Indian preacher Zakir Naik is banned from UK

  • Thread starter Thread starter YusufNoor
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 88
  • Views Views 13K
Status
Not open for further replies.
The home secretary can stop people entering the UK if she believes there is a threat to national security, public order or the safety of citizens.
This ***** is just jealous and afraid of people getting the right understanding of Islam. She is a hypocrite!

At least Allah is showing us people's true faces! Dr. Zakir is not only loved by Muslims, but many non-Muslims too. These people are now just so busted. Now the whole world can see their hypocrisy.

HAHAAAHA!



Home Office sources told The Daily Telegraph that website footage had shown the preacher making the claim that every Muslim should embrace terrorism.

Website footage is considered published material.

Dr Naik said Muslims should beware of people saying Osama bin Laden was right or wrong, adding: 'If you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enmies of Islam, I am for him.

'If he is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, every Muslim should be a terrorist.'

He is also reported as saying that western women make themselves ' more susceptible to rape' by wearing revealing clothing.
There is a good terrorism too. Whenever a robber looks at a police man, he gets afraid, he gets terrified! So for the robber, the police man is a TERRORIST!

Same way, if any rapist, any thief, any robber, looks at a true Muslim, he SHOULD feel terrified! In this good sense,
EVERY MUSLIM SHOULD BE A TERRORIST!!!

Our beloved Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) has said that if you see an evil, stop it with your hand. If you are not able to do this, then stop it with your mouth. And if you are not able to even do this, then at least curse it in your heart and this is the lowest degree of faith!

It is an obligation on every Muslim, to stop the evil using force.
But we also know that nowadays, this word "terrorist" is used for those people who terrorize innocent people. So in this context, no Muslim Should ever be a terrorist!


This is what Dr. Zakir Naik says in his lectures.

Dr Naik said Muslims should beware of people saying Osama bin Laden was right or wrong, adding: 'If you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enmies of Islam, I am for him.
'If he is terrorising the terrorists, if he is terrorising America the terrorist, the biggest terrorist, every Muslim should be a terrorist.'
I have never heard Dr. Zakir saying this statement. Never ever!
Dr. zakir says:
If we trust the media in Osama's regard then we'll have to believe that Osama is a terrorist. This is because media always portrays him as such.
So if we have to go with BBC and CNN, then we have to believe that Osama is a terrorist.
But as Dr. Zakir says that we muslims should always beware of the source and authenticity of the news which we are receiving. Allah has commanded us in Quran that "check up the news before we pass it on to others!" So Dr. Zakir says that I DON"T KNOW what Osama really is!!!

He is also reported as saying that western women make themselves ' more susceptible to rape' by wearing revealing clothing.

So what is wrong with the statement. Though I don't know whether Dr. zakir really said it but I say that

"Western women make themselves ' more susceptible to rape' by wearing revealing clothing."

It is what my logic says!

Suppose that there are two twin sisters walking down the street. Both are equally beautiful. One is wearing a mini skirt and the other is wearing a proper Islamic hijab i.e. her whole body is covered and only face, hands and feet can be seen.

Now there is a hooligan waiting around the corner, to tease a girl; waiting for a catch.

Now which sister will he tease?
A. One wearing the full Islamic clothe or
B. the one wearing a mini skirt?

This is the hypocrisy of Western world! Calling themselves as one who respect people's freedom of speech! Down these people with their LIES!!!






 
Last edited:
I agree that some of his comments are stupid,
And by saying this brother Supreme, it is now actually YOUR comment that is stupid!

but they're not a security risk, and I can't really see non-Muslims being up in arms about his silly comments. Silly comments should be ridiculed, not banned.

And would you please like to give examples of some of his "silly" comments?

And quoting from books means nothing when it isn't done in the proper context.

Which quote he gave, which was not in the proper context???

He's hardly Osama bin Laden. I haven't really seen him make any offensive comments to other religions- from what I've seen, all he ever seems to do is make erroneous assumptions about other religions whilst professing to the crowd how great Islam is. Hardly a threat, very much free speech.
You know something- you can keep your comments with you!!! because the person your talking about has read both YOUR bible, Hindu scriptures, Sikh's scriptures etc. So saying that he makes "erroneous assumptions" is totally silly and wrong of you!

He is a student of comparative religions, and had hundreds of times dialogues with your priests! Why didn't any of your scholars ever said it on his face? Because this is just an allegation your laying against him.

I see no truth in what you say!
 
Wait... what? I'm on your side here! I agree that his ban is totally stupid and wrong.

I'l address your post later, if I have time.
 
^ Yeah I know you also disprove of this ban. But you have also called Dr. Zakir naik giving silly comments and making "erroneous assumptions"!

This I find silly and stupid!!!

And yeah I'll be waiting for your reply no doubt!
 
we should all make dua inshallah that he get entry again. dua is our weapon dear sis. im also really angry too :(
 
Totally agree! That is how Allah's plan works! You know after 911, instead of a decrease in Islam's support, people actually embraced it in thousands!!!

People became more curious of what Islam is! They studied it and realized the truth! Allahu Akbar!

And these filthy maggots are totally aware of how great a debater Dr. Zakir Naik is. That is why they've banned him. They have given these flimsy excuses...even a person like me can refute all of it!

They know that more the people hear Dr. Zakir, more they will get right understanding of Islam!

Yes, let them plot and plan, and my Allah plans too. And Allah is the best of the planner!!!

InshAllah one day, we'll laugh at their faces!!!

Do you know that your country happily embraces British culture due to their slavery to them? Right hand driving? constitution? Political system? British schools? You should not be against the British.
 
