Grace Seeker
IB Legend
- Messages
- 5,343
- Reaction score
- 617
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Christianity
It is suspected that Al-Qaeda was behind the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and that among the reasons for this were her western leanings seen in her pro-democracy stance.
Many in the Muslim community desire Sharia law which, as I understand it, is simply the rule of God over the community. Of course, this rule would be in accordance with a Muslim interpretation of what God's will was not some other individual's or group's understanding. Thus, if an individual wanted to practice something that was contrary to the ways of Islam, say converting from Islam to another religion, listening to music, practicing homosexuality, these things would not be tolerated in a pure Islamic state ruled by Sharia law (I understand that no such state presently exists anywhere).
On the other hand, in a democracy (which I don't think a pure democracy exists anywhere either), one of the principals is that even the views of the minority are to be tolerated. So, a person can switch endlessly, even mindlessly between any number of religions, can listen to the most disgusting music, and can practice all sorts of sexual relationships (even those thought by others to be perversions) as long as doing so does not harm or infringe on the rights of another.
Thus to me it appears that perhaps, though there are many Muslims that seem to value many democratice ideals, that in the end Islam and democracy are actually antithetical to one another. Would you accept this as a true assessment?
Many in the Muslim community desire Sharia law which, as I understand it, is simply the rule of God over the community. Of course, this rule would be in accordance with a Muslim interpretation of what God's will was not some other individual's or group's understanding. Thus, if an individual wanted to practice something that was contrary to the ways of Islam, say converting from Islam to another religion, listening to music, practicing homosexuality, these things would not be tolerated in a pure Islamic state ruled by Sharia law (I understand that no such state presently exists anywhere).
On the other hand, in a democracy (which I don't think a pure democracy exists anywhere either), one of the principals is that even the views of the minority are to be tolerated. So, a person can switch endlessly, even mindlessly between any number of religions, can listen to the most disgusting music, and can practice all sorts of sexual relationships (even those thought by others to be perversions) as long as doing so does not harm or infringe on the rights of another.
Thus to me it appears that perhaps, though there are many Muslims that seem to value many democratice ideals, that in the end Islam and democracy are actually antithetical to one another. Would you accept this as a true assessment?