I have no intention of going point to point with you. With a 60+ year old conflict, there is an endless supply of points, for both sides.
I'm not pro Israel
I support neither
Yet it seams to you can't comprehend the fact I don't justify Israel's actions.I condemn them both
Najm,
Let me try a third time. You don't seam to grasp the point.
Also I have stated:
Yet it seams to you can't comprehend the fact I don't justify Israel's actions.
I want peace first, you don't.
Lets agree to disagree.
I believe Wilma has mentioned previously that indeed she doesn't have a solution.Peace...
Great, i understand all that except the solution. Where is it?
Lets get it right, i want peace. The peace that you want is temporary, something you cant comprehend, something is not possible. What is your understanding of peace?
For me simply the the freedom of Gaza, for the people to have the same humans rights as anywhere. Living in harmony, tranquillity, calmness, free from anxiety.
I would also like to add, i admire you persistence, attitude and calmness, it pleases me :-[
Peace...
Peace...
Great, i understand all that except the solution. Where is it?
Lets get it right, i want peace. The peace that you want is temporary, something you cant comprehend, something is not possible. What is your understanding of peace?
For me simply the the freedom of Gaza, for the people to have the same humans rights as anywhere. Living in harmony, tranquillity, calmness, free from anxiety.
I would also like to add, i admire you persistence, attitude and calmness, it pleases me :-[
Peace...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.