Inquiry launched after Islamic group holds segregated lecture

العنود;1581711 said:
you're speaking to someone who makes sodomy akin to religion

You visualize people worshiping anal sex? What twisted imagination you have. A little bit of projection maybe?
 
No I don't! I am not the one making deranged similes - in fact you're I was merely alerting her so she wouldn't be discouraged or confused as to where you draw the line or find tangible similarities!

Best,
 
It seems simple.

If a non-Muslim decides to attend a lecture on Islam, they should expect things to be conducted according to the tenets of Islam.

If being segregated by gender is oh-so-offensive: Don't go!
 
fact is no such demands were made from Non-Muslims. This is purely for the comfort and decorousness of Muslim attendees.
And they should be able to argue on behalf of themselves whether or not such an arrangement bothers them. Nothing infuriates me personally more than a Non-Muslim speaking on my behalf!
 
im not sure it does,

i went off on a tangent at praying to sodomy.


if you want back on topic then you can read my other posts in the thread..

the idea of segregation based on perceived superiority, does not allow for muslims to show they are muslims.

the best side of them imo.

and the university setting is one where most interaction can take place before entering the real world.


so those drinking clubbers by night and shunned in the morning really do need more than prodding with a long stick to move further away.

but you have to be on your religion to have that sort of...confidence.

although what people define as confidence is a reflection of character.



if you can place sentences between mine it might make sense.
 
Last edited:
the idea of segregation based on perceived superiority, does not allow for muslims to show they are muslims.
Where did you come up with this? segregation based on 'superiority'? who the heck came up with that?
 
it was probably me adding it up wrong again.

i mean the topic has had some varied posts,

the gist of what i got was that it went from sexual discrimination to not wanting to sit together.

in both cases,

it was in an environment where there was a supervising faculty who ultimately (as has been proved) takes into consideration the complaints made to them.


so what danger was there in not sitting together?

other than lust.

any other problem and knowledgeable muslim men and women would have been able to provide answers.


this post has been utter rubbish. but nothing is as simple as just spending time in the company of people to find out who they are.

i mean sometimes i feel as though islam is not all literal or worldly.


why?

because saying your a muslim makes you a muslim.
 
Last edited:
the gist of what i got was that it went from sexual discrimination to not wanting to sit together.
Neither is accurate!
It is a lecture not a brothel. People should be there to concentrate on the material not the opposite gender. especially when there's ample time to socialize outside of lectured setting in a society that is already allowing as is. Those who want to sit together aren't kept apart, I doubt very much that Muslims want to socialize inside a lecture hall. Probably deranged perverts the likes of Doggins who wishes to impose his lecherous needs upon people who otherwise just wish to attend for learning purposes!
 
with the utmost respect i can honestly tell you a story of our islamic society co-ordinator who married a lady that was part of the society.

i dont misconstrue any of the above.

i respect adults actually acting as adults.


what i dont get is people who want control for the sake of control.


i have no idea who doggins is?
 
with the utmost respect i can honestly tell you a story of our islamic society co-ordinator who married a lady that was part of the society.
and what does her story have to do with this?


i dont misconstrue any of the above.
You just invented and added -yes!
i respect adults actually acting as adults.
OK!
some adults like to smoke, other adults don't- should the two sit together because a liberal said so?


what i dont get is people who want control for the sake of control.
Again, no idea how this relates?
i have no idea who doggins is?
Dawkins, he acts like an animal and expects others to so behave so why not call a spade a spade?

best,
 
Seema Jilani put it best at white house correspondent dinner and I feel it applies.
''[h=5]Let's stop this facade that we are a beacon of tolerance. I don't need you to "tolerate" me. I don't want you to merely put up with my presence. All I ask, all I have ever asked, is to be treated as a human being, that bigoted jingoism is not injected into every minute facet my life, that there remains at least the illusion of decency.''[/h]
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top