renak
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 403
- Reaction score
- 15
Quote:
May I ask why you think it isn't the mans responsibility to deal with his lust, opposed to making the woman deal with it for him?
In Islam it goes for both. Men have to lower their gazes and women cover up. The resposibility lies with both. Naturally the female form is attractive to men. The pious men will lower their gazes in front of covered or non-covered women. But the immorals ones will sexually harrass non-covered women not the covered ones. If you cross a busy motorway and get hit by a car, who's fault it is? Your's for exposing yourself to that danger. So women exposing themselves infront of men and not expecting to be viewed as sexual objects are out of touch with reality. Like you said, "
I don't believe that humans can control their sexuality." So why expect men to control their urges if you're giving them an eyeful of what is naturally attractive to them.
I've yet to meet a muslim man (or any man) who lowed his gaze at any woman. Perhaps this is because I live in the USA. It may be true that the immoral muslim men may sexually harass the non-covered woman. If this is the case, I say bring it on big boy. You're in my country and you'll play by my rules. ;D
By choosing not to cover myself I am not inviting danger. A man who is unable to control his primal urges is the danger. We are not animals, we are human beings with the capicity to reason and act accordingly.
I may be giving them an eyeful of what is naturally attractive to them. However, they are giving me an eyeful as well. They may be dressed casual, or in a suit...it doesn't really matter. If they are handsome and/or conduct themselves in a charming and confident manner, I will be attracted to them. Also, if they drive a luxury vehicle, which many muslims do in my area (lol), that may even attract me more. They know this.
May I ask why you think it isn't the mans responsibility to deal with his lust, opposed to making the woman deal with it for him?
In Islam it goes for both. Men have to lower their gazes and women cover up. The resposibility lies with both. Naturally the female form is attractive to men. The pious men will lower their gazes in front of covered or non-covered women. But the immorals ones will sexually harrass non-covered women not the covered ones. If you cross a busy motorway and get hit by a car, who's fault it is? Your's for exposing yourself to that danger. So women exposing themselves infront of men and not expecting to be viewed as sexual objects are out of touch with reality. Like you said, "
I don't believe that humans can control their sexuality." So why expect men to control their urges if you're giving them an eyeful of what is naturally attractive to them.
I've yet to meet a muslim man (or any man) who lowed his gaze at any woman. Perhaps this is because I live in the USA. It may be true that the immoral muslim men may sexually harass the non-covered woman. If this is the case, I say bring it on big boy. You're in my country and you'll play by my rules. ;D
By choosing not to cover myself I am not inviting danger. A man who is unable to control his primal urges is the danger. We are not animals, we are human beings with the capicity to reason and act accordingly.
I may be giving them an eyeful of what is naturally attractive to them. However, they are giving me an eyeful as well. They may be dressed casual, or in a suit...it doesn't really matter. If they are handsome and/or conduct themselves in a charming and confident manner, I will be attracted to them. Also, if they drive a luxury vehicle, which many muslims do in my area (lol), that may even attract me more. They know this.
Last edited: