is voting really haram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azc
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 76
  • Views Views 13K
Democracy is haraam?

Since when?

The first khaliphs were chosen via vote.

Voting is not haraam.

But I don't vote.

As not voting is not haraam either.

And in todays world, the impression we get is that we are either voting for the left (liberal) wing or the right (conservative) wing.

Most can't see past those two wings... and they fail to realise, they are both attached to the same bird.

I don't believe in voting in today's world.

I mean, I still find pencils in ballot booths.... I used a pen once and was told, "you must use the pencil provided"... why? so they can rub out my vote and pencil in someone for me instead?

I mean, no one is that stupid, are they?

Oh wait, did I mention ballot box scandals?

That one is a thread on its own.

Scim
 
Vote to a haraami is haraam of-course...Note: Haraami means no abuse it means a man who eat speak and listen to haraam things.. etc etc
you mean people must have complete bio data of every candidate before voting...
 
From the examples of the Rightly Guided Khalifah and further on, there was no mass general election where people would go into voting booths and cast ballots to choose their candidate. The people of influence in the society would be the ones who would make the determination as who would be the next Khalifah. Then the general masses would follow suit once they arrived at a decision. And in the beginning, whoever Medina chose, then rest of the towns and provinces would follow suit with what is called the bai'ah (pledge). Those of the people of influence would directly pledge to the newly appointed leader and the general masses in the rest of the territories would give the bai'ah to his appointed governors. Abu Bakr's appointment came in the courtyard of Sa'ad ibn Ubaadah when Umar impetuously grabbed Abu Bakr's hand and made bai'ah to squash any fitnah that was going to occur. The others of the Ansar followed afterwards. Umar was chosen by Abu Bakr on his deathbed. Uthman was chosen though shura (council) of six potential candidates selected by Umar. As you can see, none of this was the decision of the general masses. When the people of influence made their decision, then the common people obeyed. Lastly and more importantly, all of these people (those appointed and those who made the decision) were Muslims and implemented Shariah, the Law of Allah. They were not participating to establish or keep in place man-made laws. This is kufr. Voting in the political process of the disbelievers suggests that you would rather abide by that law, be complicit in perpetuating that law, are pleased with that law. This is kufr. Democracy is the will of the people. Not the Will of Allah. Muslims better get their affairs in order and stop imitating the disbelievers in their politics. Also, when a Muslim votes like many of them have done with Western candidates who eventually got elected, then those Muslims are complicit with whatever of warfare and oppression that those leaders subject the Muslims around the world. Also, of the evil laws they implement like allowing gay marriage. Let that be on your conscious. You assisted in putting them there with your vote. You suffer the consequences on the Day of Judgement for your participation in that political process. And Allah Knows Best
so you think that accepting man made laws is kufr...?
 
Last edited:
[/snip]...

...I mean, I still find pencils in ballot booths.... I used a pen once and was told, "you must use the pencil provided"... why? so they can rub out my vote and pencil in someone for me instead?

I mean, no one is that stupid, are they?

Oh wait, did I mention ballot box scandals?

That one is a thread on its own.

Scim

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37845164 Oh boy oh boy...

BBC said:
People could get the choice of a pen as well as a pencil when they go to vote, after fraud fears at the EU referendum.


BBC said:
The Electoral Commission received "almost 200 calls" from voters worried about using a pencil on 23 June.

Lib Dem Lord Rennard has asked the government if it would provide "special ballot pens" instead of pencils.

And the Electoral Commission says it is looking at "alternatives to providing pencils for voters in polling stations which could improve confidence".
BBC said:
The issue of using pencils to vote became an issue on social media for people voting in June's referendum who feared ballot papers filled out in pencil could be rubbed out and changed, leading the hashtag #usepens to gain traction on Twitter.


Meanwhile, the Govt agencies contact China to find pens that can have their marks erased... pencil or pen, your vote aint worth sheeeeeet.

Except, maybe some extra points on your experian/equifax credit rating. LOL. And let's face it. That just promotes the haraam of riba.

Scimi
 
Caliphs were not necessarily elected on the basis of a democratic general opinion.There however were Shura councils involved that reached a consensus on the who the Caliph would be.
yes, and concept of shura was given by Hz umar :RA:
 
yes, and concept of shura was given by Hz umar :RA:

That didn't last long, only a few generations.

After that, we entered the rule of Kings, instead of justly chosen Khaliphs. Now, we're in the time of Tyrants.

Voting? what difference does it really make when the whole charade is a circus act?

Scimi
 
A list of notable elections involving voter fraud or procedural challenge

This is a list of notable elections involving accusations of direct voter fraud or in which the results were procedurally contested, extensively protested, or recognized as fraudulent by a reliable international organization.


SAUCE

Notice something?

The frequency by which the votes are contested increase in the latter years.

Scimi
 
That didn't last long, only a few generations.After that, we entered the rule of Kings, instead of justly chosen Khaliphs. Now, we're in the time of Tyrants.Voting? what difference does it really make when the whole charade is a circus act?Scimi
yes, and we can observe what is happening Muslim countries either they are kings or dictators
 
Forget voting, prepare for the Imaam.

That's the angle I'm playing out.

And Allah knows best.

Scimi
 
everyone wants a fatwa nowadays ,it does make us look like aliens once again,a fatwa for everything

our wise elder ulema ..if you vote dont criticise those that dont
if you dont vote..dont criticise those that do..
in fact why tell anyone,its your own business
and like much else,between you and allah,no one else
 
everyone wants a fatwa nowadays ,it does make us look like aliens once again,a fatwa for everythingour wise elder ulema ..if you vote dont criticise those that dontif you dont vote..dont criticise those that do..in fact why tell anyone,its your own businessand like much else,between you and allah,no one else
We should see what is good for us and our Muslims society especially if we live in a non Muslim country
 
Last edited:
why do you separate voting and campaign..?

…because I remember reading somewhere that the best man for the job is one who is able to do it (but perhaps shy to actually offer) and not one who actively seeks the post. So, when someone actively 'campaigns' to seek votes is often not because of the task at hand that needs to be done 'properly', but more for the power it wields.. (so effect, the campaigning part often sells lots of untruths).


:peace:
 
…because I remember reading somewhere that the best man for the job is one who is able to do it (but perhaps shy to actually offer) and not one who actively seeks the post. So, when someone actively 'campaigns' to seek votes is often not because of the task at hand that needs to be done 'properly', but more for the power it wields.. (so effect, the campaigning part often sells lots of untruths).:peace:
valid point though but practically not possible until the iislamization of whole electoral system is done...
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top