He's hardly Osama bin Laden. I haven't really seen him make any offensive comments to other religions- from what I've seen, all he ever seems to do is make erroneous assumptions about other religions whilst professing to the crowd how great Islam is. Hardly a threat, very much free speech.

What Supreme said. While his arguments are nowhere near as convincing as those who already accept them seem to think, Naik is a serious scholar and, as far as I'm aware, a man of peace not violence.
 
Interestingly, although not surprisingly, all the atheists, agnostics and other non-muslims are DEAFENINGLY silent about this news, when they were so viciously defended the right of morons whoblasphemed the prophet SAW and consciously incited hatred.

This news is the latest evident of Islamophobia among the western government and western media.
 
Do you know that your country happily embraces British culture due to their slavery to them? Right hand driving? constitution? Political system? British schools? You should not be against the British.

If you have nothing constructive to say, don't say anything at all.

They can ban all they want. This is not going to stop anything. The truth is great, and will always prevail.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Zakir Naik that Muslims must 'terrorize' (attack) the terrorists. I would be extremely happy if Muslims attacked western government and military targets in the UK, the U.S, Israel and other terrorist rogue states that have attacked and invaded Muslim lands and killed millions of Muslims! Needless to say that I oppose killing of civilians.
 
Last edited:
Hurry up! those who are interested, check this website right now!!!

http://www.apc2010.org/

It is refuting all the ugly British claims and false accusations! HURRY UP!!!

Tobah! These HYPOCRITES are just so busted!


Interestingly, although not surprisingly, all the atheists, agnostics and other non-muslims are DEAFENINGLY silent about this news, when they were so viciously defended the right of morons whoblasphemed the prophet SAW and consciously incited hatred.

This news is the latest evident of Islamophobia among the western government and western media.

Totally agree with you dear brother!

Lets hope that may the British govt overturn the exclusion order. "Dr. Zakir intends to bring the matter to UK's High Court". May Allah accept our duas! imsad


So to keep yourself updated, keep going to these two websites.

http://www.apc2010.org/

And

http://events.idci.co.uk/index.php
 
Last edited:
Al-Khair Peace Convention 2010

Both events has been postponeded until exclusion order has been squashed

May Peace Be On You ("As-Salaamu Alaikum").

Press Release by Islamic Research Foundation (IRF)

This is in reference to the exclusion order for Dr. Zakir Naik passed by the Secretary of Home Department, UK.

Dr. Zakir Naik - President of IRF, is a world renowned orator on Islam & Comparative religion has got millions of followers all over the world including India. He was scheduled to give talks during his forthcoming tour to U.K at 3 different major venues including Sheifield Arena on 25th June, Wimbley Arena on 26th June and at LG Arena (NEC), Birmingham on 27th June 2010. All the 3 venues were completely booked weeks in advance.

Thousands of his fans in U.K. and millions of his well wishers all over the world were dejected with the move of Home Department UK, which issued exclusion orders on 17th June 2010, on the basis of misquotations taken from his lectures out of context.

Hence IRF felt it is necessary to issue Press Release and give replies to their false allegations and clear his viewpoints.

This website has Press Release by Dr. Zakir's Islamic Research Foundation! Read it right now! Please! Scroll down to the bottom of the page of the website and there you'll find written "Press Release" on the left hand-side!

Allahu Akbar!
 


Press_Release

By Dr. Zakir's Islamic Research Foundation!

Refuting all their accusations!
 
Last edited:
Plus you people know, there was something so ironic in this whole event.

Dr.Zakir was going to give a lecture on "Freedom of Expression" and yet he himself was denied one in UK. Ironic!

I find it funny and sad too. imsad ...mixed feelings...sometimes get really confused!
 
WOW, I can't believe this.. I am truely shocked an annoyed. This government has no idea. :(
 
So they ban Zakir Naik but allow Geet Wilders?

insert facepalm gif here.


Geet Wilders is an MP from a country part of the EU . So they cant hardly ban him even if they wanted to because the EU human right court would not allow it. The EU human right court wouldnt apply to Zakir because he is from a counrty outside the EU.
 
But but but
i saw that he will be coming to Birmingham, n thats in the Uk :-\

Or im i just saying something totally diff :-\
 
And would you please like to give examples of some of his "silly" comments?

Amongst other oddities regarding other religions and science, I think by far the strongest contender for silliest comment is in thes video, where Naik compares the prohibition of the building of places of worship to, of all things, a maths question.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plyS8sIUjmQ

I think the reason he conjured up such an inane analogy was that he was put on the spot so to speak, but it doesn't make it any less silly

Which quote he gave, which was not in the proper context???

I think he's taken quite a few of context. From memory, he takes quotes of Jesus out of context quite a lot, such as when he says Jesus promoted violence.
ou know something- you can keep your comments with you!!! because the person your talking about has read both YOUR bible, Hindu scriptures, Sikh's scriptures etc. So saying that he makes "erroneous assumptions" is totally silly and wrong of you!

Well... no. If he's making mistakes, it's actually rather silly of him, not me.

He is a student of comparative religions, and had hundreds of times dialogues with your priests! Why didn't any of your scholars ever said it on his face? Because this is just an allegation your laying against him.

I know who he is and what he's done, thank you.
What Supreme said. While his arguments are nowhere near as convincing as those who already accept them seem to think, Naik is a serious scholar and, as far as I'm aware, a man of peace not violence.

Indeed. I really can't see him retreating to a cave, wearing a 50 year old AK 47 round his shoulder and calling for the West to be utterly obliterated any time soon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top